Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Jitender Mohan @ Jatin v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord based on an amicable settlement between the parties.
Harbhajan Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354-D and 509 IPC based on a settlement between parties and withdrawal of prosecution, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process.
Vivek Kumar @ Vickky v. The State GNCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused in an alleged assault case where evidence was inconclusive and petitioners cooperated with investigation.
Vivek Kumar @ Vickky v. The State GNCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused persons in an assault case due to lack of conclusive evidence and their cooperation with the investigation.
Vivek Kumar @ Vickky v. The State GNCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused in an alleged assault case, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and lack of conclusive evidence.
Aditya Birla Nuvo Limited v. M/S R.S Sales Corporation & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff's registered trademark 'PETER ENGLAND' is valid and infringed by the defendants' use of 'PETER ENGLAND VIP SHOES', granting permanent injunction and dismissing defendants' defenses based on copyright registration and business category.
Pradeep @ Raju v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder under Section 302 IPC due to failure of the prosecution to establish a complete and reliable chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
Jatinder Kumar Popli v. Ashok Kumar Popli
The Delhi High Court upheld the execution order directing the appellant to execute a Relinquishment Deed in favor of respondent no.3, subject to an undertaking addressing the appellant's apprehensions.
Amit Balian & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed as withdrawn petitions seeking quashing of two FIRs on the ground of settlement without adjudicating on the merits.
Anuradha Chowdhry v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of FIRs and transfer of investigation after charge sheet filing, holding that an accused cannot seek such relief post-investigation.
GD Satender Singh Negi v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking MACP benefits from an earlier date due to invalid legal notices and directed petitioners to first seek administrative redressal.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3 v. HFCL Infotel Ltd.
Delhi High Court dismissed Revenue's appeals against HFCL Infotel Ltd. on claims under Section 35ABB and related disallowances, affirming earlier favorable precedents.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -6 v. Nazar Trading Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed tax appeals by consent and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment without expressing any opinion on merits.
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) v. Mohd. Ashif Billa @ Ashif & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition challenging the acquittal of accused in a POCSO and IPC case due to contradictions and delay in prosecution evidence, affirming the principle of benefit of doubt.
Rekha Rani v. Kiran Malhotra
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the respondent in a cheque dishonor case due to the petitioner's failure to prove the agreement and the respondent's signature on the cheque.
Meenakshi Sharma v. Ravi Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's decree declaring a marriage null and void where the appellant had a living spouse and no formal divorce decree, rejecting the validity of an informal mutual agreement as dissolution.
Rashmi Jain v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order summoning the petitioner as an additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C., holding that stronger than mere probability but less than proof beyond reasonable doubt is required to exercise this power.
Madhu Bala v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking admission after counselling and academic session concluded, holding such relief infructuous and damages claims not maintainable in the writ.
Geeta Devi v. Sunil Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the wife's appeal and upheld the divorce decree on the ground of desertion under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, finding that she had avoided resumption of matrimonial cohabitation despite efforts by the husband.
Texmaco Infrastructure and Holding Limited v. State & Ors.
The High Court held that jurisdiction under Section 452 Cr.P.C. to restore possession arises only after trial conclusion and dismissed the petition seeking interim possession during pendency of criminal proceedings.