Delhi High Court
49,110 judgments
Panchshila Co-Operative House Building Society v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court directed the South Delhi Municipal Corporation to continue enforcing MPD-2021 mixed use regulations against violators with due process, dismissing the petitioner’s broader relief claims.
Arpit Bhargava v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the government to enforce copyright laws against unauthorized publication of legislative materials while recognizing the constitutional right to access authentic legal documents.
M/S PRESTRESS WIRE INDUSTRIES v. M/S UPPAL BUILDERS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal under Section 37, upholding the arbitral award and affirming the limited scope of judicial interference under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
Sahil v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that exclusion of candidates who had already secured admission from a special drive admission list without Academic Council approval was illegal and directed consideration of petitioners for admission if seats were available.
Abhishek Mourya v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that supplementary exam results relate back to the main exam date for admission eligibility, allowing a candidate to secure LL.M. admission despite delayed declaration of qualifying results.
Khandwala Enterprise Private Limited v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that CBIC circulars directing officers to disregard binding CESTAT orders are illegal, quashed executive office memoranda interfering with adjudication, and upheld the statutory adjudicatory process for import classification and exemption claims regarding gold coins.
Khandwala Enterprise Private Limited v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that CBIC circulars directing disregard of binding tribunal orders and executive memoranda pre-judging adjudication are illegal, quashing such instructions while upholding the independent adjudication of show cause notices on merits.
Pradip Kumar Ray v. Sh Abhay Raj Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by reassessing functional disability, loss of future prospects, and attendant charges, applying Supreme Court guidelines for just compensation.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. AMRESH KUMAR & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that a vehicle owner who knowingly employs a driver with a fraudulently obtained license is liable to indemnify the insurer, allowing the insurer to recover compensation paid and awarding additional damages for loss of love and affection.
M/S ORIX AUTOINFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES LTD v. SANATAN DAS
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's order allowing a workman's industrial dispute claim despite limitation expiry, emphasizing procedural fairness and the spirit of the Industrial Disputes Act amendments.
State of Delhi v. Manoj Nafri & Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder case due to failure of prosecution to prove last seen evidence and recoveries beyond reasonable doubt, while clarifying the scope of appellate review in appeals against acquittal.
Havells India Limited v. Allauddin A Shaikh
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions and declared the plaintiff's LLOYD trademarks well-known, restraining the defendant from using deceptively similar marks and domain names in a trademark infringement and passing off suit.
Khazana Projects & Industries v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, upholding the validity of the contract terms, repudiation findings, and liquidated damages awarded under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Bank of India v. Pradeep Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court recognized the need for standardized guidelines on payment of fees to Court Receivers under the SARFAESI Act and directed data collection before deciding on the Bank of India's petition challenging repeated fee payments.
Vrinda Ahuja v. Raveen Ahuja
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellate court's setting aside of an ex-parte restraining order on property alienation under the DV Act due to lack of urgency and non-disclosure of prior orders, dismissing the petitioner's challenge.
MS. Ritika Diwan & Anr. v. M/S Supertech Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the arbitration agreement subsists despite termination of the allotment letter and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes regarding property transfer and refund claims.
M/S PREM CATERERS v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of a tender bid for a staff canteen contract due to non-compliance with mandatory experience certificate requirements.
Sudesh Bala and Ors. v. Vinod Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging sale and gift deeds, holding that the plaintiffs failed to prove the suit properties as ancestral or joint Hindu family properties and lacked locus standi to seek declaration and partition.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Parveen Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the insurance company's appeal by modifying compensation based on minimum wages and loss of future prospects, denied loss of expectancy of life damages, and granted recovery rights against the vehicle owner for non-production of documents.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Abdul Sattar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation awarded to the family of a deceased homemaker in motor accident claims, recognizing her economic contribution based on notional income without deduction for personal expenses.