Delhi High Court

48,761 judgments

Year:

National Insurance Co Ltd v. Richa Bhatnagar & Ors.

06 Nov 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:5773

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal to increase the deduction towards personal expenses from one-fourth to one-third in calculating loss of dependency and upheld the award of compensation including non-pecuniary damages in a motor accident claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loss of dependency personal expenses deduction motor accident compensation loss of love and affection

Nishat Ahmad Khan v. State & Anr

06 Nov 2019 · D. N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:5777-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal, directing the Trial Court to decide the criminal case on merits without being influenced by the High Court's earlier dismissal of the writ petition.

criminal appeal_dismissed Letters Patent Appeal writ petition dismissal trial court primacy criminal trial

M/S RVJ Musical Private Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.

06 Nov 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2019:DHC:5776-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a technical bid in an LPG bottling plant tender, holding that the rejection was neither mala fide nor arbitrary and emphasizing limited judicial interference in tender decisions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender rejection mala fide technical bid opportunity to cure

M/S ARORA & CO v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

06 Nov 2019 · VIPIN SANGHI; SANJEEV NARULA · 2019:DHC:5766-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file Form TRAN-1 for GST transitional credit despite missing the deadline due to technical glitches, holding the time limit as procedural and directory.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST transitional credit Form TRAN-1 Section 140(3) CGST Act Rule 117 CGST Rules

PURE MILK PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. v. M/S RAMSONS

06 Nov 2019 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2019:DHC:5767

The Delhi High Court held that in a contractual recovery suit, the Plaintiff must lead evidence first to prove supply and entitlement before the Defendant can prove defects, setting aside the Trial Court’s direction to the contrary.

civil other Significant onus of proof order of leading evidence contractual dispute recovery suit

Nalin Gulati v. State & Anr.

06 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5764

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties and withdrawal of prosecution by the complainant.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement matrimonial dispute complainant withdrawal

Sumeet Doonga & Ors. v. The State & Anr.

06 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5765

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC withdrawal of complaint

Arvind Kumar & Ors v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

06 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5768

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's unwillingness to prosecute further.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement matrimonial dispute

Rajeev Kapoor & Ors. v. State & Anr.

06 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5769

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties and withdrawal of prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

State v. Anil @ Kallu @ Thakur

06 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5770

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discharge of the accused under Section 12 of the POCSO Act due to absence of sexual intent in the victim's statement.

criminal appeal_dismissed POCSO Act Section 12 POCSO sexual intent discharge

Akash @ Bhole v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

06 Nov 2019 · Manmohan; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2019:DHC:5771-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder under Sections 302/34 IPC, affirming witness credibility, admissibility of weapon recovery under Section 27 Evidence Act, and rejecting claims of false implication.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC Section 174-A IPC Section 27 Indian Evidence Act

Jasdan Energy Pvt. Ltd. v. Inox Wind Limited & Anr.

06 Nov 2019 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2019:DHC:5772

The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension for completion of arbitral proceedings and passing of the award under Sections 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, based on mutual consent and ongoing proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A extension of time arbitral proceedings

Ram Pal v. I.B.P. Co. Ltd

06 Nov 2019 · Rekha Palli · 2019:DHC:5757

The Delhi High Court set aside the Labour Court’s award rejecting the petitioner’s claim for employment, holding that the employer-employee relationship must be properly examined with all material evidence, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.

labor appeal_allowed Significant employer-employee relationship Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2(j) Labour Court

M/S Silica Infotech Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.

06 Nov 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2019:DHC:5803-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a technical bid in an LPG bottling plant tender, holding that judicial interference is unwarranted absent arbitrariness or mala fide in the administrative decision.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant judicial review tender rejection arbitrariness mala fide

M/S Lion Heart Secure Solution Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.

06 Nov 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2019:DHC:5802-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a technical bid in an LPG bottling plant tender, holding that the decision was a reasonable exercise of contractual discretion free from arbitrariness or mala fide.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant judicial review tender rejection arbitrariness mala fide

M/S Silica Infotech Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.

06 Nov 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2019:DHC:5801-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of a technical bid in an LPG bottling plant tender, holding that the tendering authority’s decision was neither arbitrary nor mala fide and emphasizing judicial restraint in tender matters.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant judicial review tender rejection technical bid arbitrariness

M/S Lion Heart Secure Solution Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.

06 Nov 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2019:DHC:5799-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner's technical bid in an LPG bottling plant tender, holding that the rejection was lawful and not arbitrary or mala fide.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant judicial review tender rejection mala fide arbitrariness

M/S Silica Infotech Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.

06 Nov 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2019:DHC:5798-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of the petitioner’s technical bid in an LPG bottling plant tender, holding that the rejection was justified due to non-compliance with essential tender conditions and absent mala fide or arbitrariness.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant judicial review tender rejection technical bid arbitrariness

M/S A.R. HOSE PVT. LTD. v. Union of India and Anr.

06 Nov 2019 · G.S. Sistani; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2019:DHC:5797-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a technical bid in an LPG bottling tender, holding that judicial interference is limited to cases of arbitrariness or mala fides and upholding the administrative decision based on safety and tender conditions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant judicial review government tender technical bid rejection arbitrariness

M/S A.R. HOSE PVT. LTD. v. Union of India and Anr.

06 Nov 2019 · G.S. Sistani; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2019:DHC:5800-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a technical bid for failure to submit a registered lease deed, holding that judicial interference in tender decisions is limited to cases of arbitrariness or mala fides.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant judicial review tender rejection registered lease deed arbitrariness