Delhi High Court
49,110 judgments
Fateh Singh v. Delhi Transport Corporation
The Delhi High Court reduced the petitioner’s punishment from 100% to 50% forfeiture of gratuity for submitting a false matriculation certificate, considering his long service and personal circumstances.
Yogesh v. University of Delhi
Delhi High Court upheld the University of Delhi's reduction of sports quota seats to comply with mandatory ECA reservation, dismissing petitions challenging the change as arbitrary and unlawful.
Yogesh v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the University of Delhi's mandatory seat reservation policy for ECA and sports quotas, dismissing petitions challenging reduction of sports quota seats at Shri Ram College of Commerce as not violative of any vested right or legitimate expectation.
Yogesh v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the University of Delhi's revised seat allocation mandating separate ECA and sports quotas, dismissing petitions challenging reduction of sports quota seats after initial publication.
ITD-ITD CEM JV v. Commissioner of Trade & Taxes
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Additional Commissioner's order on interest calculation for VAT refund, holding that the petitioner must avail the statutory appeal remedy under Section 42 of the Delhi VAT Act.
BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. MADHUSUDAN PRASAD GUPTA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that no deduction for personal expenses is warranted from a deceased home-maker's loss of dependency, reduced funeral expenses as per Supreme Court guidelines, and enhanced compensation for loss of consortium and love and affection.
M/S Rajdeep Publicity Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Transport Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted a four-month extension for concluding arbitration proceedings where final arguments had commenced and parties did not object.
Jamil Ahmed v. DTC & Anr.
The Delhi High Court modified a Labour Court award to reduce the monthly deduction from backwages based on a correct assessment of the petitioner’s sporadic earnings from alternate employment.
M/S ADIGEAR INTERNATIONAL v. ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition to remand the appeal to the Employees’ Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal for fresh adjudication on merits subject to the petitioner making the pre-deposit and paying costs within a stipulated time.
Paralympic Committee of India v. S P Sangwan
The Delhi High Court dismissed a Letters Patent Appeal challenging an interim stay on election proceedings, directing the parties to seek early hearing of the writ petition before the Single Judge.
Neeraj Syal v. State Bank of India; Volex Investment and Marketing Company v. State Bank of India
The Delhi High Court held that the DRT/DRAT must take bona fide settlements between banks and borrowers on record and cannot refuse or scrutinize such settlements, directing the tribunals to record and dispose of recovery proceedings accordingly.
Baldev Singh Sethi v. Prem Taneja & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the eviction petition on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, setting aside the earlier order dismissing it.
Geeta Devi v. Mohd Raza & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's appeal in an ejectment suit, holding that admissions in the written statement established tenancy and ownership, and that an oral Agreement to Sell without possession or decree does not bar eviction.
Yogesh Kumar & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges under dowry death provisions, holding that grave suspicion existed despite discrepancies and delay, and that a suicide note is not conclusive evidence at the charge framing stage.
Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Poonam Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the award of compensation under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, dismissing the insurer's appeal challenging the tribunal's suo moto conversion and application of the structured formula.
Yogesh v. Pawan Kumar Bansal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging eviction on bona fide necessity grounds but stayed execution of the eviction order subject to the tenant's undertakings to vacate and pay charges.
Vinod Kumar v. Lalit Kumar Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant’s revision petition as withdrawn and stayed eviction execution until 31.12.2020 based on the tenant’s undertaking to vacate and pay use and occupation charges.
M/S BHAGWAN DAS KHANNA JEWELLERS PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that a Regional Director's order directing a company to change its name is enforceable despite pending civil suits, especially after an injunction restraining use of the disputed name, rendering the writ petition challenging the order infructuous.
Chandro Devi & Ors. v. M/S Manav Bharati India International School & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order allowing impleadment of the society as plaintiff and granting the benefit of the proviso to Section 21(1) of the Limitation Act, holding the omission was a bona fide mistake.
Ananda D.V. v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that criminal proceedings under Sections 376 and 380 IPC cannot be quashed on the basis of settlement or subsequent marriage, as rape is a heinous offence impacting public interest.