Delhi High Court

48,408 judgments

Year:

Sunil Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.

21 Oct 2019 · Brijesh Sethi · 2019:DHC:5415

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

Naresh Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

21 Oct 2019 · D.N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:5416-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the PIL seeking action against illegal liquor and narcotics sale, directing respondents to continue departmental proceedings against erring police officials and to stop illegal activities without further court monitoring.

criminal petition_dismissed illegal liquor sale narcotics peddling gambling activities departmental proceedings

Oxbridge Associates Limited v. Atul Kumra

21 Oct 2019 · Prateek Jalan · 2019:DHC:5382

The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff for refund of advance payments under cancelled purchase orders, rejecting the defendant's claim of deductions and denial of contract privity.

civil appeal_allowed Significant summary judgment Order XIII-A CPC decree upon admission privity of contract

A.K. Bhagat v. Union of India

21 Oct 2019 · Vipin Sanghi; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2019:DHC:5381-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a Disagreement Note must reflect a tentative opinion and grant a genuine opportunity to represent before final disciplinary findings, but a belated challenge to its finality is estopped if not raised at the earliest stage.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Disagreement Note Disciplinary Authority Principles of Natural Justice Tentative opinion

Rohit Gupta v. State

21 Oct 2019 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2019:DHC:5380

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a husband for cruelty and abetment of his wife's suicide under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC, applying the statutory presumption under Section 113A of the Evidence Act despite absence of dowry demand.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 498-A IPC Section 306 IPC abetment of suicide cruelty

CCE Delhi North v. Jindal Nickel and Alloys Ltd

21 Oct 2019 · D. N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:5405-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal upholding the CESTAT's finding that the respondents lacked capacity to clandestinely manufacture SS ingots and that computer printouts were inadmissible evidence under Section 36B of the Central Excise Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 36B production capacity computer printouts admissibility

Ram Dhruv & Ors. v. Land Acquisition Collector/Adm & Ors.

21 Oct 2019 · Vipin Sanghi; Sanjeev Narula · 2019:DHC:6192-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that purchasers of land after Section 4 notification acquire no title and cannot claim lapsing of acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, dismissing the petition challenging land acquisition in Roshanpura.

property petition_dismissed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 4 notification Void transaction

Manoj Laxmichand Rathore & Anr v. State (Govt. of NCT, Delhi)

18 Oct 2019 · Brijesh Sethi · 2019:DHC:5371

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of proclaimed offenders accused of cheating in a large-scale economic offence, emphasizing the risk of evidence tampering and denying bail despite parity claims.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail proclaimed offender economic offences cheating

Deepak v. State

18 Oct 2019 · Brijesh Sethi · 2019:DHC:5373

The Delhi High Court granted a two-month extension of interim bail on humanitarian grounds to enable the petitioner to care for his ailing sister.

criminal bail_granted interim bail bail extension humanitarian grounds family care

Mukesh Gupta v. The State of Delhi

18 Oct 2019 · Brijesh Sethi · 2019:DHC:5372

The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner accused of theft, holding that serious allegations and non-cooperation with investigation justified custodial interrogation.

criminal appeal_dismissed anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC theft Section 380 IPC

Puran Murti School of Education v. Satbir Bedi

18 Oct 2019 · D.N. Patel; C.Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:5370-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed contempt petitions against NCTE officials for allegedly breaching its order by holding recognition proceedings without requiring an NOC, finding no wilful disobedience.

administrative petition_dismissed contempt petition No Objection Certificate recognition of educational institutions National Council for Teacher Education

Ranvir Singh v. Rajinder Kumar Jain

18 Oct 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:5354

The High Court granted leave to defend to the tenant in an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that bonafide necessity must be established by prima facie material distinct from mere desire.

property appeal_allowed Significant eviction bonafide necessity Delhi Rent Control Act leave to defend

Jayant Vikram v. Additional Commissioner of Customs

18 Oct 2019 · D. N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:5377-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed an ex-parte customs adjudication order due to non-receipt of notice and remanded the matter for fresh hearing in accordance with natural justice.

administrative appeal_allowed show cause notice ex-parte order natural justice non-receipt of notice

Shri Baljeet Singh & Ors. v. State & Anr.

18 Oct 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5357

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC discontinuation of prosecution

Vinod Sharma v. State & Anr.

18 Oct 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5358

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR and proceedings arising therefrom following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute

Shri Ravi & Anr. v. State & Ors.

18 Oct 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5359

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving grievous injuries following settlement between parties and imposed costs on the petitioners as a condition for quashing.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC settlement between parties imposition of costs

Kartar Singh v. Delite Techno Build Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

18 Oct 2019 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2019:DHC:5360

The Delhi High Court held that an executant seeking cancellation of a Sale Deed must pay ad valorem court fee and that the plaint was liable to be rejected for improper valuation, dismissing the suit challenging the Sale Deed and mutation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Sale Deed Executant vs Non-executant Court Fees Possession

Kharak Singh Negi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

18 Oct 2019 · D. N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:5361-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the government to provide pipeline water supply to residents of Sangam Vihar area, balancing development needs with legal restrictions on forest land.

administrative petition_allowed Public Interest Litigation water supply pipeline water supply forest land

Mihir Sattavan v. University of Delhi and Anr.

18 Oct 2019 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2019:DHC:5363

The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to declare the petitioner’s second semester exam result, holding that absence of a detention order and prior permission to appear preclude withholding the result.

administrative petition_allowed Significant University examination result Promotion rules Detention order Legitimate expectation

Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Vernita Garg & Ors.

18 Oct 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:5378

The Delhi High Court upheld the MACT's compensation award against an insurer, holding that rash and negligent driving by the offending vehicle caused grievous injury to a pedestrian despite absence of a zebra crossing.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim rash and negligent driving pedestrian crossing compensation