Delhi High Court

49,110 judgments

Year:

Narinder Singh Narang & Anr v. State

14 Nov 2019 · Brijesh Sethi · 2019:DHC:5944

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking release of passports and permission to travel abroad by accused involved in serious cheating offences who had evaded investigation and were declared proclaimed offenders.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant bail conditions passport surrender permission to travel abroad cheating

Gaurav Arora & Ors. v. State & Anr.

14 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5946

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR and proceedings following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement compromise criminal proceedings

Shailendra Kumar Poddar v. State & Anr.

14 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5947

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on the parties' amicable settlement and the complainant's non-objection to further prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR settlement between parties Section 482 CrPC inherent powers of High Court

Ashok Kumar Thakur v. State & Anr.

14 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5948

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and all pending proceedings in a matrimonial dispute after the parties amicably settled and resumed living together.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement matrimonial dispute resumption of marital life

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-Central-3 v. Ankush Saluja

14 Nov 2019 · Vipin Sanghi; Sanjeev Narula · 2019:DHC:5949-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld that additions under Section 68 cannot be made under Section 153C in the absence of incriminating documents found during search when the original assessment is complete.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act Section 132 Section 153A Section 153C

Dinesh Kumar Gupta v. Vidya Devi

14 Nov 2019 · D.N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:5968-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the interim status quo order on disputed property possession during pendency of connected writ petitions and disposed of the Letters Patent Appeals accordingly.

civil appeal_dismissed status quo Letters Patent Appeal interim order possession

QUTAB BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. v. EVOLVE INFOTRAIN INDIA PVT. LTD.

14 Nov 2019 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2019:DHC:5966

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit seeking mandatory injunctions for registration and mutation of land sale deeds, holding that statutory remedies under the Registration Act and Delhi Land Revenue Act must be exhausted and that without a registered Sale Deed, the plaintiff has no locus to challenge subsequent registrations.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Registration Act, 1908 Sale Deed registration No Objection Certificate Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax- 2 v. M/S Century Metal Recycling Pvt. Ltd

14 Nov 2019 · Vipin Sanghi; Sanjeev Narula · 2019:DHC:5951-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment proceedings under Section 148 should be kept in abeyance pending outcome of appeals against the tribunal order forming their basis, allowing revival if the revenue succeeds.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act Reassessment proceedings Income Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT order

Kirti @ Pooja v. State

14 Nov 2019 · Brijesh Sethi · 2019:DHC:5952

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of robbery, distinguishing her limited role and considering prior bail and investigation status, subject to conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed bail Section 439 CrPC robbery pillion rider

Jain v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

14 Nov 2019 · Brijesh Sethi · 2019:DHC:5953

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 420 and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and no objection from the complainant.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR settlement deed Section 420 IPC

Neeraj Alias Nagar v. State NCT of Delhi

14 Nov 2019 · Manmohan; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2019:DHC:5965-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 326/34 IPC while acquitting accused of murder charges, affirming the admissibility of weapon recovery under Section 27 Evidence Act and the principle of common intention despite minor discrepancies and absence of motive.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 326 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention

Amit Luhach v. State of NCT Delhi

14 Nov 2019 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2019:DHC:5950

The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking order framing charges for lack of application of mind and remanded the matter for a fresh order indicating satisfaction of a prima facie case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant framing of charge application of mind Section 228 CrPC non-speaking order

Amit Luhach and Akhilesh Yadav v. State of NCT Delhi

14 Nov 2019 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2019:DHC:5954

The Delhi High Court held that the trial court must indicate application of mind when framing charges under Section 228 CrPC, and set aside a non-speaking order lacking such indication, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

criminal other Significant framing of charge Section 228 CrPC application of mind prima facie case

Kamal Luthra v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office

14 Nov 2019 · Brijesh Sethi · 2019:DHC:5955

The Delhi High Court refused to quash NBWs issued against the petitioner for alleged offences under the Companies Act, directing the trial court to consider his applications for cancellation of warrants and bail, while keeping the warrants in abeyance temporarily due to his medical condition.

criminal petition_dismissed Non-Bailable Warrant Section 447 Companies Act Section 482 Cr.P.C. Quashing petition

Anil Kaura @ Sachin v. The State

14 Nov 2019 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2019:DHC:5940

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a murder and attempt to murder case, holding that serious allegations and prima facie involvement preclude bail despite contradictions and delay in FIR.

criminal petition_dismissed bail Section 439 CrPC Section 482 CrPC common intention

M/S SHRI COLONIZERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD v. M/S FELICIA REALCON INDIA PVT LTD

14 Nov 2019 · G.S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2019:DHC:5941-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld conditional leave to defend in a summary suit, requiring the appellant to deposit the claimed amount due to failure to raise a bona fide triable issue and admission of liability by issuance of dishonored cheques.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC summary suit leave to defend conditional leave

Glencore International AG v. M/S Shree Ganesh Metals & Anr

14 Nov 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2019:DHC:5942-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that no valid arbitration agreement existed in the unsigned 2016 contract, and thus the dispute was not referable to arbitration under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

commercial_arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement incorporation by reference standard form contract Section 45 Arbitration Act

Poonam Devi & Ors. v. Shriram General Insurance Company Limited & Anr

14 Nov 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:5969

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking enhancement of compensation under Section 166, upholding the award under Section 163A due to lack of credible evidence of rash and negligent driving.

civil appeal_dismissed Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Section 163A rash and negligent driving

Praveen Kumar v. Dinesh Arora

14 Nov 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:5964

The Delhi High Court held that a Trial Court cannot defer consideration of an application under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC until the written statement is filed and directed expeditious disposal of such application.

civil petition_allowed Significant Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC specific performance limitation written statement

Rajni Gupta v. Vikas Gupta

14 Nov 2019 · Navin Chawla · 2019:DHC:5963

The Delhi High Court held that refusal to admit additional documents and witnesses in matrimonial proceedings is an interlocutory order not appealable under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act and dismissed the petition challenging the Family Court's order.

family petition_dismissed Significant Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 19 appealability interlocutory order additional documents