Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

The Gillette Company LLC v. Tigaksha Metallics Private Ltd. & Anr

09 Jul 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:3977

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendants from using the mark 'TALVAR' and sword device, holding that similarity in idea conveyed by marks including literal translations can constitute trademark infringement and passing off.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off trade mark similarity literal translation

Sabina Sahdev & Ors. v. Vidur Sahdev

09 Jul 2018 · Vipin Sanghi; P. S. Teji · 2018:DHC:3981-DB

The Delhi High Court held that statutory appeals and revisions against interim maintenance orders under the DV Act and CrPC are maintainable without any precondition of deposit of arrears, striking down judicial directions imposing such conditions as impermissible curtailment of statutory remedies.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant interim maintenance Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29 DV Act Section 125 CrPC

Bhawish Chand Sharma v. Bawa Singh

09 Jul 2018 · Vipin Sanghi · 2018:DHC:3980

The Delhi High Court set aside the acquittal and convicted the respondent under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the cheque was issued towards discharge of a legally enforceable debt and the defence was not substantiated.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act Section 139 NI Act Dishonour of cheque

Destination Cafe Private Limited v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

09 Jul 2018 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:3979

The Delhi High Court held that sealing of commercial premises without prior notice or hearing is arbitrary and directed issuance of show cause notice and reasoned order before further action.

administrative other Significant sealing order No Objection Certificate natural justice show cause notice

G. K. Sood v. Union of India

09 Jul 2018 · Gita Mittal; C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:3989-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the appointment of a whole-time Director of NDDB, holding that the age cut-off Office Memorandum does not apply to statutory bodies and the appointment complied with statutory requirements.

administrative petition_dismissed National Dairy Development Board whole-time Director appointment Office Memorandum 2005 Central Public Sector Enterprises

M K Subba v. Karan Luthra

09 Jul 2018 · Gita Mittal; C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:3993-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the interim injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the suit property pending trial on specific performance.

civil appeal_dismissed interim injunction specific performance agreement to sell loan transaction

Amit Jain v. Securities and Exchange Board of India & Anr

09 Jul 2018 · Vibhu Bahkru · 2018:DHC:3983

The Delhi High Court held that SEBI must form a clear opinion that grounds exist for penalty under Chapter VIA of the SEBI Act before appointing an Adjudicating Officer, and absent such opinion, the appointment and proceedings are without jurisdiction.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Adjudicating Officer appointment SEBI Act Section 15A PIT Regulations Formation of opinion

Kunna Devi v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

09 Jul 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:3984

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, for theft of electricity following an amicable settlement and payment of the agreed amount.

criminal petition_allowed Section 135 Indian Electricity Act theft of electricity FIR quashing settlement

Ram Swaroop Ghildiyal & Ors. v. State & Anr

09 Jul 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:3985

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord on the basis of an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial discord settlement

Shiraz Ahmed v. State & Anr

09 Jul 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:3986

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act

Kamal Kashyap & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

09 Jul 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:3987

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute settlement

Yogesh @ Chintu v. State

09 Jul 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:3988

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a firearm-related case due to inconclusive forensic evidence and absence of injury, subject to bail conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed regular bail Section 307 IPC Arms Act forensic report

Gaytri Vaidyanathan v. State & Anr

09 Jul 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:4009

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an FIR alleging criminal conspiracy and cheating, holding that ongoing investigation with reasonable suspicion cannot be interfered with under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR criminal conspiracy false allegations

Junsik Han v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

09 Jul 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:4010

The High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the notice issued by the Sessions Court in a revision petition, holding that premature interference in revisional proceedings is unwarranted.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 Cr.P.C. revision petition Section 397 Cr.P.C. Section 203 Cr.P.C.

Nirmala Devi v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

09 Jul 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:4011

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of criminal proceedings alleging forgery and conspiracy, holding that such defences must be examined at trial and not at the summoning stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 Cr.P.C. summoning order criminal complaint forgery

Brahm Singh v. Management, M/s The Hindustan Times Ltd. & Anr.

09 Jul 2018 · Pratibha Rani · 2018:DHC:4001

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging disposal of a writ petition based on a duly signed settlement for Rs. 2 lakhs as full and final settlement of all claims, holding no error apparent on record.

labor petition_dismissed Memorandum of Settlement Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Review petition Error apparent on face of record

Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd v. Nahar Industrial Enterprises

09 Jul 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:3996-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award for liquidated damages, holding that judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act is limited to cases of patent illegality or perversity.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 liquidated damages patent illegality

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited v. G+H Schallschutz GmbH

09 Jul 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:3997

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that an express force majeure clause providing alternative performance overrides the doctrine of frustration under Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, dismissing the petition challenging the award.

civil petition_dismissed Significant force majeure frustration of contract Section 56 Indian Contract Act Clause 25 Purchase Order

BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKS AG v. MADAN WALIA & ANR.

09 Jul 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:3998
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding that the IPAB's final decision on trademark BMW operates as res judicata, restraining respondents from using the mark due to likelihood of confusion and dishonest adoption.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off res judicata Intellectual Property Appellate Board

Jaikishan Aggarwal v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Jul 2018 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2018:DHC:3999

The Delhi High Court upheld HPCL's cancellation of a retail outlet allotment due to failure to provide land and held that the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities lacks jurisdiction to direct specific land allotments.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act 1995 Letter of Intent cancellation Preferential allotment Petroleum retail outlet