Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Shakuntala Devi v. Madan Jha

12 Apr 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A. K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:2394-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld mutation of agricultural land in favour of male heirs under the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, holding that the appellant's rights extinguished upon marriage and that the 2005 Hindu Succession Act amendment does not apply retroactively.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 Hindu Succession Act, 1956 mutation of agricultural land succession rights

Rahul Chaudhary v. Union of India & Ors.

12 Apr 2018 · Hima Kohli; Pratibha Rani · 2018:DHC:2393-DB

The Delhi High Court held that discharge of a formally appointed RPF constable on grounds of unblemished character was unsustainable when the candidate had disclosed pending criminal cases and was acquitted after compounding, directing his reinstatement.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 discharge of recruit attestation form criminal antecedents

Praduman Patel v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

12 Apr 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:2403-DB

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if neither possession is taken nor compensation paid, notwithstanding prior vesting of land in Gram Sabha.

property petition_allowed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) 2013 Act possession compensation

Sameer @ Mustakim v. State

12 Apr 2018 · Vipin Sanghi; P. S. Teji · 2018:DHC:2390-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to failure of prosecution to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the primacy of presumption of innocence over mere recovery of weapon.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence presumption of innocence recovery of weapon Section 302 IPC

R B SURI v. STATE & ANR

12 Apr 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:2391

The Delhi High Court allowed compounding of a cheque dishonour offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, reducing costs in view of the petitioner's age and health, and acquitted him accordingly.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 147 Negotiable Instruments Act compounding of offence Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H

Suraj v. State of NCT of Delhi

12 Apr 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:2386

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a Section 307 IPC case based on a settlement with the complainant, subject to stringent conditions, without commenting on the merits.

criminal appeal_allowed bail Section 307 IPC settlement agreement regular bail

Waseema & Anr v. Saeedah Haque & Ors

12 Apr 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:2383

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for partition and declaration, holding that cancelled Agreements to Sell and GPAs do not confer title and the suit was barred by limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Agreement to Sell General Power of Attorney specific performance partition suit

BT&FC Pvt Ltd and Anr v. State & Anr

12 Apr 2018 · S.P. Garg · 2018:DHC:2384

The Delhi High Court disposed of the revision petition as settled and acquitted the petitioners under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, imposing costs due to the amicable compounding of the offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act compounding of offence revision petition amicable settlement

Kamlesh Kumar Magnani v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

12 Apr 2018 · S. P. Garg · 2018:DHC:2385

Anticipatory bail was denied to a doctor accused of rape on the false promise of marriage, given the gravity of allegations and non-cooperation with investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. rape false promise to marry

National Highways Authority of India v. NCC-VEE(JV)

12 Apr 2018 · Yogesh Khanna · 2018:DHC:2379

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral tribunal's order allowing a delayed challenge to an arbitrator's appointment on grounds of bias, holding the challenge was within limitation and not amenable to interim judicial interference.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12(3) Section 13(2) Section 34

Dr Ananya Sharma v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences

12 Apr 2018 · Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:2380

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing AIIMS to grant admission to a candidate who was allocated a postgraduate medical seat but failed to actively accept it online due to technical issues, emphasizing fairness and reliance on earlier notices and document acceptance.

administrative petition_allowed Significant online counselling active acceptance seat allocation technical difficulties

Vior(International) Ltd & Anr v. Maxycon Health Care Private Limited & Ors

12 Apr 2018 · Yogesh Khanna · 2018:DHC:2381

The Delhi High Court held that defendants infringed a valid Indian patent and copyright, awarded damages including punitive damages, and granted relief to the plaintiffs in an ex parte suit for unauthorized manufacture, sale, and false representation.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant patent infringement copyright infringement Ferric Carboxymaltose Indian Patent No. 221536

Sohan Lal v. Jamunawati & Ors.

12 Apr 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:2395

The High Court dismissed the appeal against the final decree directing auction of partitioned property, holding that the preliminary decree could not be challenged in absence of an appeal or changed circumstances.

civil appeal_dismissed Section 97 CPC preliminary decree final decree partition suit

Pulkit Aggarwal v. Reliance General Insurance Company Limited & Ors.

12 Apr 2018 · J. R. Midha · 2018:DHC:2396

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a grievously injured appellant by awarding additional amounts for loss of amenities, disfiguration, and loss of marriage prospects, recognizing these as valid heads of damages.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compensation enhancement loss of amenities of life disfiguration loss of marriage prospects

Bahadur Dass v. Mohd. Shakeel & Ors

12 Apr 2018 · J.R. Midha · 2018:DHC:2397

Delhi High Court enhanced the compensation awarded to an accident victim for pain and suffering, loss of amenities, and disfiguration while upholding the loss of income award.

civil appeal_allowed compensation enhancement pain and suffering loss of amenities disfiguration

M/S WELLDONE EXIM PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE & ANR.

12 Apr 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:2398-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Rs. 1 crore threshold in the Incremental Export Incentivisation Scheme is not a cap but a trigger for greater scrutiny, directing the Regional Authority to consider claims beyond this amount through reasoned orders.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Incremental Export Incentivisation Scheme Foreign Trade Policy 2009-2014 Notification No. 43(RE-2013)/2009-2014 export incentive

Himanshu Dabas & Ors. v. Central Board of Secondary Education & Ors.

12 Apr 2018 · Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:2382

The Delhi High Court directed CBSE to conduct the CTET examination within four months, affirming NCTE's authority to mandate annual conduct of the test as a mandatory qualification for teacher appointments.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Central Teacher Eligibility Test CTET National Council for Teacher Education Central Board of Secondary Education

Hamendra Nath Sharma v. Union of India

12 Apr 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2387

The Delhi High Court held that deduction from retiral gratuity based on a cancelled government accommodation allotment order was unjustified and directed refund with interest.

administrative petition_allowed Significant government accommodation unauthorized sub-letting retiral benefits gratuity deduction

National Insurance Co Ltd v. Meenu Bhatiya & Ors

12 Apr 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2388
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by confirming truck driver’s negligence, adjusting future prospects addition to 40%, and reducing non-pecuniary damages in line with Supreme Court precedent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim negligence loss of dependency future prospects

Tarkeshwr Jha v. Food Corporation of India

12 Apr 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2389

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking Selection Grade Scale on grounds of delay and non-availability of vacancy within the prescribed quota despite seniority.

labor petition_dismissed Selection Grade Scale seniority vacancy 30% quota