Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Rudra Pal Singh v. State

31 Oct 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:7023

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a security guard accused of firing upon a victim, emphasizing absence of mens rea and suspending his arms license pending trial.

criminal appeal_allowed regular bail mens rea accidental injury arms license suspension

Ran Singh v. State

31 Oct 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:7024

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to a police officer accused of rape under Section 376 IPC, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and absence of retraction in the prosecutrix's statement.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 376 IPC false implication honey trap

Parveen Kumar v. State

31 Oct 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:7025

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case involving minor injuries and alleged false implication, emphasizing the completion of investigation and imposing conditions to safeguard the trial.

criminal appeal_allowed regular bail false implication minor injuries chargesheet

Joginder @ Mintu v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

31 Oct 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:7022-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentences of three accused for kidnapping, ransom, and murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including voice samples and forged documents.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence continuing offence ransom calls voice sample evidence

Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. State of UP & Ors.

31 Oct 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:7021-DB

The Delhi High Court directed public disclosure of the original CB-CID enquiry report on the Hashimpura massacre but declined to order a further investigation in the absence of new evidence.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Hashimpura massacre Special Investigating Agency CB-CID enquiry report public disclosure

Zulfikar Nasir & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

31 Oct 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:7020-DB

The Delhi High Court overturned the acquittal of PAC personnel involved in the 1987 Hashimpura massacre, convicting them based on circumstantial and additional evidence proving targeted killings of unarmed civilians.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Hashimpura massacre Provincial Armed Constabulary circumstantial evidence eyewitness testimony

The Director General (Works) CPWD v. The General Secretary CPWD Mazdoor Union

31 Oct 2018 · C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:7067

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award granting regularization with consequential benefits to a daily rated worker reinstated by final orders, limiting retrospective effect to the employer's policy date.

labor petition_dismissed Significant regularization daily rated worker work order employee Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-10 v. M/s Indian Farm Forestry Development

31 Oct 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2018:DHC:7069-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the deduction of social development project expenses under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, holding such expenditure wholly and exclusively for business purposes despite benefiting third parties.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 37(1) Income Tax Act business expenditure commercial expediency capital vs revenue expenditure

Suresh Kumar v. D.T.C.

31 Oct 2018 · C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:7070

The Delhi High Court upheld the disciplinary penalty imposed on a bus driver for misconduct involving fare evasion, holding that the inquiry complied with natural justice and findings of fact by the Industrial Tribunal are not liable to interference under writ jurisdiction.

labor petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary inquiry principles of natural justice industrial dispute fare evasion

Pankaj Dayal v. Sobhagya Mal Jain

31 Oct 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2018:DHC:7072-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of 690 days delay in filing an appeal due to lack of sufficient cause, holding that negligence of counsel is attributable to the litigant and delay caused by carelessness cannot be condoned.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act 1963 negligence of counsel Order XLI Rule 3A CPC

Pankaj Dayal v. Sushil Jain

31 Oct 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2018:DHC:7071-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of 664 days delay in filing an appeal due to lack of sufficient cause and negligence on part of the appellant, thereby dismissing the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay limitation act sufficient cause negligence of counsel

National Highways Authority of India v. ITD-SDB(JV)

31 Oct 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:7055

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award directing refund of liquidated damages, payment for additional pile testing, release of withheld amounts, and interest, affirming that procedural lapses do not bar substantiated claims under contract and arbitration law.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 liquidated damages Dispute Review Board contract variations

MMTC LTD. v. M/S KARAM CHAND THAPAR & BROS. (COAL SALES) LTD.

31 Oct 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:7054

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting the respondent despatch payments, bank guarantee charges, and interest, dismissing the petition challenging the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Despatch and Demurrage Section 34 Arbitration Act Interest on Award

Bombay Rayon Fashions Ltd v. Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.

31 Oct 2018 · Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:7053

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order permitting re-examination to produce a license agreement clarifying subsidiary status in a trademark infringement suit, holding that re-examination under Section 138 IEA can include new matters with court permission.

civil petition_dismissed Significant re-examination Section 138 Indian Evidence Act Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC license agreement

Radhey Shyam & Anr. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

31 Oct 2018 · J.R. Midha · 2018:DHC:7050
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held NDMC primarily liable to pay Rs. 10 lakh compensation with interest for death of a minor due to electrocution in a public park, applying established precedents on municipal liability and compensation.

civil petition_allowed Significant compensation electrocution public park municipal liability

Sudha Jhanwar v. State

31 Oct 2018 · J.R. Midha · 2018:DHC:7051

The Delhi High Court granted Letters of Administration for the joint Will dated 21st July, 2002 after the claimant of a subsequent disputed Will withdrew his petition, resolving the family dispute through mediation.

civil appeal_allowed joint Will Letters of Administration Indian Succession Act, 1925 probate

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sunder & Ors.

31 Oct 2018 · J. R. Midha · 2018:DHC:7052

The Delhi High Court upheld a 50% functional disability assessment and total compensation of Rs.12,20,115/- in a personal injury claim, adjusting pain and suffering compensation and setting aside counsel fees.

civil appeal_dismissed functional disability loss of earning capacity compensation pain and suffering

Arun International v. Oriental Bank of Commerce & Anr.

31 Oct 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:7061

The Delhi High Court rejected the plaint challenging SARFAESI Act notices for non-payment of proper court fees and maintainability issues, emphasizing the requirement of ad valorem court fees and the limitations on declaratory relief under the Specific Relief Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant court fees declaratory relief SARFAESI Act Section 13(2)

Parsvnath Developers Limited & Anr. v. Rail Land Development Authority

31 Oct 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:7062

The court held that the arbitration agreement survives an arbitral award and appointed the respondent's nominee arbitrator, leaving merits issues like res judicata and estoppel to be decided by the arbitral tribunal.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Agreement Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Nominee Arbitrator Appointment Res Judicata

Vodafone Mobile Services Limited v. Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi

31 Oct 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:7065-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed appeals of telecom infrastructure service providers, holding that service tax is not leviable on their services and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Service Tax Telecom Infrastructure Services Taxability Revenue Demand