Delhi High Court

59,406 judgments

Year:

Union of India v. Hav Has Bahadur Gurung

03 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine SC 895
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that such disability is service-related absent contrary proof and limiting its review to legal errors only.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

M/S Gaurav Trading Co. v. Naveen Jain Sole Proprietor of M/S Metalcraft

03 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:7731-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a commercial appeal as infructuous following the respondent's withdrawal of the underlying suit.

civil appeal_dismissed appeal withdrawal of suit infructuous appeal commercial suit

Constable Krishna Swamy Shogokar v. Union of India

03 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:7726-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the respondents to treat it as a representation and decide it within six weeks, leaving the petitioner free to pursue legal remedies thereafter.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition representation time-bound consideration administrative grievance

Smt. Sharmila Devi v. The Registrar General, Delhi High Court

03 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:7733-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on the petitioner's request after partial hearing.

other petition_dismissed Procedural writ petition withdrawal dismissal Delhi High Court

XXXXX v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

03 Sep 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:7720

The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's order directing forensic examination of the accused's mobile phone, holding that the Coordinate Bench did not mandate such seizure and remanded the matter for fresh consideration on defence evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant electronic evidence mobile phone forensic examination Section 65A Indian Evidence Act Section 65B Indian Evidence Act

Jeetendra Kumar Singh v. Director of Education & Anr

03 Sep 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:7765

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a retrospective "deemed suspension" under Rule 115(4) of DSEAR pending fresh disciplinary inquiry after termination was set aside on technical grounds.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant deemed suspension Delhi School Education Act and Rules 1973 Rule 115(4) termination set aside

Akshay Thakur v. State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Sep 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:7764

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a consensual relationship case under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, emphasizing that consent between adults negates rape charges and unexplained FIR delay undermines prosecution credibility.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail consent rape Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023

State of NCT of Delhi v. Mahesh Kumar

03 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:7757

The Delhi High Court upheld the sentence under Section 304(II) IPC for death caused without intention to kill, emphasizing proportionality in sentencing and enhancing the fine payable to victims.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 304(II) IPC sentencing principles proportionality in sentencing mitigating factors

Chander Shekhar Sethi and Anr v. Vinod Sethi

03 Sep 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:7741
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court granted defendants one final opportunity to lead evidence despite prior closure by the Trial Court, imposing costs for delay to balance fairness and trial efficiency.

civil petition_allowed right to lead evidence adjournment dilatory tactics trial court discretion

Navendu Aggarwal v. Ishendu Aggarwal

03 Sep 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:7740

The Delhi High Court upheld injunction protecting disputed possession of a shop pending trial, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to concurrent lower court orders.

civil petition_dismissed injunction possession Will Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC

Tonny v. State

03 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:7752

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexual offences against a minor, holding that credible child witness testimony alone can sustain conviction under the POCSO Act without corroboration.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant child witness testimony POCSO Act Section 29 POCSO presumption sexual assault of minor

Sh. Mahender Pal Chhabra & Anr. v. Sh. Subhash Aggarwal

03 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:7655-DB

The High Court allowed the appeal, holding that the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to pay the balance sale consideration, thereby setting aside the decree for specific performance and permitting forfeiture of earnest money.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act earnest money forfeiture

Jyotsna Bedi v. Tikka Brijinder Singh Bedi

03 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:7707

The Delhi High Court held that execution courts must enforce consent decrees strictly as per their terms and cannot consider extraneous pre-decretal agreements not incorporated in the decree to delay execution.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant execution proceedings Section 47 CPC consent decree pre-decretal agreement

Narender Kumar Babbar @ Daddy v. State of NCT of Delhi

03 Sep 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:7706

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a murder accused who was a proclaimed offender for 16 years, emphasizing the seriousness of the offence, credible eyewitness and forensic evidence, and the need to expedite the delayed trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail murder proclaimed offender eyewitness testimony

Sangeet Seth v. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors.

03 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:7647-DB

The Delhi High Court held that 5% compounding charges under the Income Tax Act apply only after a prior offence has been compounded and set aside the demand for 5% charges where the earlier application was rejected.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 279(2) Compounding of offence Tax Deducted at Source (TDS)

Shiva @ Uwan v. State NCT of Delhi

03 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7700

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of parole due to a valid major punishment but allowed the petitioner to seek fresh parole consideration after the punishment period expired.

criminal appeal_dismissed parole major punishment jail misconduct acquittal

Sachin Pal v. The State NCT of Delhi

03 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7688

The Delhi High Court dismissed the accused's bail application in a firearm injury case, citing strong prosecution evidence and lack of diligence by the accused's counsel.

criminal petition_dismissed bail firearm injury Section 109(1) BNS Section 351(3) BNS

Rama Oberoi v. State NCT of Delhi

03 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7683

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash the summons under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that the complaint was timely filed and criminal proceedings can coexist with civil suits.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonour Premature complaint Civil and criminal remedies

Piyush Rohit Wason & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

03 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7698

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and full and final payment to the complainant.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

Chetan v. State GNCT of Delhi

03 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7684

The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of a convict's furlough request due to minor delay in surrender, emphasizing the rehabilitative purpose of furlough and directing fresh consideration with leniency.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant furlough parole convict reformation delay in surrender