Delhi High Court

48,761 judgments

Year:

Bilal Ahmad @ Bilal Hussain v. Ram Dayal & Ors

06 Nov 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:5796

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim for grievous injuries including amputation, recognizing extended loss of income, pain and suffering, and loss of marriage prospects.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation enhancement loss of income pain and suffering

Vineet Gupta v. Suraj Holdings Ltd. & Anr.

05 Nov 2019 · Mukta Gupta · 2019:DHC:7821

The Delhi High Court dismissed civil suits as withdrawn, holding that objections to the arbitration agreement's validity must be raised under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, not before the civil court.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement jurisdiction Section 16 Arbitration and Conciliation Act civil court

State (Govt NCT of Delhi) v. Talib

05 Nov 2019 · Manmohan; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2019:DHC:5755-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a sexual assault case due to contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing that sole testimony must be credible to sustain conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sole testimony sexual offence POCSO Act presumption of guilt

Narcotics Control Bureau v. Gaurav Kumar

05 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5752

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order directing preservation of call detail records and bank statements under Section 91 CrPC as necessary for the accused's defense, while limiting the scope to relevant dates.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 91 CrPC Call Detail Records Preservation of evidence Narcotics Control Bureau

IDBI BANK LTD & ANR v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS

05 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5751

The Delhi High Court set aside a trial court order against IDBI Bank, holding that the bank acted in good faith under the SARFAESI Act in auctioning mortgaged property despite a disputed Income Tax attachment, but imposed costs for non-disclosure to the auction purchaser.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act, 2002 Section 32 SARFAESI Act Income Tax attachment order Non-Performing Asset

Inder Lal Marwah v. Secretary Ministry of Health & Family Welfare & Ors.

05 Nov 2019 · D.N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:5754-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Government's amended CGHS scheme and tender process, dismissing the petition challenging removal of distance criteria and procedural changes aimed at preventing misuse.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Government Health Services Scheme CGHS welfare scheme amendment tender process

State (NCT of Delhi) v. Om Prakash@Fufaji

05 Nov 2019 · Manmohan; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2019:DHC:5753-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of an accused in a child sexual assault case due to material contradictions in the victim's testimony and lack of corroborative medical evidence, emphasizing that conviction on sole testimony requires it to inspire confidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sexual assault sole testimony victim credibility POCSO Act

Meenakshi & Ors v. Ranjeet & Ors

05 Nov 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:5726

The Delhi High Court corrected the wage figure for loss of dependency and granted additional compensation for loss of love and affection and consortium in a motor accident claim, enhancing the award against the insurer.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of dependency minimum wages loss of love and affection

Manoj Kumar Jain v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

05 Nov 2019 · Rekha Palli · 2019:DHC:5722

The Delhi High Court upheld an order holding the proprietor liable to pay unpaid wages to a worker employed through a Contractor, dismissing the proprietor's writ petition challenging the order.

labor appeal_dismissed Delhi Shops and Establishments Act, 1954 unpaid wages Contractor liability ex-parte order

MS. SANCHI DILAVARI v. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR.

05 Nov 2019 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2019:DHC:5721

The Delhi High Court held that the University of Delhi's mid-stream scaling down of marks for Multimedia and Web Technology was arbitrary and unfair, directing admission of the petitioner without such scaling, and allowing filling of vacant reserved seats by general category candidates.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Admission criteria Scaling down of marks Multimedia and Web Technology CBSE Circular 2003

Anju Bala v. GAIL (India) Limited and Ors.

05 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5718

The Delhi High Court set aside the disciplinary removal of an employee for unauthorized foreign travel due to lack of proper service of charge memo and invalid authority passing the removal order, emphasizing natural justice and procedural compliance.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings charge memo service removal from service appointing authority

Director, Directorate of Income Tax (HRD) v. Ramesh Dang & Ors.

05 Nov 2019 · S. Muralidhar; Talwant Singh · 2019:DHC:5719-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order granting pay parity to Technical Assistants with Inspectors of Income Tax, holding that pay scale determination is an executive function requiring expert recommendations and that the posts are not identical for equal pay claims.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant pay scale parity Technical Assistants Inspectors of Income Tax Central Administrative Tribunal

Jaspal Singh v. Union of India

05 Nov 2019 · S. Muralidhar; Talwant Singh · 2019:DHC:5720-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld a Review DPC's retrospective promotion and seniority revision of an officer despite adverse ACR entries, holding that pending appeals render such entries non-operative and no show cause notice was required to affected juniors.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Departmental Promotion Committee Annual Confidential Report Adverse remarks Average grading

Vandana Kaushik v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Nov 2019 · Chief Justice; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:5749-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking investigation and prosecution of alleged financial frauds, holding that the petitioner must first exhaust the remedy of lodging a police complaint or FIR before invoking writ jurisdiction.

constitutional petition_dismissed Public Interest Litigation writ petition exhaustion of remedies FIR

Visually Impaired Bank Employees Welfare Association v. Ministry of Finance

05 Nov 2019 · D. N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:5748-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the concerned authority to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide it in accordance with law and policy after hearing the petitioners.

administrative other writ petition representation administrative decision opportunity of hearing

ZEE TURNER LTD. & ANR. v. SOCIETY OF CATALYSTS & ORS.

05 Nov 2019 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2019:DHC:5750

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging a State Commission order, directing petitioners to pursue their remedy before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 2019 National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission writ petition statutory remedy

State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) v. Vinod Kumar & Ors.

05 Nov 2019 · Manmohan; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2019:DHC:5747-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of accused in a dowry-related murder case due to inadmissibility of confessional statement and failure of prosecution to prove cruelty and dowry demand beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant confessional statement Section 25 Indian Evidence Act dowry harassment Sections 498A, 304B IPC

Vinod K. Jangid & Ors. v. State & Anr.

05 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5733

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, directing withdrawal of all related cases and release of the settlement amount upon consent for divorce.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute mediation settlement

Gaurav Thapar & Ors. v. The State Through Govt of NCT of Delhi

05 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5731

The Delhi High Court quashed a 2008 FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, imposing costs on petitioners for prolonged litigation.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

Pradeep Arora v. State & Anr.

05 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5730

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 338 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 279 IPC Section 338 IPC amicable settlement