Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Sandeep Agarwal v. Priyanka Agarwal

31 Oct 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2018:DHC:7063-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's order enhancing maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, ruling that reasonable income assessment and modest expense claims need not be supported by documentary evidence.

family appeal_dismissed maintenance Hindu Marriage Act Section 24 income assessment

M/S. METRO BEARINGS v. MRS. FAIZUNNISA & ORS.

31 Oct 2018 · Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:7057

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, affirming the presumption of bona fide requirement by the landlord and dismissing the tenant's revision petition despite counsel's negligence.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement eviction Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e)

Vodafone Mobile Services Limited v. Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi

31 Oct 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:7058-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that telecom towers and shelters are immovable property and not eligible for CENVAT credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, affirming the binding precedents of the Bombay High Court.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant CENVAT credit immovable property telecom towers Base Transmission System

Jindal Metal Co. v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-21

31 Oct 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Prateek Jalan · 2018:DHC:7059-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition upholding the validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 147 initiated by valid service of notice under Section 148 despite the petitioner's claims of non-service and jurisdictional defects.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 notice Section 147 reassessment Service of notice

Kamal Rastogi & Ors. v. M/s Excel Crop Care Ltd. & Anr.

31 Oct 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2018:DHC:7060-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay and the appeal, holding that negligence of counsel and inaction by the appellants did not constitute sufficient cause to excuse a 1084-day delay in filing the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay sufficient cause limitation Order IX Rule 13 CPC

Dr. Satya Bhushan Jain and Anr. v. University of Delhi and Ors.

30 Oct 2018 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2018:DHC:8841

The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to decide on the petitioners' pension and retirement benefits claims within three weeks and disposed of the writ petitions.

administrative other pension retirement benefits Office Memorandum 1987 University of Delhi

Tejveer & Ors v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

30 Oct 2018 · Najmi Waziri

The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs under Sections 307, 506, 308, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between related parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC after prima facie assessment of the case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 307 IPC

TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. USHA & ANR

30 Oct 2018 · Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:9160

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal and upheld the compensation award, holding that the insurer cannot avoid liability on the ground of invalid driving licence without evidence or proper cross-examination.

civil appeal_dismissed Employees' Compensation insurance liability driving licence cross-examination

USV PVT LTD v. Union of India

30 Oct 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:8824

The Delhi High Court held that notices of demand for alleged overcharging must be treated as show cause notices, allowing the petitioner an opportunity to respond before any final order, and directed release of interim deposits.

administrative appeal_allowed notice of demand show cause notice ceiling price overcharging

Court on Its Own Motion v. Inspector Manoj Kumar

30 Oct 2018 · Siddharth Mridul; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:7001-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a bonafide language error in a police status report without wilful intent to mislead does not amount to criminal contempt, discharging the contempt notice against the SHO while emphasizing the need for diligence in court filings.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant criminal contempt false affidavit status report deliberate misstatement

Jagjeet Singh v. Sajjan Singh

30 Oct 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:6980

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition and acquitted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act following settlement and compliance with Supreme Court guidelines on compounding.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque bounce Compounding offence Settlement

Anmol Kumar Singh & Anr v. State NCT of Delhi

30 Oct 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:6982

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners in a case of simple assault after parties settled their dispute and petitioners complied with investigation conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail simple injuries settlement interim protection

Inderjeet v. State

30 Oct 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:6976-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentences of two appellants for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including forensic, medical, and call data records.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence murder Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC

Ajit Singh v. Union of India; Naveen Kumar v. Union of India

30 Oct 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Sanjeev Narula

The Delhi High Court quashed vague show cause notices alleging examination malpractice against candidates and directed their appointment, affirming that natural justice requires specific disclosure of allegations to enable effective replies.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant show cause notice principles of natural justice malpractice in examination Staff Selection Commission

Saket Singh & Ors. v. Girdhari Lal

30 Oct 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:6987

The Delhi High Court quashed a complaint under the SC/ST Act and summoning order as mala fide and an abuse of process, where key accused were proven absent during the alleged incident.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of complaint Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 482 Cr.P.C. mala fide complaint

Gaurav Goel v. Shiv Shankar Singhal

30 Oct 2018 · Jayant Nath · 2018:DHC:7018 CS(OS) 468/2018

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's injunction application holding that oral assurances and unregistered documents cannot confer ownership rights in immovable property under the Registration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Registration Act 1908 Section 17 Section 49 immovable property

State v. Fatima

30 Oct 2018 · Najmi Waziri · 2018:DHC:7019

The Delhi High Court upheld the illegality of contraband recovery due to defective Section 50 notice and absence of independent witnesses, dismissing the State's appeal in an NDPS case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 50 NDPS Act Search and seizure Contraband recovery Legal rights of accused

Vipin Bhardwaj v. Ashok Bhalla

30 Oct 2018 · Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:7007

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of an application to set aside an ex-parte decree, emphasizing the necessity of legal diligence and formal settlement documentation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant ex-parte decree setting aside judgment oral settlement Order IX Rule 13 CPC

Vinod Chopra v. Vasudev Chopra & Anr.

30 Oct 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2018:DHC:7010-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application for condonation of 585 days delay in filing an appeal, holding that illness and financial difficulties without sufficient explanation do not constitute sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act sufficient cause reasonable diligence

Umesh Verma & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

30 Oct 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:7014

The Delhi High Court directed transfer of delayed cross FIR investigations to the Economic Offences Wing for simultaneous and expeditious probe under its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal other Section 482 Cr.P.C. FIR Economic Offences Wing Simultaneous investigation