Principal Commissioner, Central Tax South v. M/S JC Decaux Advertisment India Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi High Court · 19 Jul 2019 · 2019:DHC:3508-DB
D.N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar
SERTA 11/2019
2018 (13) GSTL 30
tax appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Department's appeal, affirming the allowability of CENVAT credit on capital goods used in Bus-Q-Shelter construction for 2011-2012, consistent with prior rulings.

Full Text
Translation output
SERTA 11/2019
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 19.07.2019
SERTA 11/2019
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL TAX SOUTH..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Sameer Jain, Standing Counsel
VERSUS
M/S JC DECAUX ADVERTISMENT INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta & Mr. Balkrishan Sharma, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
JUDGMENT
D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL)
CM APPL.15866/2019
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CM APPL.15865/2019
This is an application filed by the appellant seeking condonation of
270 days delay in filing the present appeal.
For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 270 days in filing the present appeal is condoned.
Application stands disposed of.

1. This appeal has been preferred challenging the order passed by 2019:DHC:3508-DB CESTAT dated 17.04.2018 whereby the order in original passed by the Commissioner dated 17.07.2014 has been quashed and set aside.

2. The issue involved in this appeal was that the respondent had wrongly availed and utilized the CENVAT credit on capital goods and inputs used in the construction of Bus-Q-Shelter, steel structures/aluminium panels, steel framework, police booth, electrical equipment for panoramic/free standing panel etc. amounting to Rs.6,85,79,559/-.

3. As the CESTAT has quashed and set aside the order in original, the Department has preferred the present appeal in the year 2011-2012 for Rs.72,71,717/-. Counsels appearing for both the sides jointly submitted that in SERTA 04/2019, the Division Bench of this court has already passed an order dated 01.04.2019, whereby the appeal preferred by the Department has been dismissed and the CENVAT credit was allowed to be availed by the assessee for the year 2006-2007 to 2010-2011.

4. The present appeal is for the year 2011-2012. There is no change in the facts of the case in hand and the case already decided by this Court as stated above which is reported in 2018 (13) GSTL 30 for the same reasons.

5. In view of the above, as there is no substantial question of law we dismiss this appeal preferred by the Department.

CHIEF JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR, J JULY 19, 2019