Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Alok Gupta & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the construction of a wall adjacent to shops, holding that the road width and access gates were sufficient and no interference was warranted.
Ayesha @ Asha & Ors. v. Hirawati
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretionary order allowing the plaintiff to pay deficient court fees under Section 149 CPC, dismissing the defendants' plea to reject the plaint for insufficient court fees.
Chuckles Kohli & Ors. v. Ravinder Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld injunction enforcement orders and dismissed appellants' challenge to directions requiring their personal appearance for alleged breach of status quo by consenting to lease of disputed property.
Tomorrowland Technologies Exports Limited v. Mercantile Ventures Ltd.
An ex-parte arbitration award passed without leave of the court during winding up proceedings is unenforceable and a nullity under Section 446(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
M/S Naveen Vidya Bharti Public Higher Secondary School v. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Bhopal
The Delhi High Court upheld that persons employed through contractors and those drawing wages, including the Chairman, qualify as employees under the EPF Act, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to provident fund liability from April 2008.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4 v. Indian Sugar Exim Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld that the limitation period for penalty proceedings under the Income Tax Act begins when any Commissioner of Income Tax receives the ITAT order, rendering penalty orders beyond this period invalid.
Amit v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of attempted murder and arms offences, subject to furnishing bail bonds and conditions ensuring trial integrity and attendance.
Gaurav Aggarwal v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside a conviction based on an unauthorized plea of guilty entered by counsel during ongoing trial, emphasizing strict adherence to criminal procedure and directing retrial.
Ramwati v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court confirmed the petitioner’s conviction under Sections 356/34 and 379/34 IPC but granted release on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act considering her reformation and family circumstances.
Corsan Corviam Construccion S.A.- Sadhbhav Engineering Ltd. JV v. Commissioner of Trade & Taxes
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed VAT refund is payable from two months after filing the refund claim until actual receipt of the refund amount, rejecting the respondent's contention that the limitation period starts from the next working day.
Sarla Gupta & Anr. v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court held that under PMLA proceedings, at the pre-charge stage, the accused is entitled only to documents relied upon by the prosecution, and provisions of Sections 207 and 208 CrPC do not apply mutatis mutandis.
Sarla Gupta & Anr. v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court held that under PMLA proceedings, accused are entitled only to documents relied upon by prosecution at pre-charge stage, dismissing petitions seeking all investigation documents.
M/S BLUE BIRD PURE PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court allowed a petitioner to rectify an inadvertent error in the GST TRAN-1 Form post-deadline, directing authorities to accept corrections and waive penalties to enable lawful input tax credit claims.
Shashank Bhagat & Anr. v. Shefali Varma & Ors.
The court held that the arbitration agreement is binding only between the petitioners and Ms Shefali Varma, not the respondent Companies, due to lack of authorization and inapplicability of the doctrine of indoor management, and appointed an arbitrator accordingly.
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. M/s Meroform India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT order dismissing Revenue's appeals, holding that reopening assessments under Section 153A without incriminating material is unjustified and that additions based on uncorroborated statements were rightly deleted.
HAWKERS JOINT ACTION COMMITTEE v. NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court declined to continue monitoring the implementation of the Street Vendors Act, 2014, emphasizing that statutory bodies are in place and that reliefs against illegal removals require specific evidence.
Management of M/s Ikon Residency v. Naveen Chand Joshi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions filed by respondents against M/s Ikon Residency management on the basis of an amicable settlement duly recorded and complied with by the parties.
Kohli One Housing & Development Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Rockman Projects Ltd.
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expedite and conclude within six months the delayed trial proceedings relating to dishonour of cheques following jurisdictional transfer under the 2015 Ordinance.
Irshad & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 354, 509, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and resolved misunderstanding between related parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Rohit Sharma v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, applying inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC as per Supreme Court precedent.