Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Financial Intelligence Unit-IND v. Axis Bank Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Appellate Tribunal's reduction of monetary penalties to warnings under the amended Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, ruling that the beneficial amendment applies retrospectively to violations alleged before its enactment.
Financial Intelligence Unit-IND v. Axis Bank Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Appellate Tribunal's reduction of monetary penalties to warnings under the amended Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, applying the beneficial provisions retrospectively to violations alleged in a sting operation exposing banks' failure to report suspicious transactions.
Financial Intelligence Unit-IND v. Axis Bank Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Appellate Tribunal's reduction of penalties from monetary fines to warnings under the amended Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, applying the beneficial amendment retrospectively due to lack of evidence that violations occurred before the amendment date.
Financial Intelligence Unit-IND v. Axis Bank Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Appellate Tribunal's reduction of penalties from fines to warnings under the amended Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, holding that the beneficial amendment applies retrospectively.
Dheeraj v. Vijay Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced the functional disability from 29% to 40% for a labourer injured in a motor accident, increasing compensation for loss of future earnings accordingly.
United India Insurance Company Ltd v. Hina
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal for non-production of the policy, holding it liable to pay compensation to the pillion rider under a valid insurance policy.
Vijay Kumar & Ors v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
Sir Sobha Singh & Sons (P) Ltd v. Kamal Nursery & Anr
The High Court allowed the petitioner's appeal under Article 227 to produce previously unknown writ petition records, setting aside the trial court's order and emphasizing the discretionary supervisory jurisdiction to correct manifest errors.
BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. RAM AVATAR MITTAL
The Delhi High Court held that children’s dependency on a deceased parent is not negated by age or marriage and adjusted compensation amounts accordingly in a motor accident claim appeal.
Sarla & Ors. v. Sh B K Moti & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced motor accident compensation by applying correct dependency deductions, awarding loss of consortium and love and affection to each claimant, and adding future prospects as per Supreme Court precedents.
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. POOJA KUMARI & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal against the compensation award based on government-notified minimum wages, holding that such wages cannot be altered merely because they are under Supreme Court adjudication.
Financial Intelligence Unit - Ind v. Kotak Mahindra Bank
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of a penalty imposed on a bank for non-reporting of suspicious transactions following a Cobrapost sting operation, holding that a prior warning letter closed the proceedings and the penalty was an afterthought.
Pritam Lal Makhija v. Akhil Bhartiya Aggarwal Sammelan
The High Court held that eviction under Section 14(1)(e) requires a bonafide need for additional accommodation, set aside the rejection of leave to defend, and allowed the tenant to contest the eviction petition.
Kanwaljit Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the government's decision to pay a uniform Overseas Subsistence Allowance to all ranks of UN Formed Police Units, rejecting claims of discrimination under Article 14.
Commandant V.S. Shekhawat v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that all entries in a public servant's ACR, including below benchmark gradings, must be communicated to enable representation, overruling the 2006 DoPT OM and directing reconsideration of the petitioner's promotion eligibility.
Arvind Ghildiyal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that failure to supply inquiry findings and recommendations before imposing administrative punishment violates natural justice and quashed the DG's displeasure order against a BSF officer.
Tinku & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of settlement between the parties and the complainant's unwillingness to prosecute further.
Gagandeep Singh Bajaj & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Jonu @ Monu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 287 and 304A IPC on settlement and compensation grounds, directing additional compensation for the deceased's minor children.
Ritu v. Sandeep Kumar Prashar
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an application to set aside an ex-parte decree of Judicial Separation, holding that refusal to accept summons sent by registered post constitutes valid service and the application was time barred.