Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Sanjeev Sahdev v. The State
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner a further extension to deposit the fine imposed under Section 138 NI Act but refused to entertain any challenge to the quantum of fine after withdrawal of earlier petitions.
Sanjeev Sahdev v. The State
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner further time to deposit the fine imposed under Section 138 NI Act after withdrawal of petitions challenging the fine, emphasizing that the quantum of fine cannot be re-agitated but extension of time may be allowed.
RFB Latex Private Limited v. Central Board of Trustees
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable, directing the petitioner to seek condonation of delay and interim relief from the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal.
M/S Ratna Infrastructure Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Meja Urja Nigam Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted a limited extension of time for the Sole Arbitrator to make awards in two arbitration cases while upholding the postponement of awards to avoid conflicting decisions pending a related arbitration.
PT Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper Tbk v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Designated Authority to allow the petitioner to make written submissions addressing adverse observations in the anti-dumping disclosure statement before final findings, emphasizing judicial review safeguards in ongoing quasi-judicial proceedings.
B.M. Batish v. UOI Through Lt. Governor & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CAT's order to refix seniority in accordance with binding Division Bench and Supreme Court rulings, holding that acquisition of a degree alone does not confer automatic seniority or promotion.
Pankaj Sales Corporation v. Indra Jain Industries
The Delhi High Court dismissed the execution petition, holding that the decree restrained only the use of specific registered trademarks and not the label claimed by the decree holder.
Neelam Sharma v. Food Corporation of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award favoring FCI for damages on unmilled paddy, holding such claims unsustainable due to government policy and prior settlements, and upheld the validity of ex-parte proceedings where proper notice was given.
Food Corporation of India v. M/S Ashok Rice Mills & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitrator's rejection of FCI's claim for penal economic cost on unmilled paddy sold under government policy, while setting aside the miller's counter-claims for failure to account for unmilled paddy.
M/S Sigma Exports v. State Bank of Patiala
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a suit seeking recovery of a mistaken bank credit where the plaintiff was aware of non-payment by the foreign buyer and the bank had not received any payment.
Prashant Antil v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused under Section 376 IPC, finding a prima facie case of false implication and imposing conditions to safeguard the trial.
Food Corporation of India v. M/S Guru Nanak Mills & Its Partners
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitrator's award valuing missing paddy at FCI's open market price, allowed recovery of arbitration costs from the millers, and set aside an unreasoned counter-claim award.
M/S XTREME PERFUMES AND PERSONAL CARE PVT LTD v. EMPLOYEE PROVIDENT FUND OREGANIZATION AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that non-compliance with a pre-deposit order justifies dismissal of an appeal but allowed the petitioner time to comply and have the appeal heard on merits.
Harvinder Singh & Anr. v. The Commissioner of Police & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of petitions seeking quashing of complaints under Sections 409, 420, and 120B IPC based on amicable settlement but upheld police discretion to continue investigation into broader implications.
Durgesh Pratap Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a public interest writ petition seeking a general restraint on media reporting of #MeToo allegations, holding that such restraint orders can only be granted in specific cases upon application by aggrieved individuals.
MrPramod Ahuja, Advocate. v. GOVT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI &ANR
Delhi High Court directs DSIIDC to convert industrial sheds from leasehold to freehold upon payment of conversion charges despite dispute with DDA over entitlement to those charges.
Sunita Aggarwal & Ors. v. Ankit Jain Alias Sonu & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an oral family settlement relinquishing rights in immovable property is valid without registration, but a preliminary decree on admissions cannot be granted without clear, unambiguous admissions, requiring trial to adjudicate the dispute.
Through v. PRESIDENT, NATIONAL WATER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking directions to formulate employee benefit rules, directing petitioners to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal instead.
Anil Shastri v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside a travel ban and quashed the Look Out Circular against the petitioner after investigation concluded and a cancellation report was pending.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi - 8 v. M/S Samtel Machines and Projects Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals against M/s Samtel Machines and Projects Ltd.'s income tax assessments for AY 2008-09 and 2009-10, as the Revenue conceded no exempt income was earned, negating any substantial question of law.