Delhi High Court

47,108 judgments

Year:

Rajan Kumar Anand & Anr. v. State & Anr.

20 Aug 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:4062
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 384, 406, 506, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings in a dispute with predominant civil elements would be oppressive and the possibility of conviction remote.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 Cr.P.C. mediated settlement commercial dispute

Ram Kishan v. State, Govt. of NCT of Delhi

20 Aug 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:4058

The Delhi High Court suspended the appellant’s sentence during appeal due to a valid challenge on prosecution sanction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, emphasizing the necessity of competent authority sanction for conviction.

criminal sentence_modified Significant prosecution sanction Prevention of Corruption Act Section 120B IPC Section 409 IPC

Ratul Puri v. Directorate Enforcement of India, Delhi Zonal Office, New Delhi

20 Aug 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:4059

Pre-arrest bail was denied to the petitioner in a PMLA money laundering case due to the gravity of offence and necessity of custodial interrogation for effective investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Pre-arrest bail Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Section 50 PMLA statement Custodial interrogation

HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. v. NAINA BHATIA & ORS.

20 Aug 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:4079

The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded for a fatal road accident, affirming the credibility of the eyewitness and rejecting contributory negligence claims against the deceased motorcycle rider.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant eyewitness testimony motor accident claim rash and negligent driving contributory negligence

Manisha Priyadarshini v. Sri Aurobindo College – Evening & Ors.

20 Aug 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:4061

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking reinstatement after expiry of an ad-hoc contract, holding no right to resume duties without contract extension.

labor petition_dismissed ad-hoc employment contract expiry reinstatement maternity leave

Sh. Girish Chand and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

20 Aug 2019 · Vipin Sanghi; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2019:DHC:4068-DB

The Delhi High Court held that purchasing LTC tickets through unauthorized agents does not constitute misconduct warranting disciplinary action and granted interim relief against recovery of LTC advance pending adjudication.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Leave Travel Concession LTC Rules unauthorized travel agent misconduct

M/S SAI MOTORS & ANR v. ADITYA JAIN & ORS

20 Aug 2019 · Rekha Palli · 2019:DHC:4052

The Delhi High Court upheld a decree for possession in favor of lessors against lessees who admitted tenancy but disputed title based on an unsettled family settlement, holding that tenancy admission estops title challenge and supports summary possession decree.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant lease deed possession Order XII Rule 6 CPC Section 116 Indian Evidence Act

Gunjan Sharma v. Commissioner of Customs (Preventive)

20 Aug 2019 · Manmohan J; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal J · 2019:DHC:4053-DB

The Delhi High Court reduced the penalty on a Customs House Agent for failure to verify importer credentials, affirming that due diligence is required but liability arises only upon admitted lapses or complicity.

customs appeal_allowed Significant Customs House Agent Penalty under Customs Act Due diligence Section 114AA Customs Act

GE ENERGY PARTS INC ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sachit Jolly & Mr. Aarush Bhatia, Advocates v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX & ANR. .....

20 Aug 2019 · JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH O R D E R; 20.08... · 2019:DHC:4063-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that penalty orders under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act passed beyond the six-month limitation period from receipt of the ITAT order by any Commissioner, including CIT (Judicial), are invalid and set aside the impugned penalty orders accordingly.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 271(1)(c) Section 275(1)(a) limitation period

IMPROVE VYAPAAR PVT. LTD v. VVA DEVELOPERS (P) LTD & ORS

20 Aug 2019 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2019:DHC:4067

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award declining compensation and awarding interest, holding that erroneous contract interpretation by an arbitrator is not a ground for setting aside the award absent patent illegality.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition patent illegality arbitral award

Kiran Kapoor v. The State & Ors

20 Aug 2019 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2019:DHC:4066

The Delhi High Court granted probate of a valid Will under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in favor of the petitioner wife, with no objections from other legal heirs.

civil petition_allowed probate Indian Succession Act, 1925 Will Section 276

Sanjay Gupta v. Election Commission of India & Ors.

20 Aug 2019 · Jayant Nath · 2019:DHC:4065

The Delhi High Court held that the Election Commission and Returning Officer are not necessary parties to an election petition under Section 82 of the Representation of People Act, 1951, and must be deleted from the array of parties.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Representation of People Act, 1951 Section 82 Election petition Necessary parties

Telecommunication Consultant India Ltd & Anr. v. Anil Bhasin & Anr.

20 Aug 2019 · Prateek Jalan · 2019:DHC:4064

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's refusal to allow amendment of the written statement after trial commencement due to lack of due diligence under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of pleadings due diligence Article 227 Constitution of India

Rajeev Agarwal v. Union of India and Ors.

20 Aug 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:4047

The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary proceedings against a senior officer of Petronet LNG Limited without Board approval and in violation of natural justice are illegal, affirming the company's status as State under Article 12 and quashing the inquiry report and charge-sheet.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 12 Constitution of India Companies Act 2013 disciplinary proceedings charge-sheet approval

P. Chidambaram v. Central Bureau of Investigation

20 Aug 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:4060

The Delhi High Court denied pre-arrest bail to former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram in a high-profile money laundering and corruption case, emphasizing the gravity of economic offences and necessity of custodial interrogation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant pre-arrest bail money laundering Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

Vijay @ Balkhan v. State of Delhi

20 Aug 2019 · R. K. Gauba · 2019:DHC:4073

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for attempt to murder but reduced the sentence considering the long lapse of time and clean antecedents.

criminal sentence_modified Section 307 IPC Attempt to murder Common intention Credible victim testimony

Bharat Bhushan & Ors. v. State & Anr.

20 Aug 2019 · R.K. Gauba · 2019:DHC:4074

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC arising from matrimonial dispute based on a bona fide settlement, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Triloki Nath Chaudhary v. Hari Overseas (P) Ltd

20 Aug 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:4076-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that an employee performing managerial and administrative duties does not qualify as a 'workman' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant workman Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2(s) managerial duties

Shekhar Garg v. The State

20 Aug 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:4049

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of rape and criminal intimidation, emphasizing the disputed facts and delay in FIR while imposing protective conditions.

criminal bail_granted bail Section 376 IPC Section 506 IPC consent

P. Chidambaram v. Central Bureau of Investigation

20 Aug 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:4051

The Delhi High Court denied pre-arrest bail to P. Chidambaram in high-profile money laundering and corruption cases, emphasizing the gravity of economic offences and necessity of custodial interrogation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant pre-arrest bail money laundering Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988