Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

M/S CEE VIDEO MOVIES v. M/S AMBALAKKARA FILMS

25 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:7342-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act as not maintainable since the impugned order directing registration of the plaint was not an appealable order under the statute.

civil appeal_dismissed Commercial Courts Act Section 13 appeal maintainability territorial jurisdiction

Ashok Kumar v. Union of India

25 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:7348-DB

The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Ex Constable Ashok Kumar BSF as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.

other petition_dismissed Procedural writ petition withdrawal dismissal High Court of Delhi

Ex-Constable Virender Singh v. Union of India

25 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:7337-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a disability pension is payable when a disability attributable to service is diagnosed years after joining, relying on Medical Board opinion and condoning delay in filing the petition.

administrative petition_allowed Significant disability pension service-related disability Medical Board opinion delay condonation

ASI (GD) Sunan J v. Union of India & Ors.

25 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:7339-DB

The petitioner withdrew the writ petition after the prayers were granted, leading to its disposal by the Delhi High Court.

other other writ petition withdrawal disposal High Court of Delhi

Vipin Saroha v. Union of India & Anr.

25 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:7343-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition after the respondents undertook to dispose of the petitioner’s appeal on merits within four weeks, reserving the petitioner’s right to challenge the decision.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition appeal disposal undertaking reasonable time

Dawn Express Courier Del Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

25 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:7378-DB

The Delhi High Court held that while pre-notice consultation under CGST Rules is discretionary, summons and hearing notices must be issued with reasonable notice to uphold natural justice, directing the petitioner to file a detailed reply and be heard before adjudication.

tax other Significant Goods and Services Tax Show Cause Notice Section 74(5) CGST Act Rule 142 CGST Rules

M/S Tirupati Steel v. Union of India

25 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:7392-DB

The Delhi High Court held that provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 83 of the CGST Act ceases after one year and ordered de-freezing of the petitioner's account.

tax petition_allowed Significant provisional attachment Section 83 CGST Act one year limitation bank account attachment

Shourya Towers Pvt. Ltd. v. Surjeet Singh & Ors.

25 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:7411

The Delhi High Court dismissed the builder's petition under Article 227, upholding consumer fora orders directing allotment of the flat to the complainant's heirs, affirming that cancellation was invalid due to builder's failure to fulfill contractual obligations.

civil petition_dismissed Significant consumer protection allotment cancellation contractual obligations supervisory jurisdiction

Rajvir Kaur v. Commissioner of Custom & Anr.

25 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that confiscation orders passed without Show Cause Notice and personal hearing violate natural justice and allowed release of seized gold jewellery on payment of fines and penalties to eligible passengers.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Show Cause Notice Natural Justice Baggage Rules, 2016

Dr. Punita K. Sodhi v. UOI & Ors.

25 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:7374-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a candidate joining service within an extended period granted by the Court is entitled to seniority from the original appointment date with consequential benefits.

service_law petition_allowed Significant notional seniority extension of joining time interim orders appointment letter

Employees State Insurance Corporation and Anr. v. Dr. Surender Dabas and Ors.

25 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:7283-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction granting minimum pay scale to contractual Medical Officers but allowed petitioners to raise distinctions regarding working hours before the Tribunal for reconsideration.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant contractual employees minimum pay scale Central Administrative Tribunal pay parity

M/S LG ELECTRONICS INDIA (P) LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT)

25 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain

The Delhi High Court allowed customs appeals by holding that DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, restoring appeals to CESTAT for merits adjudication in line with the Supreme Court's ruling in Canon-II.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Directorate of Revenue Intelligence proper officer Section 28 Customs Act, 1962 show cause notice

Archana v. Union of India and Ors.

25 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 1668
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that vacancies not explicitly reserved for women in the NDA recruitment are open to all candidates regardless of gender, directing appointment of a qualified female candidate against unfilled vacancies to uphold constitutional gender neutrality.

administrative petition_allowed Significant gender neutrality reservation Armed Forces recruitment NDA Examination

Pankaj Kumar Sharma & Sangita Sharma v. Rashmi Kumar & State (NCT of Delhi)

25 Aug 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:7484

The Delhi High Court upheld the condonation of delay and restoration of a complaint dismissed in default, emphasizing a liberal approach to delay and the need for merits-based adjudication of mala fide allegations.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant condonation of delay dismissal in default restoration of complaint Section 200 Cr.P.C.

Lux @ Sikander v. State

25 Aug 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:7550

The Delhi High Court upheld conviction under Section 308 IPC for stabbing causing grievous injury but reduced the sentence to the period already served following Supreme Court guidelines on sentence reduction.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 308 IPC Test Identification Parade Grievous injury

Lakhveer Singh v. National Investigation Agency

25 Aug 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Harish Vaidyanathan · 2025:DHC:7313-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's bail plea under UAPA, holding his arrest lawful with prima facie evidence against him, and reaffirmed the requirement to inform arrested persons of grounds of arrest under Article 22.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail under UAPA grounds of arrest Article 22 Constitution prima facie case

Vanlalbiakdika Jh v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

25 Aug 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7282

Bail was denied to the accused carrying cocaine exceeding commercial quantity under NDPS Act, as procedural irregularities and delay claims were held to be trial issues not warranting bail.

criminal bail_denied NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Section 50 NDPS bail application

Furkan @ Faizan v. State (Govt. of NCT, Delhi)

25 Aug 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7276

Bail was denied to the accused in a broad daylight firearm murder case due to the gravity of the offence, pending crucial evidence, and the accused's criminal antecedents.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 302 IPC firearm murder antecedents

Ram Kumar v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.

25 Aug 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7271

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to the accused in a POCSO case, emphasizing the gravity of sexual offences against minors and the need for judicial sensitivity.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail sexual offence POCSO Act Section 354 IPC

Rahul Kumar Pal and Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr

25 Aug 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7303

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following amicable settlement of matrimonial disputes and withdrawal of complaint by the complainant.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC