Delhi High Court
59,686 judgments
Ruhi Arora & Anr. v. Registrar General Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the answer keys of the Delhi Judicial Service Examination, holding that the keys were correct and judicial review of such academic disputes is limited.
Aryan College of Education & Anr v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the NCTE Appeal Committee to conduct a fresh verification of the petitioner institution's faculty and reconsider recognition for the B.Ed. course after it failed to consider material evidence before deciding the appeal.
R.K. (PVT.) ITI, DIST.-FARRUKHABAD, U.P v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside an order denying accreditation due to denial of hearing caused by notice sent to an incorrect email, directing fresh consideration after affording a proper hearing.
EMAMI LIMITED v. DABUR INDIA LIMITED
The Delhi High Court modified an interim injunction restraining publication of a new advertisement, holding that injunctions cannot be granted on mere apprehension and that interim observations are tentative pending final adjudication.
FIITJEE LTD. v. OM PRAKASH DARAL
The High Court allowed the appeal against dismissal of a criminal complaint for non-prosecution, holding that the trial court erred in not allowing the petitioner to file essential documents and lead evidence.
M/S ANU IMPEX v. M/S SUDHA COLLECTION
The High Court dismissed the appeal against acquittal in a cheque bounce case due to the complainant's failure to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt and produce original documents.
Mandeep Singh v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted letters of administration over immovable property to the sole surviving adopted son of the deceased under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, in absence of any contesting heirs.
Sharda Capsec Ltd v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a complaint under Section 138 NI Act, holding that absence of legal liability on the cheque date negates criminal liability despite cheque dishonour.
Arun Sangwan v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the convictions of appellants for robbery and related offences based on credible injured witness testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence despite procedural lapses and hostile witnesses.
Arun Sangwan v. State of Delhi
Delhi High Court upheld convictions for robbery and stabbing based on credible injured witness testimony corroborated by medical and investigative evidence despite some hostile witnesses and procedural challenges.
Arun Sangwan v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the convictions of three appellants for robbery and related offences based on credible injured testimony and corroborative evidence despite hostile witnesses and absence of recovery of weapon from all accused.
Javed @ Chikna v. State
Delhi High Court set aside convictions under Section 402 IPC and Arms Act due to insufficient evidence proving appellants assembled for dacoity beyond reasonable doubt.
Javed @ Chikna v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside convictions under Section 402 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act due to insufficient evidence proving the appellants assembled with intent to commit dacoity, emphasizing the distinction between preparation and assembling.
Javed @ Chikna v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside convictions under Section 402 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act due to insufficient credible evidence proving that appellants assembled for the purpose of committing dacoity.
Javed @ Chikna v. State
Delhi High Court set aside convictions under Section 402 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act due to insufficient evidence proving assembly for dacoity beyond reasonable doubt.
Santosh Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction and sentence of Santosh Kumar for voluntarily causing grievous hurt to his wife with a hammer, based on credible victim testimony and corroborative medical evidence.
Atul Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord based on a full settlement and mutual consent divorce application, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile.
Abhineet Jain & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord following an amicable settlement and reconciliation between the parties.
Amit Malik & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties settled disputes amicably and obtained a mutual consent divorce.
Rajiv Sharma v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties settled their disputes through mediation and obtained a mutual consent divorce.