Delhi High Court

46,774 judgments

Year:

Hari Ram Nagar & Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

22 Aug 2019 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2019:DHC:4120

The Delhi High Court held that suits involving infrastructure projects under Section 20A of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, are not maintainable for injunctions to stall such projects, even if the plaintiff lacks a contractual relationship with the defendant.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Specific Relief Act 1963 Section 20A infrastructure project injunction

New Delhi Municipal Council v. Subh Narayan Sah

22 Aug 2019 · C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:4115

The Delhi High Court held that the respondent was illegally retrenched after continuous service exceeding 240 days but modified reinstatement relief to lump-sum compensation, emphasizing the workman's burden to prove continuous service and the discretionary nature of reinstatement for daily wage workers.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 continuous service 240 days rule illegal retrenchment

M/s. S. Gurcharan Singh & Sons v. Commissioner Trade & Taxes

22 Aug 2019 · S. Muralidhar; Talwant Singh · 2019:DHC:4124-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner's tax objections are deemed allowed due to Respondents' failure to decide within statutory time, set aside invalid default assessments, and directed refund with interest.

tax petition_allowed Significant Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 Section 74 objections deemed allowed objections Input Tax Credit denial

Saurabh v. State of NCT of Delhi

22 Aug 2019 · R.K. Gauba · 2019:DHC:4117

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of two appellants for gang rape of a mentally disabled woman, affirming reliance on credible victim testimony despite absence of medical corroboration and emphasizing the evidentiary value of accused's statements under Section 313 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sexual assault intellectual disability prosecutrix testimony Section 313 CrPC

Saurabh v. State of NCT of Delhi

22 Aug 2019 · R.K. Gauba · 2019:DHC:4114

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of two appellants for rape and related offences based on credible testimony of a prosecutrix with moderate intellectual disability, rejecting arguments based on absence of forensic evidence and delay in reporting.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant intellectual disability rape sexual assault section 313 CrPC

Nimish H. Shah and Anr. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India and Anr.

22 Aug 2019 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2019:DHC:4113

The Delhi High Court upheld SEBI's 2017 circular permitting buyback by exclusively listed companies as a valid exit mechanism, dismissed the petition challenging Bharat Nidhi Limited's buyback process, and affirmed that minority shareholders cannot stall duly approved corporate actions.

corporate petition_dismissed Significant SEBI circular July 25, 2017 buyback of shares minimum public shareholding norms Companies Act Section 68

The Chartered Institute of Taxation v. Institute of Chartered Tax Advisers of India Ltd.

22 Aug 2019 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2019:DHC:4128

The Delhi High Court held that opposition proceedings before the Registrar of Trade Marks do not constitute groundless threats under Section 142 and dismissed the suit seeking injunction against such proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 142 Trade Marks Act groundless threats opposition proceedings Registrar of Trade Marks

Sushila v. Airport Authority of India & Anr.

22 Aug 2019 · Hima Kohli; Asha Menon · 2019:DHC:4127-DB

The Delhi High Court held that disputes over Service Tax liability under a contract containing an arbitration clause must be resolved through arbitration, dismissing writ petitions seeking return of security deposits withheld pending tax adjudication.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Service Tax Fixed Deposit Receipts Arbitration Clause Writ Petition

Anil Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi

22 Aug 2019 · Mukta Gupta · 2019:DHC:7692

The Delhi High Court dismissed parole petitions based on fake medical certificates issued by an unregistered practitioner and directed FIR registration and investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed parole medical certificate fake documents medical practitioner registration

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Anoop Jain

22 Aug 2019 · S. Muralidhar; Talwant Singh · 2019:DHC:4112-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of a Rs.5.17 crore addition under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, holding that the Assessee was not the owner of the disputed funds and satisfactorily explained their source.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 69A Income Tax Act unexplained income ownership of money burden of proof

Padamjit Singh v. N.D.M.C.

22 Aug 2019 · Hima Kohli; Asha Menon · 2019:DHC:4116-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld NDMC's cancellation of tehbazari permission granted to a commercial company for operating weighing machines, holding that such licences are meant only for economically weaker sections and not for commercial enterprises.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tehbazari permission street vendors natural justice permanent structure

Dwarkaprasad v. Union of India

22 Aug 2019 · S. Muralidhar; Talwant Singh · 2019:DHC:7925-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking declaration of lapsing of land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act for lands situated in unauthorized colonies, holding that such relief is legally untenable and petitioners relying on General Power of Attorney lack locus standi.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 unauthorized colony

Devki Nandan @ Devi Singh v. State

22 Aug 2019 · Mukta Gupta · 2019:DHC:4122

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 307 IPC of a husband who assaulted his wife with a tawa, emphasizing the accused's failure to explain the injury under Section 106 of the Evidence Act and corroborative forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 307 IPC Attempt to murder Section 106 Indian Evidence Act Burden of proof

Pankaj Oswal v. Aruna Oswal & Ors.

22 Aug 2019 · Jayant Nath · 2019:DHC:4123

The Delhi High Court allowed defendants to amend their written statement to add new defenses including disinheritance by oral family settlement, affirming a liberal approach to amendments under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC where no admissions are retracted causing prejudice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of written statement Order 6 Rule 17 CPC admissions in pleadings oral family settlement

Imran v. State

22 Aug 2019 · Manmohan; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2019:DHC:4125-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for rape, robbery, and criminal intimidation based on credible prosecutrix testimony corroborated by DNA evidence and recovery of stolen property, dismissing the appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape Section 376 IPC DNA evidence Test Identification Parade

Shikhar Gupta v. Union of India & Ors.

22 Aug 2019 · D.N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:4129-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking leniency to alter medical college choice after second round counselling, upholding the automatic cancellation of prior provisional admission as per MBBS admission rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed MBBS admission counselling rules provisional admission second round counselling

Indra Chand Jain v. Jaideep Gupta

21 Aug 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:4103

The Delhi High Court dismissed contempt petitions for alleged violation of interim orders, holding that wilful disobedience with knowledge is essential and that legal heirs acting without such knowledge under compelling circumstances cannot be held liable.

civil petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court interim orders status quo wilful disobedience

Indra Chand Jain v. Jaideep Gupta

21 Aug 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:4099

The Delhi High Court dismissed contempt petitions for alleged violation of interim orders, holding that lack of knowledge and financial duress negated wilful disobedience required for contempt.

civil petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court interim orders status quo wilful disobedience

Raj Kumar Kathuria v. State (GNCT of Delhi)

21 Aug 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:4098

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving allegations of assault and rape, relying on CCTV evidence and inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's statements.

criminal appeal_allowed bail Section 376 IPC assault CCTV evidence

Bhushan Kumar v. State (GNCT of Delhi)

21 Aug 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:4097

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving alleged assault and attempted break-in, finding prima facie evidence of false implication and inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's allegations.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail false implication CCTV evidence possession dispute