Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Alka Singh v. Rakesh Kumar Singh

13 Aug 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:7536

The High Court directed expeditious hearing of a counter-claim pending for over a year with repeated adjournments, refusing to interfere with the trial court's dismissal of the petitioner's application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.

civil other Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC Section 115 CPC specific performance counter-claim

Virender Kumar v. Ashok Kumar Bajaj

13 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6559

The Delhi High Court allowed correction of an inadvertent error in recording counsel appearance by treating the actual advocate's appearance as valid and issuing a corrigendum.

other other correction of record appearance of counsel clerical error inadvertent oversight

Preeti Jain & Ors. v. Alka Saxena & Anr.

13 Aug 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:6940

The High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition accordingly.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC revision petition interim order final order

M/s Ram Niwas Goel v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

13 Aug 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:6934

The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to comply with prior orders by issuing a timely hearing and speaking order on the petitioner’s contractor registration revalidation and Show Cause Notice proceedings.

administrative other Show Cause Notice Principles of Natural Justice Revalidation of Registration Competent Authority

Sushil Kumar Chauhan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

13 Aug 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:6851

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection and de-sealing of a property with unauthorized construction predating 1st June 2014 under the Delhi Special Laws Act, pending appeal before the Appellate Tribunal MCD.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Special Laws Act unauthorized construction vacation notice sealing order

Naushad @ Bombay v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

13 Aug 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:6852
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside convictions for robbery due to material contradictions in the complainant's testimony and non-production of crucial evidence, acquitting the appellants.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant robbery Section 392 IPC Section 397 IPC contradictions in testimony

Jaswinder Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

12 Aug 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:6777

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for aggravated penetrative sexual assault of a child under the POCSO Act, affirming that credible child victim testimony suffices for conviction despite absence of forensic corroboration.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act child sexual assault child witness testimony Section 29 POCSO presumption

A.K. Basak v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

12 Aug 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:6795

The Delhi High Court declined to direct police registration of a complaint in a neighbourly harassment dispute but ordered police to provide contact details for urgent assistance.

criminal petition_dismissed writ of mandamus police protection harassment neighbour dispute

Pawan Dabas and Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi Through SHO & Anr.

12 Aug 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:6781

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and the complainant's unwillingness to continue prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC settlement domestic dispute

Sandeep Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

12 Aug 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:6759

Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused alleged to have forcibly dispossessed the complainant and stolen property, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation and discouraging self-help remedies.

criminal appeal_dismissed anticipatory bail forcible dispossession stolen property civil remedy

Anil Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)

12 Aug 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:6796

The Delhi High Court allowed parole for sixty days to a prisoner entitled to furlough, emphasizing the State’s prior stand and the urgency of attending post-death rituals.

criminal petition_allowed parole furlough Delhi Prisons Rules Section 302 IPC

Atul Tiwari v. State NCT of Delhi

12 Aug 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:6772

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a sexual offence case, holding that prima facie evidence indicated a consensual relationship and lack of corroboration on serious allegations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail consensual relationship sexual assault Section 376 IPC

Kubota Corporation v. Godabari Agro Machinery and Services India Private Limited & Ors.

12 Aug 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:6734
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court holds it has territorial jurisdiction over patent infringement suit based on offer for sale and delivery of impugned product within Delhi, dismissing defendant's application to return plaint.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction Order VII Rule 10 CPC patent infringement offer for sale

Pankaj Yadav and Diskha Narula v. State NCT of Delhi

12 Aug 2025 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2025:DHC:6718

The Delhi High Court held that preservation of electronic evidence including CDRs is necessary and desirable under section 91 Cr.P.C. to ensure a fair trial, overruling the magistrate's dismissal and balancing privacy concerns with procedural fairness.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant section 91 CrPC preservation of evidence Call Detail Records right to fair trial

Chetan Manchanda v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

12 Aug 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:6780

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 377, 323, and 506 IPC following a full compromise and dissolution of marriage between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC compromise in matrimonial dispute Section 482 CrPC

M/S LAULS PVT LIMITED v. SMT GEETA & ORS

12 Aug 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:7905

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte decree for non-production of documents due to sufficient cause including COVID-19 disruptions, remanding the matter for limited adjudication on insurance policy breach and recovery rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex-parte decree Order IX Rule 13 CPC sufficient cause motor accident claim

M/S ELEMENTTO LIFESTYLES v. MR. DEEPAK SINGH BORA

12 Aug 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:5684

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte Labour Court award of reinstatement with full back wages for lack of reasoned findings and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication applying settled principles on workman status and back wages.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 workman definition back wages reasoned award

M/S S.P. Electronics and Battery Products v. Mukesh Kumar

12 Aug 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:7532

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte labour award due to lack of notice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication ensuring compliance with natural justice.

labor appeal_allowed Significant ex-parte award natural justice notice intimation

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. NAGARJUNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD

12 Aug 2025 · V. KAMESWAR RAO; VINOD KUMAR · 2025:DHC:6782-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award holding that disputes on responsibility for delay are arbitrable and decisions on quantum of compensation alone are final under the contract.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration arbitral award arbitrability Superintending Engineer

State v. Reena

12 Aug 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:7344

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's lenient sentence for possession of intermediate quantity of ganja, emphasizing mitigating factors and the accused's voluntary plea of guilt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act intermediate quantity Section 20 NDPS Section 77 JJ Act