Delhi High Court

48,408 judgments

Year:

Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Manoj Singh @ Manoj Chandrawanshi & Anr

02 Sep 2019 · R.K. Gauba · 2019:DHC:4284

The Delhi High Court set aside a compensation award for 100% permanent disability under the Employees’ Compensation Act due to insufficient evidence and remitted the matter for further inquiry.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 permanent disability compensation disability certificate

Sh. Ram Chander Dhawan v. Sh. Shiv Ram & Ors

02 Sep 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:4294

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation awarded to an elderly motor accident victim for attendant charges, pain and suffering, and related heads, applying principles of notional attendant services and age-based pain assessment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant attendant charges compensation enhancement pain and suffering loss of amenities

Sushma Lodhi & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

02 Sep 2019 · Vipin Sanghi; Sanjeev Narula · 2019:DHC:4288-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging decades-old land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, holding that stale claims barred by delay and laches cannot be revived.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 delay and laches

Ali Asgar v. Om Prakash Rai & Ors

02 Sep 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:4291

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim with 74% permanent disability, awarding increased damages for loss of future prospects, pain and suffering, and directing provision of a motorized wheelchair with lifetime warranty.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor vehicular accident permanent physical impairment functional disability loss of future earning capacity

M/S ROOP SAREES & ANR. v. ATUL KAPOOR & ORS.

02 Sep 2019 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2019:DHC:4283

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s order allowing amendment of the plaint to add relief for arrears of rent after trial commencement, holding such amendment permissible if the relief was already pleaded and limitation is a matter for trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of plaint arrears of rent limitation

The Chief General Manager, M/s Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited v. Driplex Water Engineering Ltd.

02 Sep 2019 · Vibhu Bahru · 2019:DHC:4282

The Delhi High Court upheld the jurisdiction of the MSEF Council to refer disputes involving a registered small enterprise to arbitration under the MSMED Act, rejecting challenges based on timing of registration and investment thresholds.

civil petition_dismissed Significant MSMED Act small enterprise jurisdiction Section 18(3)

Mohd. Tahir v. Khwaja Syed Mohd Mehdi Nizami

02 Sep 2019 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2019:DHC:4281

The Delhi High Court upheld the power of the Rent Controller to appoint a Local Commissioner, including an advocate, to inspect premises in eviction proceedings under the Delhi Rent Control Act, rejecting the tenant’s challenge that such appointment improperly assists a party in evidence collection.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Local Commissioner Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC eviction proceedings

Philomena Gervase & Anr. v. Ravin Mehra & Anr.

02 Sep 2019 · R. K. Gauba · 2019:DHC:4286

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellants' appeal by staying eviction subject to payment of mesne profits pending trial of their civil suit challenging title to the property.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction eviction Delhi Rent Control Act mesne profits

CITI GROUP INC. & Ors. v. CITI FINANCE SERVICE & Anr.

02 Sep 2019 · Mukta Gupta · 2019:DHC:4296

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and decree against defendants for infringing the plaintiffs' registered CITI trademarks and using their IFSC code fraudulently, ordering transfer of domain name and awarding costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction deceptive similarity

Sachin Talwar v. Sandeep Agrawal

02 Sep 2019 · Mukta Gupta · 2019:DHC:4287

The Delhi High Court decreed specific performance of a valid agreement to sell immovable property where the plaintiff was ready and willing to perform but the defendant breached the contract by refusing to execute the sale deed.

civil appeal_allowed specific performance agreement to sell immovable property breach of contract

Subhash Chand Goel & Ors. v. Hans Raj Gupta & Co Pvt Ltd

02 Sep 2019 · Prateek Jalan · 2019:DHC:4277

The Delhi High Court held that amalgamation of a tenant company transfers tenancy rights constituting sub-letting under Section 14(1)(b) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, and eviction petitions on such grounds are not barred by limitation.

property appeal_allowed Significant amalgamation sub-letting Delhi Rent Control Act Section 14(1)(b)

Suresh Jain v. Mandeep Singh Batra & Ors.

02 Sep 2019 · Prateek Jalan · 2019:DHC:4278

The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of the plaint after trial commencement under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, holding that due diligence was exercised and the amendment added an alternative relief without altering the suit's fundamental nature.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of pleadings due diligence possession

M/S TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD v. M/S RAJAT ELECTRICALS

02 Sep 2019 · Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:4279

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Section 27 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to summon witnesses and compel production of documents to assist arbitration proceedings with the consent of parties.

civil petition_allowed Section 27 Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 summoning witnesses production of documents arbitration assistance

Mohinder Jeet Singh v. BMW India Pvt Ltd & Ors.

02 Sep 2019 · Prateek Jalan · 2019:DHC:4280

The Delhi High Court set aside the deletion of manufacturer and authorized dealer from a suit alleging manufacturing defects in a car, holding that their presence as necessary parties cannot be negated at the preliminary stage without trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order I Rule 10 CPC deletion of parties necessary party proper party

Anil Kumar v. Devender Kumar & Ors.

02 Sep 2019 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2019:DHC:4285

The court held that only the property originally belonging to the mother is subject to partition among heirs, dismissing claims over other properties purchased in defendants' names from grocery store earnings absent proof of joint family business.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition suit joint family business coparcenary benami property

Sudesh Kumar @ Chhotu v. Om Prakash Rai & Ors

02 Sep 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:4295

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a young bilateral below-knee amputee laborer, recognizing 100% functional disability and ordering provision of prosthetic limbs and a motorized wheelchair.

civil appeal_allowed Significant permanent physical impairment functional disability loss of future earning capacity pain and suffering

The Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd v. Ram Chander Dhawan & Ors.

02 Sep 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:4290

The Delhi High Court held that a driving licence for LMV does not authorize driving a three-wheeler commercial vehicle, entitling the insurer to recover compensation paid from the insured for breach of policy conditions, while upholding the compensation award.

motor_accident_claims / insurance / criminal_liability appeal_dismissed Significant driving licence three wheeler scooter insurance policy breach motor accident claims tribunal

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. SAVITA & ORS

02 Sep 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:4289

The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurer's appeal by reducing future prospects compensation and applying Haryana minimum wages, while affirming the married daughter's dependency for motor accident claim compensation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loss of future prospects minimum wages dependency married daughter

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd. v. Sanu Bala & Ors.

30 Aug 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:4273

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal, holding that the accident was solely caused by the rash and negligent driving of the insured overloaded vehicle, with no contributory negligence by the deceased driver, thereby upholding the compensation awarded by the MACT.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim contributory negligence head-on collision rash and negligent driving

Caper Travel Company Pvt Ltd v. Rohit Srivastava

30 Aug 2019 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2019:DHC:4265

Execution of a decree for injunction under Order XXI Rule 32 CPC requires proof of wilful disobedience with mens rea, and mere implied admissions are insufficient to order detention or attachment.

civil other Significant Execution of decree Order XXI Rule 32 CPC Settlement Agreement Wilful disobedience