Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

The Management of Patel Integrated Logistics Limited v. Satbir Singh & Anr.

11 Aug 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:7038-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the employer’s appeal, holding that the transfer of a union office bearer was lawful administrative action not tainted by mala fide or victimization.

labor appeal_allowed Significant transfer of employee administrative exigency mala fide transfer union office bearer

WG CDR Tejbir Singh v. Union of India and Ors

11 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6971-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an officer awarded 'severe displeasure' cannot be denied study leave absent a DV ban, quashing the denial based on Clause 32(f) of AFO 05/25 and clarifying the Armed Forces Tribunal's lack of jurisdiction over leave matters.

administrative petition_allowed Significant study leave severe displeasure Armed Forces Order 05/2025 disciplinary penalty

MS MAHESH GUPTA v. GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRSTHA UNIVERSITY

11 Aug 2025 · C. HARI SHANKAR; OM PRAKASH SHUKLA · 2025:DHC:6767-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition after the release of pensionary benefits, disposing of the petition as infructuous.

administrative petition_allowed writ petition pensionary benefits withdrawal of petition infructuous petition

Union of India v. Dr. Vishnu Swarup Gupta

11 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6865-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing refund of excess Transport Allowance recovered from a retired government servant's gratuity without prior notice, relying on Supreme Court guidelines prohibiting such recovery post-retirement.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Transport Allowance Recovery from gratuity Retiral dues Government servant

Tushar Ranjan Mohanty v. Union of India

11 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6756-DB

The Delhi High Court held that failure to pass a specific order under Fundamental Rule 54-B(1) at the time of revoking suspension entitles the government servant to full pay and allowances for the suspension period.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Fundamental Rule 54-B suspension pay and allowances reinstatement

Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Dr Om Prakash

11 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6735-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting AGP Rs. 10,000 to lecturers under earlier AICTE regulations, holding the 2019 notification applies prospectively and does not bar their promotion benefits.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Academic Grade Pay Career Advancement Scheme AICTE Regulations Promotion eligibility

Kumar Yadav v. Krishan Kumar

11 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6708-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside the termination of a government employee without a Show-Cause Notice, emphasizing adherence to natural justice despite allegations of recruitment irregularities.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant termination of service Show-Cause Notice natural justice Central Administrative Tribunal

Guddi Devi & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

11 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC Online SC 290
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking compassionate appointment for the younger son of a deceased CISF employee, holding that such relief cannot be granted after a decade and where the claimant's mother's marriage was declared void.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant compassionate appointment void marriage post-retiral benefits no objection certificate

Ajit Singh v. Rahul Rasgotra & Ors.

11 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6771-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition as the order alleged to have been disobeyed was complied with, rendering the petition infructuous.

criminal petition_dismissed contempt petition compliance court order disposal

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Sh. Ram Asre and Ors

11 Aug 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:6831

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal challenging liability and disability assessment in a motor accident compensation case, granting stay subject to deposit of awarded amount.

motor_accident_compensation appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 functional disability compensation

Radhey Traders v. Assistant Commissioner Laxmi Nagar Division CGST Delhi East Commissionerate

11 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6792-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging GST tax demands arising from fraudulent misuse of the petitioner's GST registration, holding that factual investigations are for police authorities and the petitioner cannot claim complete innocence after voluntarily sharing OTP facilitating misuse.

tax petition_dismissed GST registration misuse Input Tax Credit Show Cause Notice OTP misuse

M/S V R IMPEX v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax and Anr

11 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6789-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration without prior notice and reasons is impermissible and directed cancellation to operate only from the Show Cause Notice date.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration retrospective cancellation Section 29(2) CGST Act principles of natural justice

MYNA HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED v. PREETI BANSAL

11 Aug 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:6816

The Delhi High Court held that the Plaintiff failed to demonstrate genuine urgency to exempt pre-institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, dismissing the suit as premature and not maintainable.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 12A Commercial Courts Act pre-institution mediation urgent interim relief specific performance

Balaji Freight Carriers Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

11 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6742-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order due to non-communication of the Show Cause Notice, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST portal Additional Notices Tab Section 168A GST Act

Shri Sugan Traders v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax

11 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6736-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST demand orders for fraudulent ITC, holding that the petitioner must pursue the statutory appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit GST Section 107 CGST Act Writ petition maintainability

Bhanu Pratap v. Vimal Aggarwal

11 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6807

The Delhi High Court allowed the judgment debtor's petition to keep the auction of attached property in abeyance until payment of the decretal amount is made by a specified date, subject to initial deposit and phased payment.

civil petition_allowed decretal amount execution proceedings attachment auction

Dalip Kumar v. Registrar, Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, New Delhi & Ors.

11 Aug 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:6773

The Delhi High Court held that statutory Recruitment Rules govern promotion eligibility and cannot be overridden by executive instructions, entitling the petitioner to promotion consideration upon completing eight years’ service as Court Master.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Recruitment Rules Promotion eligibility Office Memorandum 6th Pay Commission

Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board v. Trilok Singh

11 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6804
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an ex parte injunction directing the Trial Court to expeditiously decide the pending application to set aside the injunction before appellate intervention.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural ex parte injunction Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC Section 151 CPC interim injunction

Harman Preet Singh v. Inderjeet Kaur & Anr.

11 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6785

The High Court dismissed the petition seeking impleadment of the petitioner as a defendant in a possession suit, holding that he was neither a necessary nor proper party and must pursue separate legal remedies.

civil petition_dismissed impleadment necessary party proper party dominus litis

Neena Khanna v. Wenger & Co & Ors

11 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6794

The Delhi High Court held that permission to lead secondary evidence cannot be denied without allowing the party to lead foundational evidence during trial, directing the trial court to reconsider the application accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant secondary evidence Section 65 Indian Evidence Act foundational facts admissibility of evidence