Amit Balian & Anr. v. State & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 09 Jul 2018 · 2018:DHC:9109
Mukta Gupta
W.P.(CRL)1968/2018
2018:DHC:9109
criminal other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed as withdrawn petitions seeking quashing of two FIRs on the ground of settlement without adjudicating on the merits.

Full Text
Translation output
\ HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P.(CRL)I965/20I8 RAHOULRAI .....Petitioner
Represented by: Mr.Vivek Seed,Sr.Advocate with
Mr.M.L.Yadav and Mr.Siddharth Gupta,Advocates
STATE &ANR.
Represented by:
W.P.(CRL)1968/2018
AMIT BALIAN & ANR.
STATE & ANR.
VERSUS
..... Respondents Mr.Rajesh Mahajan,ASC for
Ms.Kamna Vohra,ASC for the State with SI Rakesh Kumar,PS Saket
Mr.Sanjay Abott,Advocate for R-2 Petitioners Mr.Sanjay Abott,Advocate
VERSUS
Respondents Mr.Rajesh Mahajan,ASC for Ms.Kamna Vohra,ASC for the State with SI Rakesh Kumar,PS Saket ^
Mr.Vivek Sood,Sr.Advocate with , Mr.M.L.Yadav and Mr.Siddharth
Gupta,Advocates for R-2 .
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
09.07.2018 Crl.M.A.No.12119/2018 in W.P.fCrI.I No.1965/2018
Cri
M.A.No.12i29/2018 in W.P.fCri.)No.1968/2018
Allowed subjecttojust exceptions.
2018:DHC:9109 W.P.fCrl.^ No.1965/2018& Crl.M.A.No.12118/2018
W.P/Crl.VNo.1968/2018 & Crl.M.A.No.12128/2018
By these petitions,the petitioners seek quashing ofFIR No.461/2017
^and FIR No.538/2017onthe ground thatparties have,settled the matter.
Aftersome argumentslearned courisel(s)forthe petitioners seekleave to withdraw the petitions.
The petitions andthe applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA,J.
JULY 09,2018 mamta 2018:DHC:9109
JUDGMENT