Delhi High Court

49,110 judgments

Year:

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4 v. Gaursons Realty Private Limited

17 Jan 2019 · Sanjiv Khanna; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2019:DHC:349-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court issued notice on the Revenue's appeal challenging the Tribunal's deletion of disallowance of interest expenditure, emphasizing that interest on borrowed funds is deductible if loans to sister companies are given as a measure of commercial expediency.

tax other Significant Interest expenditure Income Tax Act 1961 Section 36(1)(iii) Section 37

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -6, New Delhi v. NDR Promoters Pvt. Ltd.

17 Jan 2019 · Sanjiv Khanna; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2019:DHC:348

Delhi High Court allowed Revenue's appeal restoring addition under Section 68 for bogus share capital received through accommodation entries controlled by a single entity.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 68 Income Tax Act share capital addition accommodation entries bogus share capital

Rajan Bhatia v. Central Board of Direct Taxes & Anr.

17 Jan 2019 · Sanjiv Khanna; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2019:DHC:347-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 115BBDA and the proviso to Section 10(34) of the Income Tax Act, ruling that the tax on dividend income exceeding Rs. 10 lakh for specified resident assessees is not arbitrary or discriminatory under Article 14.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 115BBDA Section 10(34) Income Tax Act, 1961 dividend income tax

ENGINEERING PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD. v. GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY

17 Jan 2019 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2019:DHC:357

The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension for arbitration proceedings upon the petitioner's request, allowing the matter to proceed to conclusion.

civil petition_allowed arbitration proceedings extension of time arbitrator consent of parties

Shri Gian Chand v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

17 Jan 2019 · Vipin Sanghi; A.K. Chawla · 2019:DHC:356-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's claim for pay scale parity with Head of Department, holding that AICTE guidelines for teaching posts do not apply to Workshop Superintendent and pay upgradation is an executive prerogative.

service_law petition_dismissed AICTE guidelines Workshop Superintendent Head of Department pay scale revision

Mallcom (India) Limited v. Rakesh Kumar & Ors.

17 Jan 2019 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2019:DHC:358

The Delhi High Court upheld the plaintiffs' prior trademark rights and granted permanent injunction against defendants using a deceptively similar mark, while clarifying procedural aspects of summary judgment under CPC and High Court Rules.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off summary judgment Order XIII-A CPC

Sanjay Behari & Ors. v. IFCI

17 Jan 2019 · S. Muralidhar; Sanjeev Narula · 2019:DHC:361-DB

The Delhi High Court held that employees who retired under VRS 2008 are entitled to pension enhancement based on RBI pay scale revisions effective on their retirement date, overruling denial of retrospective benefits.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Voluntary Retirement Scheme Pension enhancement Retrospective pay revision Industrial Finance Corporation of India

Gulshan v. State

17 Jan 2019 · Siddharth Mridul; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2019:DHC:344-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for kidnapping and related offences, affirming the admissibility of fingerprint evidence without a Section 65B certificate and the reliability of identification by related witnesses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Identification evidence Fingerprint evidence Section 65B Indian Evidence Act Section 106 Indian Evidence Act

State v. Vijay

17 Jan 2019 · Siddharth Mridul; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2019:DHC:343-DB

The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused under Section 307 IPC, holding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt amid contradictions and unreliable forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 307 IPC Acquittal Appeal against acquittal Presumption of innocence

Smt. Sunita & Anr v. State & Ors.

17 Jan 2019 · Siddharth Mridul; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2019:DHC:342-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a dowry death case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove cruelty or dowry demand proximate to the death beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC harassment cruelty

Ankit Tripathi & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

17 Jan 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:359

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement and mutual divorce, applying the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Ishwar Singh ANR v. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies ANR

17 Jan 2019 · Vipin Sanghi; A.K. Chawla · 2019:DHC:362-DB

The Delhi High Court held that failure to forward audit reports does not attract disqualification under Section 35(7)(d) of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act and emphasized the necessity of natural justice and proper impleadment in election disputes.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 Section 35(7)(d) statutory audit disqualification

Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. GNCT of Delhi

17 Jan 2019 · Sanjiv Khanna; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Jayant Nath · 2019:DHC:340-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a Reference under Section 57 of the Indian Stamp Act is not maintainable in the absence of a specific instrument or case chargeable to stamp duty before the CCRA, dismissing the petition without deciding the merits.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Section 57 Reference Chief Controlling Revenue Authority stamp duty remission

Mool Chand v. Union of India & Ors.

17 Jan 2019 · S. Muralidhar; Sanjeev Narula · 2019:DHC:339-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking declaration of lapse of land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, holding that stale claims barred by laches and involving disputed facts cannot be revived, especially where the land forms part of an unauthorized colony.

property petition_dismissed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act land acquisition lapse of acquisition stale claims

Anil Verma v. Ashok Kumar

17 Jan 2019 · Vinod Goel · 2019:DHC:364

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted ex-parte injunction restraining the respondent from using the appellant's registered descriptive trademarks having acquired distinctiveness, emphasizing protection against dishonest adoption causing irreparable injury.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement descriptive trademark secondary meaning interim injunction

Faeem @ Bona v. The State of NCT of Delhi

17 Jan 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2020:DHC:316

The High Court held that age for juvenility must be calculated from the date of the offence, granting the petitioner juvenile status and directing trial by the Juvenile Justice Board.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant juvenile justice ossification test age determination benefit of doubt

Salman v. The State (Delhi Admn) Delhi & Anr

16 Jan 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:295

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement in a matrimonial dispute, applying inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute mediated settlement

Mohd Samim v. State

16 Jan 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:296

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner after the CBI filed a closure report in a criminal case involving multiple IPC charges, subject to furnishing bail bonds and sureties.

criminal bail_granted bail closure report CBI investigation Indian Penal Code Sections 365, 364A, 387, 420, 511, 468, 471

Rohit Gulati v. State (Govt. NCT of Delhi)

16 Jan 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:292

The Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in a theft case under Section 380 IPC after he complied with the investigation, making the interim protection from arrest absolute.

criminal bail_granted pre-arrest bail Section 380 IPC interim protection from arrest investigation

Amit Kumar v. TPIE New India Assurance Company Limited

16 Jan 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:7940

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking arrears of pay revision and benefits due to the petitioner’s failure to exercise the option within the stipulated time despite availability of the circular and portal access.

administrative petition_dismissed wage revision cost ratio limit option exercise arrears of pay