Delhi High Court
48,761 judgments
Gulshan Tara & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs under Sections 308, 323, 341, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Gulshan Tara & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs under Sections 308, 323, 341, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Suresh @Chotu & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement and the complainant's consent, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Yogesh & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Virender v. Commissioner of Police
The Delhi High Court upheld disciplinary punishment against a police constable for failing to deposit his service pistol and being intoxicated while carrying it, dismissing his writ petition and refusing to interfere in the departmental proceedings.
Manya Education Private Limited v. Amit Mathur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a suit alleging misuse of confidential information and unfair competition on the basis of the defendants' undertaking to refrain from using such information or soliciting employees.
Mankind Pharma Limited v. Lee Pharmaceuticals of Lee House
The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction restraining a pharmaceutical company from copying another's website content, holding such acts as copyright infringement and passing off.
Gursharan Buggal v. Anil Kumar Dhingra & Ors.
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to refuse impleadment of a third party claiming adverse title in a suit for specific performance, affirming that such impleadment is not a matter of right.
Vindhyachal Mishra @ Dube Ji v. State of NCT Delhi
The High Court refused to quash NDPS Act criminal proceedings at the charge consideration stage, directing the petitioner to raise all contentions before the trial court.
Sh. Naveen Gautam & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC arising from matrimonial discord based on a genuine amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Monu Rajput v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention of a woman found residing with her parents pursuant to a voluntary statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. before a Magistrate outside its jurisdiction.
Aldanish Rein v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition based on hearsay regarding indefinite detention of foreign inmates, directing the petitioner to seek verification through the Legal Services Committee before judicial relief.
Shiv Kumar v. Lt. Governor & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the constitutional validity of Delhi Prison Rules 2018 relating to remission, holding that the rules' definition of "multiple murders" is valid and the petitioner's remission application must be decided under the extant rules.
Daya Meena v. Satish & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that court fees paid on a plaint filed in the wrong court can be adjusted towards the suit filed in the proper court to prevent litigants from paying twice due to counsel's mistake.
Shanti Kaur v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an employee for unauthorized absence without medical proof and rejected a delayed industrial dispute raised after seven years.
Neelam Dubey v. Rani Pandey
The Delhi High Court held that revision under Section 25B(8) of the DRC Act is not maintainable against eviction orders under Section 14(1)(a) for non-payment of rent, dismissing the petition and upholding the eviction.
Xerox Corporation v. P K Khansaheb
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction restraining the Defendants from using the mark ZEROX, holding that cessation of infringing use and withdrawal of oppositions extinguished the cause of action, thereby disposing of the trademark infringement suit.
Shri Gopal Krishan Dua v. Shri Darshan Kumar Dua & Anr.
The court vacated interim injunction over shares transferred by gift deed and maintained status quo only over immoveable properties, holding that delay and prior transfer defeat the plaintiff's prima facie claim.
Hansa Sachdeva v. R.K. Thadhani
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's amendment application to reflect subsequent sale and enhanced damages claims in a property dispute, holding that merits are not to be examined at the amendment stage.
Liyi Marli Noshi & Anr v. Azad Chandra Prakash Gautam & Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition after accepting respondents' unconditional apology and directed Bar Associations to ensure inclusivity and prevent hostility towards the North East community.