Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
B. G. Shirke Construction Technology Pvt. Ltd. v. Army Welfare Housing Organisation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award applying a revised minimum wage rate published prior to tender submission for price escalation, affirming the limited scope of judicial interference under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act.
M/S KING DORIAN EXPORTS v. DUDH NAAT
The Delhi High Court allowed setting aside of an ex parte labour award for non-service of notice, subject to full deposit of the awarded amount and costs, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Kings Dorian Exports v. Irfan
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to set aside an ex parte labour award for non-service of notice, subject to depositing the full awarded amount and costs, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Saroj & Ors. v. Axis E Corp Solutions Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the referral court’s role under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and that issues regarding non-signatories’ status must be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal.
Ravinder Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a government servant fully exonerated and reinstated is entitled to full pay and allowances for the dismissal period under FR 54(2), rejecting the 'no work no pay' principle in such cases.
Usha Devi and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking compassionate allowance to the family of a CISF officer removed from service for misconduct, holding that no special circumstances existed to grant pensionary benefits under Rule 41 of the CCS Pension Rules.
NDMC v. Vijay Laxmi
The Delhi High Court held that an employee is entitled to interest on delayed salary payments caused by employer's administrative lapses, setting aside the Tribunal's denial of interest on salary delay.
AXIS FINANCE LIMITED v. PADMANABHA PRASAD CHAKRADHARA VENKATA SANKA PROPRIETOR: LALITHA TRADERS
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of the arbitration agreement without delving into the merits of the dispute.
AXIS FINANCE LIMITED v. NUTHAN PEREIRA
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into merits or frivolity of claims.
Mohsin Khan v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an application to recall witnesses for further cross-examination in a POCSO case, holding that vague and non-specific requests without material basis cannot justify recall under Section 348 of BNSS, 2023.
Shishu Pal Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a Magistrate lacking territorial jurisdiction must return the complaint to the proper court instead of dismissing it, and allowed the petitioner to re-present the complaint before the competent authority.
Jyoti Panchal and Anr. v. Deepak Panchal
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's interim maintenance order granting ₹8,000 per month each to the wife and her minor son, affirming the prima facie income assessment and stepfather's potential liability for maintenance.
Kartik v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application for suspension of sentence in a sexual offence case involving a minor, affirming the primacy of school records for age determination and emphasizing strict standards for suspension in serious offences under the POCSO Act.
Md. Shahnawaz v. State GNCT
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for robbery and possession of stolen property but modified the sentence to the period already served considering mitigating factors.
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), GURUGRAM v. PANCHAM REALCON PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the ITAT's and CIT(A)'s findings that the assessee satisfactorily explained large cash deposits during demonetization, negating addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
Sunil Kumar v. The Director General- S.S.B
The Delhi High Court allowed correction of typographical errors in a judgment to accurately reflect the matrimonial case number in a divorce proceeding.
Sunil Kumar v. The Director General- S.S.B
The Delhi High Court held that contracting a second marriage after a binding ex parte divorce decree and before any appeal is not bigamy, quashing the petitioner’s removal from SSB service and ordering reinstatement.
Future Art and Display v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/AVATO, Ward 94 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST notifications and adjudication order, allowing the petitioner to file appeal pending Supreme Court's decision on notification validity.
Aalim v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging unauthorized construction by an unrelated petitioner, condemning misuse of judicial process for extortion and directing police investigation into multiple frivolous petitions concerning the same property.
Bakhtawar Ahmad Rather v. Airport Authority of India
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11(6) stage, the Court's role is limited to verifying the existence of an arbitration agreement and limitation compliance, leaving substantive issues like time barring and accord and satisfaction to the arbitral tribunal, and accordingly appointed the sole arbitrator.