Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Rajinder Tiku v. Pragati Power Corporation Limited & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that an employee whose service is validly extended beyond superannuation date is entitled to pension benefits computed from the extended retirement date, overruling the respondents’ denial based on FR 56(d).
Deepak v. State; Karan v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld robbery convictions of appellants based on credible recovery and identification evidence but set aside one conviction due to doubtful seizure, modifying sentences to time served.
Aftab @ Jhangal v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for armed robbery and stabbing based on credible victim identification despite absence of Test Identification Parade and doubtful recovery of the weapon.
Tinku @ Rinku @ Vijay @ Vicky v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for robbery under Sections 392/397 IPC based on credible identification and recovery evidence, dismissing claims of false implication and procedural irregularities.
Jameel v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi); Vishnu Dev Paswan v. State
Delhi High Court acquitted Jameel for lack of evidence but upheld Vishnu Dev Paswan’s conviction for cheating and criminal conspiracy, modifying his sentences to run concurrently.
Jameel v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi); Vishnu Dev Paswan v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted Jameel for lack of evidence and upheld Vishnu Dev Paswan's conviction while modifying his sentences to run concurrently.
Deepak v. State; Karan v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld robbery convictions of appellants but set aside one charge due to doubtful recovery evidence, modifying sentences to time served and ordering their release.
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mahesh & Ors.
Delhi High Court partially allowed insurer's appeals by reducing compensation awarded to injured parties in a motor accident claim after reassessing functional disability and notional income in line with Supreme Court precedents.
Amit Mehta v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., holding that no interference is warranted after dismissal of revision and magistrate’s discretion to decline investigation was proper.
Jitendra Kumar Sinha v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed proceedings against a company director under Section 138/141 NI Act for lack of specific averments showing he was in charge or responsible for the company's business at the time of the cheque dishonour.
Vinay Kumar Mehta v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed proceedings against a company director under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for lack of specific averments that he was in charge of the company's business at the time of the cheque dishonour.
Bela Sethi v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of property mutation by NDMC for non-observance of natural justice but declined to quash the show cause notice for license revocation at the issuance stage.
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mahesh & Ors.
Delhi High Court partially allowed insurer's appeals by reducing compensation awarded for functional disability and adjusting interest rate in motor accident claims involving injured driver and student.
New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Gopal Malhotra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer is entitled to recover compensation from the owner of an insured vehicle if the driver's license is fake and the owner fails to prove due diligence in employing the driver.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rashmi Sharma & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside a motor accident compensation award for lack of evidence on negligence and remanded the case for fresh evidence and adjudication.
University of Delhi & Ors. v. Adarsh Raj Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed an application seeking permission to appear in supplementary examinations, reaffirming its earlier orders granting relief only to candidates who promptly approached the Court with interim orders.
Parth Bhatia v. Lt. Governor of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as satisfied after the government created a separate 3% reservation for persons with disability and directed expeditious consideration of the petitioner’s admission application.
Pradeep Gupta & Anr v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 406 IPC based on a settlement reached through mediation, emphasizing that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile when the complainant does not wish to proceed.
Vishal Gupta v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs arising from familial disputes based on a comprehensive family settlement and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.
Vijay Laxmi & Anr. v. Madhu Joshi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash domestic violence proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C., holding that such cases require proper inquiry and are not abated by the death of one respondent.