Delhi High Court
30,090 judgments
Manish Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-34(1) Delhi
The Delhi High Court remanded the challenge to the Section 148 notice and Section 148A(d) order for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer after hearing the petitioner, following recent Supreme Court precedents.
M/S TRANS INDIA LOGISTICS v. GSTO, WARD-60 & ANR
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders due to improper notice of Show Cause Notices and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.
Roopa Goyal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 28(1) Delhi
The Delhi High Court remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration of notices issued under Section 148 and related provisions of the Income Tax Act for AY 2014-15, directing reasoned orders within four weeks.
B.C. Enterprises v. Income Tax Officer Ward 58(3) Delhi
The Delhi High Court remanded the reassessment proceedings under Section 148/148A of the Income Tax Act for fresh consideration, directing the Assessing Officer to hear the petitioner and pass reasoned orders within four weeks.
Banyan Capital Advisors LLP v. Income Tax Officer Ward 4 (2) Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that notices issued under Section 148 for AY 2015-16 beyond the limitation period prescribed under Section 149(1) are invalid as TOLA does not extend limitation for that year, and quashed the impugned notice and proceedings.
Dhurav Real Estate Developers Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(1), Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court remanded the reassessment proceedings under Sections 148 and 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 2013-14 to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after hearing the petitioner.
Shashi Bala Jain v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court remanded the reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer after hearing the petitioner, emphasizing compliance with limitation and judicial precedents.
Tejinder Singh v. Beverley Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's injunction restraining alienation of the shared matrimonial property during pending maintenance proceedings, affirming Family Court jurisdiction and protective relief in matrimonial disputes.
Sunil Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic Tribunal order dismissing recruitment-related claims and remanded the matter for fresh, reasoned consideration.
Swadeshi Tubes Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 22(2), New Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed remand of disputed income tax notices and orders to the Assessing Officer for fresh hearing and decision within four weeks, emphasizing compliance with statutory and constitutional requirements.
Union of India and Anr. v. Manoj Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld Tribunal orders setting aside termination of employees for alleged impersonation during recruitment, holding that such stigmatic termination requires departmental inquiry and cannot be based solely on an unproved FSL report.
Sachin Yadav v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking compassionate appointment filed long after the death of the government servant, reaffirming that such appointments must be sought promptly and are not a right or alternative recruitment mode.
Monika Juneja v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The High Court declined to interfere under its supervisory jurisdiction where the substantive injunction application was pending before the Trial Court and the appellate court had permitted fresh arguments.
Rajesh Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondents to treat it as a representation and decide on the issues within six weeks.
Ritu Sharma v. Kailash Chand and Anr
The High Court upheld the execution of a possession decree against a judgment debtor, holding that a purchaser of the property during the pendency of the suit cannot resist execution under the doctrine of lis pendens.
Brigadier Balwant Dahiya Trust v. Shakuntala Dahiya and Ors
The High Court granted defendant no. 5 one final opportunity to produce a witness despite earlier closure by the Trial Court due to non-service of summons.
Casablanca Apparels Pvt Ltd v. Polo/ Lauren Company L.P.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the condonation of delay application and consequently the commercial appeal filed beyond the prescribed limitation period, holding that the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause under the Limitation Act, 1963 and Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Sansadiya Adhikari Welfare Society v. Utpal Kumar Tripathi & Ors.
A welfare society acquiring land for residential development for members qualifies as a promoter under RERA and must comply with its provisions including pre-deposit requirements.
Sonu S/O Shri Ben Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexual offences against a child under IPC and POCSO Act, affirming the reliability of the child victim's testimony and rejecting the appeal despite minor discrepancies in timelines.
Vipin Gupta v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a compromise with legal representatives of a deceased victim cannot be a ground to quash an FIR under Sections 279/304A IPC, rejecting the petition and allowing criminal proceedings to continue.