Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Mr. Sumit Vijay & Anr. v. Major League Baseball Properties Inc. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of the BLUE-JAY trade mark registration for bad faith adoption and recognized the respondents' prior worldwide use and trans-border reputation of the BLUE JAYS mark in India.
Anuradha Salhotra, Rahul Chaudhry, Nikhil Sharma and Mugdha Palsule, Avinash v. Koninklijke Philips NV
The Delhi High Court upheld infringement of a patent claim covering DVDs containing patented EFM+ encoded signals and dismissed stay applications against the decree awarding damages.
Jai Mangal Rai v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that seniority among direct recruit BSF Sub Inspectors must be fixed from the date of actual appointment and joining, and delay due to medical clearance does not entitle candidates to antedated seniority.
Campus EAI India Pvt. Ltd. v. Neeraj Tiwari & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's copyright infringement suit against former employees and their company, holding the expert report under Section 20 of the Indian Evidence Act binding and finding no plagiarism in the software source codes.
Professor Alka Acharya v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed the petitioner as legal guardian of her comatose husband under its parens patriae jurisdiction, filling a statutory vacuum regarding guardianship for persons in vegetative states.
Hitesh Makhija v. Ritu Makhija
The Delhi High Court upheld the petitioner-husband's liability to pay interim maintenance for three minor children, rejecting his claim of low income and reducing the maintenance amount from ₹30,000 to ₹25,000 per month based on a holistic assessment of financial capacity and parental responsibility.
Sandeepa Virk v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a woman accused under the PMLA, holding that the twin conditions for bail do not apply to women and that the petitioner had made out a prima facie case for bail despite serious money laundering allegations.
Dr. Akash Laxmanrao Narade v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition, holding that the petitioner was not entitled to reservation benefits without a valid OBC-NCL certificate on the cut-off date and reaffirmed the limited scope of review jurisdiction under Article 226.
Ved Prakash & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against legal heirs for alleged forgery and cheating in mutation documents, holding that the material did not disclose essential ingredients of offences and continuation would be abuse of process.
Dinesh Kumar Pandey v. M/S Singh Finlease Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that disputed resignation of a director does not warrant quashing of proceedings under Sections 138 and 141 NI Act, leaving factual issues to be decided at trial.
Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd v. Amul-Franchise.in & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Domain Name Registrars must verify registrant identities and cooperate with enforcement agencies to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud, granting injunctions against infringing domain names and directing banks to freeze fraudulent accounts.
Bajaj Finance Limited v. Registrant of www.bajaj-finserve.org & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that domain name registrars and banks must implement stringent measures including disclosure, suspension, and beneficiary verification to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud via fraudulent domain names.
Microsoft Corporation & Anr. v. PCPatchers Technology Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld interim injunctions against fraudulent domain name registrations infringing Microsoft's trademarks and issued comprehensive directions to domain registrars and authorities to curb trademark misuse online.
N’VYBE E COMMERCE v. MANASH LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte interim injunction in a trademark dispute, holding that prior use by the defendant requires notice and opportunity before granting such relief.
Ultratech Cement Limited v. www.ultratechcements.com & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that domain name registrars must verify registrant identities and comply with court orders to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud, directing systemic reforms involving banks, law enforcement, and government agencies.
JOCKEY INTERNATIONAL INC. v. WWW.JOCKEYFRANCHISE.COM & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that Domain Name Registrars and banks must implement robust verification and cooperation mechanisms to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud through fraudulent domain names, directing systemic reforms and enforcement measures.
Mukesh Paswan v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging dismissal from service after the respondents agreed to reinstate the petitioner subject to verification of credentials.
Kajaria Ceramics Limited v. GoDaddy.com LLC & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held domain name registrars liable for verifying registrant identities and issued comprehensive directions to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud involving fraudulent domain names, coordinating banks, telecom providers, and law enforcement agencies.
BURGER KING CORPORATION v. SWAPNIL PATIL & ORS.
Delhi High Court granted injunctions and issued directions to Domain Name Registrars, banks, and government agencies to curb fraudulent use of Burger King trademarks in domain names and associated cyber fraud.
State NCT of Delhi v. Subodh Kumar & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that credible testimony of a rape victim alone suffices for conviction without corroboration, set aside the acquittal, and convicted the accused under Section 376(2)(g) IPC.