Delhi High Court

48,408 judgments

Year:

Gurdeep Singh & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

21 Aug 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:4092

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement and the complainant's affidavit, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498-A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC Section 482 CrPC

Mohsina v. Bajaj Alliance Gen Ins Co Ltd & Anr.

21 Aug 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:4107

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 147(1)(b)(i) of the Motor Vehicles Act, the insurer must first pay compensation to claimants and then recover it from the vehicle owner, even if the deceased was a gratuitous passenger.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 147(1)(b)(i) pay and recover insurance liability

Cholamandalam MS Gen Insurance Co Ltd v. Sarika & Ors.

21 Aug 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:4106

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal challenging compensation calculated on a fresh minimum wage notification, upholding the award based on the latest valid wage rate.

civil appeal_dismissed minimum wage compensation award Government of NCT of Delhi notification

Om Pal Singh v. L.I.C. of India & Ors.

21 Aug 2019 · J. R. Midha · 2019:DHC:4108

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition to award reasonable compensation to a contractual employee terminated after prolonged service, denying reinstatement and back wages.

labor petition_allowed Significant regularization industrial dispute termination compensation

Fakrudddin & Others v. Mohd Nabi & Anr

21 Aug 2019 · Yogesh Khanna · 2019:DHC:4090

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding the respondent's ownership and possession rights over the disputed terrace, rejecting the appellants' res judicata and tenancy claims.

civil appeal_dismissed res judicata possession ownership sub-tenancy

Katyan Shikshan Samiti v. Union of India & Ors.

21 Aug 2019 · Anu Malhotra · 2019:DHC:4089

The Delhi High Court upheld the refusal to grant permission to start a new Ayurveda college due to non-compliance with mandatory standards by the prescribed date, emphasizing the supervisory role of the Central Government and the necessity of reasoned administrative orders.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Indian Medicine Central Council Act 1970 Section 13A Ayurveda college permission Minimum Requirements of Standards 2016

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-21 v. Lalit Bagai

21 Aug 2019 · S. Muralidhar; Talwant Singh · 2019:DHC:4086-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that reassessment under Section 147 cannot be based on a mere change of opinion or audit objections without the Assessing Officer's independent satisfaction, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant reassessment Section 147 Income Tax Act change of opinion Assessing Officer satisfaction

Malkhan Singh & Ors. v. Savitri Devi & Ors.

21 Aug 2019 · I. S. Mehta · 2019:DHC:4088
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld mutation of agricultural land in favor of daughters based on family settlement and possession, dismissing petitioners' claim as reversioners under the Delhi Land Reforms Act.

property petition_dismissed Significant mutation bhumidari rights Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 Hindu Succession Act

Prof. Sabiha Hussain v. Jamia Millia Islamia

21 Aug 2019 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2021:DHC:2523

The Delhi High Court held that tenure-based faculty appointed under UGC Plan schemes are not entitled to automatic regularisation upon merger of posts into the University’s Regular Establishment, and posts must be filled through open selection in compliance with constitutional equality mandates.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant regularisation tenure appointment UGC Plan posts merger of posts

Union of India v. Ashok Kumar Saroha

20 Aug 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:7921-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed as withdrawn writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging an interim order after a final order was passed, allowing related exemption applications.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition interim order final order withdrawal of petition

Gunjan Mehta v. Union of India and Ors.

20 Aug 2019 · S. Muralidhar; Talwant Singh · 2019:DHC:7920-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging land acquisition awards after a 20-year delay, holding that stale claims without satisfactory explanation are barred by laches and cannot be entertained under the 2013 Act.

property petition_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 laches delay

Roshan Lal Tikoo v. Commissioner of Police & Anr

20 Aug 2019 · Chief Justice D.N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:4078-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Commissioner of Police to decide the appellant's show cause notice in accordance with law and maintain status quo until such decision, dismissing the appeal with these directions.

administrative appeal_dismissed eviction notice show cause notice administrative law opportunity of hearing

MAGNUM INTERNATIONAL TRADING COMPANY PVT LTD v. VIKAS DHAWAN & ORS

20 Aug 2019 · CHIEF JUSTICE D.N. PATEL; C.HARI SHANKAR · 2019:DHC:4077-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal against refusal of stay of NCDRC proceedings, holding that jurisdictional and procedural issues must be raised in the pending writ petition or before the NCDRC itself.

civil appeal_dismissed NCDRC jurisdiction Consumer Protection Act stay of proceedings Letters Patent Appeal

Mukesh Thakur v. Chairman Cum Managing Director, Engineering Projects India Ltd. & Ors.

20 Aug 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:4070

The Delhi High Court upheld the reversion of an employee on probation to his previous post due to unsatisfactory performance, holding that statutory PSU rules prevail over administrative guidelines and that the employer acted within its powers.

administrative petition_dismissed probation reversion public sector enterprise natural justice

Suneel Tyagi v. Union of India and Ors.

20 Aug 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:4069

The Delhi High Court held that a disabled ex-serviceman cannot combine separate age relaxation provisions beyond the capped limit prescribed for disabled defence personnel and dismissed his petition challenging rejection on age grounds.

administrative petition_dismissed age relaxation ex-servicemen persons with disabilities disabled defence personnel

Tushar Ranjan Mohanty v. Union of India

20 Aug 2019 · Vipin Sanghi; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2019:DHC:4071-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the suspension of a government servant for disobeying superior’s orders, affirming the discretionary power of authorities to suspend in public interest under CCS (CCA) Rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant suspension discretionary power CCS (CCA) Rules public interest

Anguri Sagar v. M/S NBCC Ltd & Ors.

20 Aug 2019 · Yogesh Khanna · 2019:DHC:4054

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant failed to prove any right or title over the disputed property or the existence of an ancient temple, and thus was not entitled to permanent injunction against demolition.

civil appeal_dismissed permanent injunction burden of proof ancient temple possession

Amit Passi v. K K Passi & Ors.

20 Aug 2019 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2019:DHC:4055

The Delhi High Court allowed conditional release of 25% of sale proceeds from partitioned family properties pending probate proceedings, balancing competing claims with security measures.

civil other Significant partition decree sale proceeds testamentary case probate

SMT Pataso Devi v. SH Satish Kumar & Ors.

20 Aug 2019 · Jayant Nath, J. · 2019:DHC:4075

The Delhi High Court held that a suit for partition of built-up land is not barred by the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, and dismissed defendants' applications for rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Order 7 Rule 11 CPC partition suit

Vedanta Ltd. v. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-26 (1), New Delhi

20 Aug 2019 · S. Muralidhar; Talwant Singh · 2019:DHC:4056-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that reopening of income tax assessment after four years is invalid where the assessee has made full disclosure of material facts, including payments and explanations for non-deduction of TDS.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 147 Reopening of assessment Full and true disclosure