Delhi High Court
48,936 judgments
State GNCT of Delhi v. Baljeet Singh @ Shankey
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discharge of the accused from Section 12 POCSO offence due to absence of sexual intent in the alleged acts.
Baljeet Singh @ Shanky v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under various IPC sections and POCSO Act after the parties, who are first cousins, amicably settled their dispute to restore family peace.
Natco Pharma Limited v. Bayer Healthcare LLC
The Delhi High Court set aside an interim injunction restraining patent infringement due to lack of satisfaction of legal requirements and remanded the matter for fresh hearing.
Vishal v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Ved Prakash Mishra v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Arms Act against a petitioner who unknowingly carried live cartridges, holding that absence of conscious possession and mens rea justified quashing under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Kunal Berani & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute upon amicable settlement and subject to compensation for the complainant's loss.
Chander Shekhar & Ors. v. The State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, applying inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Shyam Kapoor and Ors. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the municipal authority's Circular directing relocation of unauthorized squatters from Ajmal Khan Road, emphasizing verification of lawful claims by the Town Vending Committee and permitting interim enforcement for pedestrianisation.
Nirmal Singh v. Horizon Crest India Real Estate and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 starts from receipt of the award, rejected the petitioner's attempt to extend limitation via a misconceived Section 33(1) application, and dismissed the petition as barred by limitation.
M/S SNG DEVELOPERSPVT.LTD. v. M/S ASIAPRAGATICAPFINPVT.LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellants to withdraw their appeals against the NCLT order with liberty to approach the court again if needed, dismissing the appeals as withdrawn.
Shristi Communication Network v. Technobile Systems Pvt Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld TDSAT's procedure of deciding claims on affidavit evidence without oral evidence and held that the order directing return of Set Top Boxes was a final, appealable order, dismissing the petition challenging these orders.
M/S. EPCOS ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS S.A v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a revision petition under Section 264 is maintainable against an intimation under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act and allowed the petitioner to revise its return to pay tax at 10% under the DTAA Protocol, directing refund of excess tax paid.
SOCIÉTÉ DES PRODUITS NESTLÉ, S A v. KAIRA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD
The Delhi High Court held that a plaintiff registered proprietor cannot be restrained by interim order from using its trademark on goods beyond those manufactured at the interim order date without a defendant's counterclaim or independent suit asserting prior user rights.
Chanda Tiwari v. Directorate of Social Welfare and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld termination based on bona fide loss of confidence despite delay in raising dispute, holding reinstatement not mandatory and claim barred as stale.
Naresh Kumar Sodhi v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 354, and 506 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and resolved misunderstanding between the parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Shri Raj Kumar Batra v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Sections 498-A/34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Sanjay Kumar & Anr v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Chand Mohammad v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to prevent oppression and futile proceedings.
Priyanka Shukla v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed termination of pregnancy beyond the statutory 20-week limit in a case of severe fetal abnormalities, holding that the MTP Act provisions must be read harmoniously to protect a woman's constitutional rights under Articles 14 and 21.
Shailendra Bahadur v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition after the respondents undertook to provide certified copies of records demanded by the petitioner within two weeks.