Delhi High Court

48,936 judgments

Year:

Sumit Rana v. State

09 Jul 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:3279

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 354A, 354D, and 506 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC settlement between parties inherent jurisdiction

Narendra Kumar Singh v. State & Anr.

09 Jul 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:3280

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the IT Act arising from a matrimonial dispute based on a mediated settlement, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Information Technology Act matrimonial dispute

Deepti Verma v. State

09 Jul 2019 · Manmohan; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2019:DHC:3276-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rape case due to inconsistencies and lack of credible evidence in the prosecutrix's testimony, emphasizing that conviction on sole testimony requires it to inspire confidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony sole testimony Section 376 IPC

Anita Suresh v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Jul 2019 · J.R. Midha · 2019:DHC:3277

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Internal Complaints Committee’s finding that the sexual harassment complaint was false and allowed action against the petitioner for filing a false complaint.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant sexual harassment Internal Complaints Committee false complaint benefit of doubt

Upendra Rai v. Directorate of Enforcement

09 Jul 2019 · Mukta Gupta · 2019:DHC:3278

The Delhi High Court granted bail to Upendra Rai in a PMLA case, holding that the twin conditions for bail under Section 45(1) PMLA are unconstitutional post the 2018 amendment and bail must be considered on merits without applying those conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 45 PMLA bail money laundering

Nav Durga Adarsh Vidhalaya v. Directorate of Education

09 Jul 2019 · Anu Malhotra · 2019:DHC:3274

The Delhi High Court upheld the withdrawal of recognition of a school for enrolling students physically attending another school and issuing them certificates but held that the withdrawal must be effective from the succeeding academic year, not immediately.

administrative other Significant withdrawal of recognition Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 enrolment irregularities passing certificates

Saroj Saini & Anr v. Dharam Pal & Ors

09 Jul 2019 · Najmi Waziri · (2009) 6 SCC 121

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to increase the compensation multiplier from 11 to 17 and awarded 40% of total compensation for loss of future prospects in a motor accident claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant multiplier loss of future prospects motor accident claim compensation

Pawan Gupta & Anr. v. Kamal Gupta & Ors.

09 Jul 2019 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:8796

The Delhi High Court upheld the reference of family business disputes to arbitration between signatories to Family Settlement Deeds while excluding non-signatories' properties and shares, dismissing intervention applications by non-signatories.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Family Settlement Deed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Non-signatory Arbitrability

Vishal Ahmad v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Jul 2019 · Vipin Sanghi; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2019:DHC:3250-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination of a CRPF probationer for failing training exams, holding that termination under Rule 5 of the Central Civil Service (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965 was valid despite alleged parity claims and salary payment issues.

administrative petition_dismissed probationer termination Central Civil Service (Temporary Service) Rules 1965 training examination failure CRPF Establishment Manual

Bharat Bhushan Sharma v. Allahabad Bank

08 Jul 2019 · Vipin Sanghi; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2019:DHC:3253-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the secured creditor's right under the SARFAESI Act to cancel an auction sale and accept a higher offer from the borrower, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to the cancellation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 13(8) Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules auction cancellation

Mandeep Singh & Anr. v. State

08 Jul 2019 · Mukta Gupta · 2019:DHC:3262

The Delhi High Court held that a Head Constable is competent to conduct raids and investigations under the Delhi Excise Act, 2009, and dismissed the petition challenging the charge framed on this ground.

criminal petition_dismissed Delhi Excise Act, 2009 Head Constable Excise Officer powers Delhi Excise Rules, 2010

Ramesh Chander Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

08 Jul 2019 · Vipin Sanghi; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2019:DHC:3252-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of daily-wage workers' claim for regularization but directed preference for their re-engagement over others, emphasizing that creation of permanent posts is a policy matter beyond judicial interference.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant daily-wage workers regularization sanctioned posts replacement of daily wagers

Yash Raj Films Pvt Ltd v. Sri Sai Ganesh Prodsuctions & Ors.

08 Jul 2019 · Manmohan · 2019:DHC:3244

Delhi High Court held that the defendants infringed the plaintiff's copyright in the film 'Band Baaja Baaraat' by substantially copying it in 'Jabardasth' and granted permanent injunction restraining release of the infringing film.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant copyright infringement cinematograph film permanent injunction territorial jurisdiction

Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Bright Lifecare Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

08 Jul 2019 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2019:DHC:3243

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining an e-commerce platform and sellers from unauthorized sale and advertisement of Amway products without consent, mandating removal of unauthorized listings and disclosure of authorized sellers.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction e-commerce platform liability unauthorized sale product listing consent

Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Flipkart Internet Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

08 Jul 2019 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2019:DHC:3242

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining Flipkart and certain sellers from listing and selling Amway products without consent, mandating removal of unauthorized listings and disclosure of authorized sellers' details.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction e-commerce platform unauthorized sale product listing

Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Pioneering Products and Ors.

08 Jul 2019 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2019:DHC:3241

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining unauthorized sale and advertisement of Amway products on Amazon and other e-commerce platforms, mandating seller consent and transparency during the pendency of the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction e-commerce unauthorized sale product listing

V C ..... v. A C .....

08 Jul 2019 · G.S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:3237-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's grant of divorce on grounds of mental cruelty, including threats of suicide and matrimonial profiles indicating breakdown of marriage.

family appeal_dismissed Significant mental cruelty Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(1)(ia) suicide note matrimonial profiles

S G v. R K G

08 Jul 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:3236-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a Family Court divorce decree, holding that unproven allegations of cruelty and irretrievable breakdown alone do not justify divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_allowed Significant cruelty divorce Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia)

ICICI Bank Limited v. Ishita Travels Pvt Ltd & Anr

08 Jul 2019 · Prateek Jalan · 2019:DHC:7982
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court allowed ICICI Bank's petition and appointed receivers over hypothecated vehicles, emphasizing a pragmatic approach to protect financial institutions' interests under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant appointment of receiver hypothecated vehicles Order 40 Rule 1 CPC financial institutions

Anil Kumar Bajpai v. The Speaker, Legislative Assembly and Ami

08 Jul 2019 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2019:DHC:7532

The Delhi High Court held that the Speaker need not decide preliminary objections of bias before proceeding with anti-defection proceedings and dismissed petitions challenging his jurisdiction.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Speaker jurisdiction anti-defection proceedings bias objection Delhi Legislative Assembly