Delhi High Court
101,979 judgments
PRODUCTS INDIA LTD v. SUMITOMO CHEMICAL COMPANY LTD
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and could not be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(a) CPC at the threshold stage in a trademark and copyright infringement suit.
Sajna Devi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that absence of a recovered ticket does not negate bona fide passenger status and remanded the claim for compensation for a railway accident, emphasizing the beneficial nature of the Railways Act provisions.
Abrar v. N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including last seen testimony and recoveries, ruling that non-recovery of the dead body is not fatal to the prosecution case.
Jitan Bora v. The State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, rejecting his plea of grave and sudden provocation and holding that the prosecution proved the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
Sanjay Chauhan & Ors. v. The State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of compromise and withdrawal of prosecution by the complainant in a matrimonial dispute.
Arun Chaudhary & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement and reconciliation between the parties.
Daulat Kumar @ Daulat Ram & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following a voluntary compromise and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Shivanshu Aggarwal v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 341, 323, and 506 IPC based on a compromise between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of grievance, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023.
Ravikant alias Bittu and Anr v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 186, 353, 332, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and the complainants' consent, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023.
Amit & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on a matrimonial settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Karamjeet & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023.
Fahed Khan & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute on the basis of amicable settlement and reconciliation between the parties.
Kalanithi Maran v. M/S Spicejet Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Petitioners' plea to substitute cash deposit with property security in enforcement of an arbitral award, holding repeated delay tactics as abuse of process and extending limited time to comply.
Union of India v. Gurmeet Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Registrar General of India's authority under the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 (as amended in 2023) to investigate and resolve conflicting death certificates to maintain the integrity of the national database.
Kamruddin @ Kamru v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court directed the State to verify medical documents and decide on the petitioner’s furlough request within five days, without granting immediate relief.
Abhinay Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case due to insufficient prima facie evidence and the accused's cooperation with the investigation.
Star Health and Allied Insurance Co Ltd v. Reena
The Delhi High Court condoned a one-day delay in deposit of decretal amount and restored stay on a consumer forum order, disposing of the petition filed under Article 227.
Star Health and Allied Insurance Company Limited v. Priya Devi
The Delhi High Court condoned a four-day delay in depositing the decretal amount and restored the stay on a consumer forum order, disposing of the petition filed under Article 227.
Star Health and Allied Insurance Co Ltd v. Menka
The Delhi High Court condoned a four-day delay in deposit of decretal amount and restored the stay on a consumer forum order pending appeal, disposing of the petition under Article 227.
STAR HEALTH AND ALLIED INSURANCE CO. LTD v. PRIYA DEVI
The Delhi High Court condoned a four-day delay in deposit of decretal amount and reinstated the stay on a consumer forum order, quashing coercive warrants issued against the petitioner's banker and bank official.