Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Subrata Roy Sahara v. State & Anr

20 Sep 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:8242
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed petitioners to withdraw their petitions with liberty to raise defenses at trial and directed that exemption from personal appearance be decided by the trial court.

criminal appeal_dismissed withdrawal of petition criminal trial exemption from personal appearance trial court procedure

Gaon Sabha Nanakheri v. Sucheta Memorial Trust

20 Sep 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:6111

The Delhi High Court held that construction of boundary walls up to five feet is permissible on agricultural lands governed by Section 81 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, as there is no express or implied prohibition against such construction.

property other Significant Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 Section 81 boundary wall agricultural land

Suresh Kumar Michandani v. Shyam Sunder Lal Jain

20 Sep 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:6113

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree for possession and mesne profits against a tenant with admitted arrears, dismissing the tenant's appeals as frivolous and emphasizing the landlord's right to sue despite co-ownership and absence of registered lease.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant tenancy possession mesne profits Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

Punjab National Bank v. M.L. Bansal

20 Sep 2018 · Siddharth Mridul; Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:6110-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the modification of a removal penalty to compulsory retirement in disciplinary proceedings due to procedural irregularities and long delay, affirming the Court's power to substitute penalties in exceptional cases.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant judicial review disciplinary proceedings penalty substitution removal from service

M/S RAJ BUILDERS v. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL

20 Sep 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:6112

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to expand arbitration reference beyond a settled full and final settlement upheld by the Supreme Court, holding that subsequent arbitration references do not revive settled claims.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration full and final settlement reference to arbitration coercion

Sarkar Daulat Madar Makbuja v. Union of India & Ors.

20 Sep 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:6125

The Delhi High Court held that appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act against orders on References under Sections 30-31 attract ad valorem court fees under Section 8 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, and directed payment of such fees on the difference claimed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 54 appeal Sections 30-31 Reference

R P Singh v. Anoop

20 Sep 2018 · J. R. Midha · 2018:DHC:6127

The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded to an injured worker under the Employees’ Compensation Act, dismissed the employer's appeal, and imposed a penalty after ensuring procedural fairness.

labor appeal_dismissed Employees’ Compensation Act employment injury compensation penalty

Rail Vikas Nigam Ltd. v. Cobra Instalaciones y Servicios, S.A.

20 Sep 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:6126

The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitral award allowing recovery of Rs. 2 crores adjusted without free consent, holding that consent obtained under economic duress is void, but upheld other claims relating to payment and price variation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 undue influence economic duress Indian Contract Act, 1872

Joy Creators Pvt Ltd v. Natures Essence Pvt Ltd

20 Sep 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:6114

The Delhi High Court granted partial injunction restraining the defendant from using the plaintiff’s bottle shape and slogan, allowing descriptive use of 'Almond and Honey' only with lesser prominence than the defendant’s trademark to avoid passing off.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off descriptive term trade dress

V. Saravanan v. M/S. Rishikesh Hire Purchase and Leasing Company Pvt. Ltd

20 Sep 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:6136

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting contractual interest at 36% per annum on unsecured short-term loans, rejecting the petitioner's challenge that the interest was exorbitant and against public policy.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Interest Rate Contractual Interest Public Policy

Jindal Poly Film Ltd v. Designated Authority & Anr.

20 Sep 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:6108-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a termination order by the Designated Authority under anti-dumping rules is a final determinative order appealable under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, and thus a writ petition challenging it is not maintainable.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Customs Tariff Act, 1975 Section 9C Anti-dumping duty Designated Authority

Delhi & District Cricket Association v. Vinod Tihara & Ors.

20 Sep 2018 · Anu Malhotra · 2018:DHC:6117

The Delhi High Court upheld the interim stay on the suspension of the DDCA Secretary, ruling that the Board lacked authority to suspend him without a pending Ombudsman inquiry and prior hearing.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant suspension of elected office bearer Articles of Association Ombudsman inquiry principles of natural justice

M v. State of NCT & Anr

20 Sep 2018 · S. Muralidhar; I.S. Mehta · 2018:DHC:6109-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court emphasized the paramountcy of the child's welfare in a cross-border custody dispute involving conflicting parental rights, dual citizenship, and passport validity, reserving final custody orders pending further proceedings.

family other Significant custody of minor child habeas corpus welfare of child natural guardian

Sanjeev v. Madhubala & Ors.

20 Sep 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:6133

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging execution of possession decrees, holding that title issues conclusively decided by the Supreme Court cannot be re-litigated in execution and that subsequent documents of title are subject to lis pendens.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Execution proceedings Lis pendens Transfer of Property Act Section 52 Title dispute

Poonam Bhardwaj v. Ashish Abrol

20 Sep 2018 · Hima Kohli; V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:6107-DB

The Delhi High Court held that interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act must be payable from the date of the application unless reasons justify otherwise, and reviewed its earlier order to align with this settled legal principle.

family petition_allowed Significant interim maintenance Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act date of application date of order

Prem Lata Gupta v. Gaon Sabha, Mundka

20 Sep 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:6132

The Delhi High Court upheld the apportionment of compensation favoring the Gaon Sabha as recorded bhumidhar under the Delhi Land Reforms Act, dismissing the appellant's claim based solely on a sale deed and mutation without proof of possession.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 bhumidhari possession

Dilip Kaushik v. Central Bureau of Investigation

20 Sep 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:6128

The Delhi High Court directed that the trial court must examine evidence on the validity of prosecution sanction, including testimony of the sanctioning authority and investigating officer, and pass a reasoned order before proceeding with trial under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal other Significant validity of sanction Prevention of Corruption Act Section 19 PC Act Section 482 CrPC

Vimla Ghosh v. Union of India & Anr

20 Sep 2018 · Hima Kohli; Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:6123-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the executive’s policy fixing the age of superannuation of NCC Girl Cadet Instructors at 55 years, ruling that courts cannot direct policy changes or legislate on such matters.

administrative petition_dismissed age of superannuation National Cadet Corps Girl Cadet Instructor executive policy

Manoj Kumar Shukla v. The Govt. NCT of Delhi & Anr.

20 Sep 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:6124

The Delhi High Court held that a party to divorce by mutual consent retains the right to withdraw consent before the decree is granted, and thus refused to quash the FIR or declare domestic violence proceedings infructuous when the respondent withdrew cooperation.

family petition_dismissed Significant divorce by mutual consent Section 13B Hindu Marriage Act withdrawal of consent quashing of FIR

2889f071d55ecd6aaa8c2532d4af043f072ede30a921ea432252e865bb76b054

20 Sep 2018

The High Court dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation, affirming that appeals must be filed within prescribed time unless sufficient cause is shown under Section 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Section 65 Appeal limitation Dismissal of appeal