Delhi High Court

48,408 judgments

Year:

M/S DATAR SECURITY SERVICES GROUP v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

19 Jul 2019 · G.S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:3505-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the arbitrary decision to retender security service contracts after completion of e-tendering, holding that the lowest responsive bidders were entitled to the award, emphasizing limited judicial review in procurement matters.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant judicial review tender process e-tendering GeM portal

M/S DATAR SECURITY SERVICES GROUP v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

19 Jul 2019 · G.S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:3506-DB

Delhi High Court quashed arbitrary re-tendering after completed E-tender process, directing award to lowest bidders as per original tender, emphasizing limited judicial review in administrative tender decisions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant E-tendering Government e-Marketplace (GeM) portal Judicial review Tender cancellation

M/S Datar Security Services Group v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

19 Jul 2019 · G.S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:3504-DB

Delhi High Court quashed arbitrary re-tendering after completed E-tender process, directing award of contract to lowest bidders in absence of valid reasons.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant E-tendering Government e-Marketplace (GeM) portal Judicial review Administrative action

M/S DATAR SECURITY SERVICES GROUP v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

19 Jul 2019 · G.S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:3507-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the arbitrary cancellation of completed E-tenders and held that lowest responsive bidders must be awarded contracts unless valid reasons justify re-tendering.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant judicial review public procurement E-tendering GeM portal

Pradeep Singh Gosain v. State & Anr.

19 Jul 2019 · R.K. Gauba · 2019:DHC:3500

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on a bona fide settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence Section 498A IPC

National Insurance Co Ltd v. Meenakshi Gupta & Ors.

19 Jul 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:3496

The Delhi High Court upheld compensation for death caused by accident injuries despite absence of post-mortem report, relying on medical evidence and credible testimony establishing causation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant compensation motor accident post-mortem report causation

Principal Commissioner, Central Tax South v. M/S JC Decaux Advertisment India Pvt. Ltd.

19 Jul 2019 · D.N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2018 (13) GSTL 30

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Department's appeal, affirming the allowability of CENVAT credit on capital goods used in Bus-Q-Shelter construction for 2011-2012, consistent with prior rulings.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant CENVAT credit Bus-Q-Shelter capital goods CESTAT

Dayalbagh Educational Institute v. University Grants Commission & Ors.

19 Jul 2019 · Anu Malhotra · 2019:DHC:3495

The Delhi High Court upheld UGC's withdrawal of recognition for a deemed university's MBA program in ODL mode due to lack of AICTE approval, affirming the mandatory statutory regulatory compliance under UGC (ODL) Regulations, 2017.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant University Grants Commission Open and Distance Learning Deemed University AICTE approval

SHRI RAM GEN INS CO LTD. v. ARVIND KUMAR & ORS.

19 Jul 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:3498
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's award of compensation based on one year's authentic ITR and recognized loss of future prospects in permanent disability cases, dismissing the insurer's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Return loss of income functional disability loss of future prospects

Jamna Dass v. Akash Drall

19 Jul 2019 · Prateek Jalan · 2019:DHC:3479

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to allow amendment of the written statement after trial commencement, emphasizing due diligence and the impermissibility of retracting admissions in pleadings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of pleadings due diligence admission in pleadings

Ritika Juneja & Ors. v. Anshuman Narang

19 Jul 2019 · Prateek Jalan, J. · 2019:DHC:3481

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order rejecting the defendants' application to dismiss a defamation and harassment suit at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action.

civil petition_dismissed Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action defamation harassment

Thermax Limited v. Thermax Engineers Pvt Ltd

19 Jul 2019 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2019:DHC:3482

The Delhi High Court held that registration of a corporate name by the ROC does not authorize its use if it infringes a prior well-known trademark, granting permanent injunction to Thermax Limited against Thermax Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Corporate name Registrar of Companies

Mehar Singh Loh v. Airport Authority of India

19 Jul 2019 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2019:DHC:3497

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application to recall the withdrawal order and restore the suit, holding that the remedy lay exclusively before the Original Side of the Court and that settled jurisdictional findings cannot be reopened after long delay.

civil petition_dismissed Significant withdrawal of suit restoration of suit inherent powers Section 151 CPC jurisdiction

State v. H.C. Sanjiv Malik

19 Jul 2019 · R.K. Gauba · 2019:DHC:3502

The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges against the accused for forgery and criminal conspiracy, emphasizing the binding nature of counsel's concession as an officer of the court and the proper scope of judicial scrutiny at the charge stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant charge framing section 482 CrPC forgery arms license

Sohan Lal & Ors. v. The State of Delhi

19 Jul 2019 · R.K. Gauba · 2019:DHC:3503

The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants in a dowry death case due to unreliable prosecution evidence and unexplained delay in FIR, emphasizing the need for credible proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC reliability of sole eyewitness

Sohan Lal & Ors. v. The State of Delhi

19 Jul 2019 · R.K. Gauba · 2019:DHC:3501

The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants in a dowry death case due to wholly unreliable eyewitness testimony and failure of prosecution to prove cruelty and forcible poisoning beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC forcible administration of poison

Union of India v. M/S MKU PVT. LTD.

19 Jul 2019 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2019:DHC:3499

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing release of withheld liquidated damages where the delay was regularized by the petitioner without reserving the right to levy damages and no loss was proved.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition liquidated damages contract extension

Gaurav Garg v. Aly Morani & Ors.

19 Jul 2019 · G.S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:3477-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against closure of plaintiff's evidence due to repeated adjournments and dilatory conduct, upholding the trial court's order to prevent abuse of judicial process.

civil appeal_dismissed closure of evidence adjournments Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section 65B Indian Evidence Act

Ambedkar University of Delhi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

19 Jul 2019 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2019:DHC:3480

The Delhi High Court held that the Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities lacks power to issue binding directions on reservation of posts, setting aside the impugned order while affirming the Commissioner's role to refer matters to appropriate authorities.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act 1995 reservation in employment powers of Commissioner limitations on statutory authorities

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. ANJALI BOUTER SINGH & ORS

19 Jul 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:3478

The Delhi High Court upheld the MACT's jurisdiction to entertain a motor accident claim petition filed through a duly authorized attorney at the insurer's office location, rejecting hyper-technical jurisdictional objections.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Accident Claims Tribunal jurisdiction Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166(1)(d)