Delhi High Court
48,761 judgments
DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD v. IVRCL -TANTIA (JV) G-1 & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, holding that limited judicial interference is warranted only when an arbitral award is palpably erroneous or perverse, and upheld the dismissal of claims unsupported by proved evidence.
Poonam Jaiswal v. DDA and Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing DDA to allot an alternative flat to the petitioner after condoning delay in payment and quashing the rejection of possession despite full payment.
CYNORLMPEX v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (EXPORT)
The Delhi High Court held that service of a customs order on the authorized representative is valid service on the party, and re-service is not required, though a copy may be provided without extending the limitation period for appeal.
Master Avyaan Rastogi v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a PIL directing the State to maintain and expand feeding and changing rooms for infants in public places, recognizing the steps already taken and the draft policy under finalization.
Court on Its Own Motion v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a PIL after the Medical Council of India adopted and published guidelines regulating doctors' sexual conduct, ending the Court's supervisory role.
MS K SHARADA v. STATE & ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition and discharged the accused after the parties amicably settled the criminal dispute and the complainant withdrew prosecution.
MS K SHARADA v. STATE
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 3(1)(ix) of the SC/ST Act following an amicable settlement and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.
MS K SHARADA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to quash the Inspection Report and summoning order following an amicable settlement between the parties, thereby ending the criminal proceedings.
Maya Devi & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed registration of FIR and thorough police investigation into the suspicious death despite negative viscera report, emphasizing the duty of police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. when complaint discloses cognizable offence.
Prashant Bansal v. Naseer Ahmed & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging eviction as withdrawn and stayed execution of the eviction order until 30.11.2020 subject to the tenant's undertaking to vacate and pay use and occupation charges.
Institute for Socialist Education & Vastu Kala Academy v. Pandit Banktesh Jha
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a suit for permanent injunction concerning alleged dispossession from a temple on a public footpath, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to the dismissal of their application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, without prejudice to the respondent's industrial dispute.
Court on its own motion v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court clarified that its observations on police actions against advocates are tentative, barred coercive action against advocates pending inquiry, and urged Bar and Police to resolve differences amicably.
Ayesha Siddiqui v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed police protection for the petitioner in a property dispute despite ownership verification issues and disposed of the petition after ensuring communication channels for emergency assistance.
Mukhtyar Malik @ Sonu & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following amicable settlement and divorce under Muslim law, emphasizing mediation's role in matrimonial disputes.
Harish @ Kalu v. State
The Delhi High Court modified the sentence of a first-time offender convicted under Sections 395 and 457 IPC to the period already undergone, considering his personal and family circumstances.
M/S Avnish Kumar & Associates v. Northern Railway
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award dismissing the contractor's claims, holding that a voluntarily executed Supplementary Agreement constituted full and final settlement barring further claims, and extensions granted under clause 17B did not entitle the contractor to price variation or damages.
Zile Singh v. Santosh @ Santra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to produce witnesses whose evidence was wrongly excluded due to procedural lapses, emphasizing proper verification of affidavits and witness lists before recording evidence in civil trials.
Ashok Hotel (Unit of ITDC) v. Shri Aditya Prasad Nayak
The Delhi High Court set aside an order awarding overtime wages on limitation grounds and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication allowing the claimant to seek condonation of delay under Section 20(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948.
Sudhir Kumar Aggarwal v. Directorate General of GST Intelligence
The Delhi High Court held that a person examined by GST officers is not entitled to have a lawyer present during questioning, modifying its earlier order in line with Supreme Court precedent in Pool Pandi.
Harish Kumar & Anr. v. Naresh Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension for completion of arbitral proceedings beyond the statutory period under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, based on parties' consent.