Delhi High Court

48,761 judgments

Year:

Ramesh Sanka v. Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

15 Jul 2019 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2019:DHC:7543

The Delhi High Court directed ICAI's Director (Discipline) to examine the petitioner's complaints of professional misconduct within three months, emphasizing procedural compliance without opining on merits.

administrative petition_allowed Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 Section 21 Director (Discipline) professional misconduct

Bharat Electronics Ltd v. Bishan Swaroop Sharma

15 Jul 2019 · J. R. Midha · 2019:DHC:7483

The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of a workman by Bharat Electronics Limited following a fair inquiry, confirmed compensation awarded by the Labour Court, but reduced the interest rate from 12% to the bank rate.

labor appeal_dismissed termination of employment fair inquiry misconduct compensation

Ramveer v. State

15 Jul 2019 · A.K. Chawla, J. · 2019:DHC:3344

The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC to voluntarily causing hurt under Section 324 IPC and released him on probation, holding that the prosecution failed to prove intention to murder and grievous injuries beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 324 IPC Attempt to murder Grievous hurt

Arti Rani v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation

15 Jul 2019 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2019:DHC:3345

The Delhi High Court upheld the municipal authority's rejection of a license extension and restoration of possession due to eviction and non-payment of dues, affirming adherence to policy and administrative discretion.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant license extension municipal property eviction public premises act

Union of India v. Vinod Kumar Sharma

15 Jul 2019 · G.S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:3356-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of contractual staff nurses to salary and allowances equivalent to regular employees at minimum pay scale, dismissing the Union of India's writ petition challenging the CAT order.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant contractual staff nurses pay parity allowances increments

M/S DECCAN CHARTERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. VIKRAM THAPA

15 Jul 2019 · J.R. Midha · 2019:DHC:3355

The Delhi High Court held that termination on bona fide loss of confidence does not require a domestic inquiry and reinstatement is not warranted even if the inquiry is flawed; only compensation is appropriate.

labor other Significant loss of confidence domestic inquiry principles of natural justice termination without inquiry

N C DECORS PVT LTD v. ONGC

15 Jul 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:3364-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of the petitioner's bid for non-submission of MSME certificate with the bid, holding that strict compliance with tender conditions is mandatory for availing purchase preference.

administrative petition_dismissed MSME certificate purchase preference tender conditions service contract

Anu Rani v. Vishwantra Dhama

15 Jul 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:3350

The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to promptly decide the petitioner's interim maintenance application, emphasizing that undue delay defeats the purpose of providing timely financial support.

family petition_allowed Significant interim maintenance Domestic Violence Act trial court prompt disposal

Dr Yamsani Srinivas v. Union of India & Anr

15 Jul 2019 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2019:DHC:3349

The Delhi High Court upheld MCI's revocation of registration of the petitioner's MRCEM qualification as it was not recognized for registration in the UK specialty, but allowed the petitioner to reapply with sufficient proof.

administrative petition_dismissed Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 Section 13 Section 26 additional qualification

Saurabh Jain v. State (NCT of Delhi)

15 Jul 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:3348

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a cheating and forgery case based on a bona fide settlement and partial forensic support, subject to bail conditions and adherence to the settlement.

criminal appeal_allowed regular bail settlement agreement cheating forgery

Divyansh Tyagi v. Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology

15 Jul 2019 · Anu Malhotra · 2019:DHC:3347

Delhi High Court upheld IIIT Delhi's policy of awarding bonus points to candidates for admissions, dismissing petitions challenging the merit list as a reasonable academic decision not warranting judicial interference.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant bonus points JEE Main 2019 percentile score merit list

Shivani v. Employee State Insurance Corporation

15 Jul 2019 · C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:3346

The Delhi High Court held that an insured person’s ward cannot be denied admission under the ESIC IP quota due to employer’s delayed filing of contribution returns, directing issuance of the Ward of Insured Person certificate and admission accordingly.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 Ward of Insured Person certificate Delayed filing of returns Employer default

Sanjay Kapur v. Vikram Kapur

15 Jul 2019 · Navin Chawla · 2019:DHC:3363

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act due to lack of intent to arbitrate and prior concession on property division.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 Section 34 Interim relief

Aman Vyas v. Union of India

15 Jul 2019 · Mukta Gupta · 2019:DHC:3352

The Delhi High Court upheld the extradition of Aman Vyas to the UK, holding that a prima facie case based on credible evidence suffices for extradition even without formal charges.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant extradition suspect vs accused prima facie case DNA evidence

Aman Vyas v. Union of India

15 Jul 2019 · Mukta Gupta · 2019:DHC:3354

The Delhi High Court upheld the extradition of Aman Vyas to the UK, holding that a prima facie case exists against him and that the term 'accused' under the Extradition Act includes persons reasonably suspected of offences even without formal charges.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant extradition prima facie case suspect vs accused Extradition Act 1962

Aas Mohammad v. Sabiha Akhtar

15 Jul 2019 · Anu Malhotra · 2019:DHC:3353

The court upheld the validity of a registered sale deed and tenancy agreement, dismissing the appeal and granting possession and recovery of arrears to the plaintiff.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant registered sale deed possession landlord-tenant relationship tenancy agreement

Rishika Puri v. Nirmal Puri & Anr

15 Jul 2019 · Rekha Palli · 2019:DHC:3351

The Delhi High Court partly allowed the appeal by modifying the possession decree to permit the appellant to vacate the property in favor of an amicable settlement providing alternative accommodation and financial arrangements.

civil appeal_allowed possession suit Order XII Rule 6 CPC licensee amicable settlement

Directorate of Education & Anr v. Ankur & Anr

15 Jul 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:3367-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the reinstatement of a peon appointed without full compliance to recruitment procedures, emphasizing long service and approval by the Directorate of Education.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant aided school recruitment appointment irregularity Directorate of Education circular 20 days notice

Joginder Kumar @ Jonny v. The State & Ors. (NCT of Delhi)

15 Jul 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:3362

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 452, and 354-A IPC on settlement of dispute between parties, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC inherent jurisdiction settlement of dispute

Tata Sons Ltd. v. Mr. Prakash Yadav & Ors.

15 Jul 2019 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2019:DHC:3365

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages against defendants for trademark infringement of 'TATA' marks and held the proprietor guilty of contempt for false statements and obstruction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction contempt of court