Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Satish Kumar v. Ashok Kumar Bhalla
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a revision petition against eviction on the tenant's undertaking to vacate the premises by a specified date and pay arrears, staying eviction execution accordingly.
Naresh Kumar v. Pritam Sharma
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a revision petition against eviction under bona fide necessity, stayed eviction execution till a specified date on tenant's undertaking to vacate and pay use and occupation charges.
Musaraf Ahmad v. Pritam Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant’s revision petition as withdrawn and stayed execution of an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, upon the tenant’s undertaking to vacate by a fixed date and pay use and occupation charges.
Giriraj & Anr v. Sheela Devi & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' challenge to the dismissal of their leave to defend application in an eviction proceeding due to absence of landlord-tenant relationship, allowing withdrawal with liberty to pursue other remedies.
Tarun Nagpal v. M/S Auto Incline & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s appeal to recall his cross-examination and set aside the order striking off his evidence, subject to costs and directions for expeditious trial.
Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Ltd v. LRS of Sonu & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer must pay compensation to claimants even if the deceased was a gratuitous passenger and may recover the amount later from the insured owner/driver under the 'pay and recover' principle.
Ali Hassan & Anr v. Ram Dhan & Ors
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by awarding loss of future prospects, loss of consortium, love and affection, loss of estate, and funeral expenses based on Supreme Court precedents.
Potiram and Ors. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions by hawkers seeking to restrain their removal from Tagore Road, holding that hawking licensees have limited rights and may be removed if obstructing traffic, with alternative sites to be sought through Town Vending Committees.
Mohd Tofique v. Oriental Ins Co Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that non-possession of a driving licence by a minor rider does not bar compensation if the accident was caused by rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle, setting aside the MACT award and remanding for fresh adjudication.
Mohd Tofique v. Oriental Ins Co Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that non-possession of a driving licence by a minor rider does not bar compensation if the accident was caused by the rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle, and remanded the case for fresh adjudication.
Shiv Shankar Mehto v. Markandey Mishra
The Delhi High Court upheld medical and related expense compensation but set aside loss of wages due to lack of proof, reducing the total award on appellant's request.
Mohd. Wahid & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308 and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties.
Sikander & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308, 341, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties.
M/S Krishna Ferro Products Ltd. & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 420, and 120B IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Deepak Nanda @ Vicky Nanda v. The State of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of cheating and criminal conspiracy due to serious allegations, non-cooperation with investigation, and necessity of custodial interrogation at the initial stage.
Rajinder Narang v. The State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Rajinder Narang in a cheating and criminal conspiracy case involving misrepresentation of property encumbrances.
Rahul Narang v. The State of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was dismissed where the petitioner was found prima facie involved in criminal conspiracy and cheating by misrepresenting encumbrances on property sold to the complainant.
Shefali Narang v. The State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of criminal conspiracy and cheating by misrepresenting encumbrance-free status of mortgaged property in a sale transaction.
Sunita Devi v. Bharti Axa General Insurance Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to enhance compensation in a motor accident claim by applying the correct multiplier, granting loss of future prospects, and adding 40% to loss of dependency as per Supreme Court precedent.
Sarva Chintan Foundation v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the PIL challenging the 2017 policy on milk stall allotments at railway platforms, holding that the court will not interfere with valid policy decisions made by the executive under Article 226.