Delhi High Court
46,428 judgments
Sukash @ Sukesh Chandrashekar v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the petitioner accused of serious forgery and corruption offences, holding that actual interference with the judicial process justifies denial of bail.
Devender Kumar v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court held that it can grant extension of time to complete investigation under its inherent powers without reviewing its earlier order, balancing the right to speedy trial with the interest of justice.
Devender Kumar v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court held that it can grant extension of time to complete investigation under its inherent powers without reviewing its earlier order, balancing the right to speedy trial with the need for proper investigation.
C.B. Singh v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court set aside the convictions of MCD officials for criminal conspiracy and corruption related to unauthorized construction due to failure of prosecution to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt.
Kaushal Kumar Narula & Anr v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable mediated settlement, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC in a matrimonial dispute.
Jarnail Singh & Ors. v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC on settlement between parties, applying inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Bhuwan Sharma & Ors v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC based on an amicable mediated settlement in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Sunil Kumar & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the basis of amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Kamal @ Sachin & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, applying inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Lavkush & Ors. v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 323, 354-A, 509, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between neighbors, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC as per the principles in Parbatbhai Aahir v. State of Gujarat.
Devender Kumar v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court held that it can grant extension of time to complete investigation under its inherent powers without reviewing its final order, balancing the right to speedy trial with the interest of justice.
Amit Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 308 IPC based on reliable and corroborated evidence but modified the sentence to the period already served by the appellant.
Mohit Rajora @ Gotu v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the robbery convictions of appellants who were mere passengers and not identified as assailants, holding that mere presence without overt acts does not establish common intention under Section 34 IPC.
Mohit Rajora @ Gotu v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the robbery convictions of two appellants due to lack of evidence attributing overt acts to them and absence of common intention under Section 395/34 IPC.
Mahender v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging convictions for armed robbery, holding that minor contradictions in witness testimony do not vitiate the prosecution case when the accused were apprehended with stolen property and weapons.
Anupama Bansal v. Suraj Bhan Bansal & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld a decree on admissions invalidating a sale deed executed under a revoked power of attorney over HUF property and directed full accounting of revenue to the rightful owners.
Monu Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for tampering with electricity meters under Section 138 of the Electricity Act, 2003 based on credible eyewitness testimony and seizure of tampering instruments.
Shahnawaz @ Sanu v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction of Shahnawaz for robbery with a country-made pistol under Section 397 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act, finding the prosecution evidence credible and the defence improbable.
Allauddin v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 135 Electricity Act for theft of electricity, ruling that procedural irregularities and delay in complaint filing did not vitiate the prosecution where evidence proved illegal supply beyond reasonable doubt.
Hari Kishan v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and proceedings under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 against a petitioner for mere possession of a live cartridge without conscious knowledge, affirming that conscious possession is essential for criminal liability.