Delhi High Court

28,224 judgments

Year:

Neelam Joshi v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

06 Jan 2026 · Navin Chawla; Ravinder Dudeja · 2026:DHC:59-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ of habeas corpus petition directing transfer of custody of minor daughters to their mother, the natural guardian, emphasizing the paramount welfare of the child and the illegality of custody with grandparents.

family petition_allowed Significant writ of habeas corpus child custody natural guardian Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956

MICROSOFT CORPORATION INDIA PVT. LTD. v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS.

06 Jan 2026 · Dinesh Mehta; Vinod Kumar · 2026:DHC:85-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax Department to refund Rs. 5.37 crore with interest to Microsoft India for undue delay, imposing personal costs on the officer for non-compliance.

tax petition_allowed Income Tax refund Fringe Benefit Tax Section 244 Income Tax Act Section 244A(1A) Income Tax Act

Prabh Dawer v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr

06 Jan 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:98

The Delhi High Court quashed a theft-related FIR and proceedings following an amicable settlement, recovery of stolen goods, and the petitioner’s remorse, subject to payment of costs.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Article 226 Constitution Section 526 BNSS

Rajni Verma v. Umesh Kalia

06 Jan 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:97

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition permitting a convicted appellant suffering serious medical issues to appear via video conferencing and deferred coercive proceedings under Section 82 CrPC pending submission of complete medical evidence.

criminal petition_allowed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 82 CrPC video conferencing medical incapacity

Neha Pathania and Anr v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr

06 Jan 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:96

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR registered for criminal intimidation and casteist remarks following an amicable settlement between the parties and withdrawal of the complaint by the complainant.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Rohit & Anr. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

06 Jan 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:95

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a settlement between parties and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing prosecution would serve no useful purpose.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498-A IPC dowry demand compromise in criminal case

Ravi Kumar & Anr. v. State of Delhi & Anr.

06 Jan 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:94

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Monu Ojha alias Akhilesh Kumar and Another v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

06 Jan 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:93

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 452/323/34 IPC based on a voluntary compromise between parties involving simple injuries, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR compromise simple injuries Section 482 CrPC

Hamid Khan v. State NCT of Delhi

06 Jan 2026 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2026:DHC:78

The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from aggravated penetrative sexual assault to aggravated sexual assault under POCSO, reducing the sentence due to inconsistencies and lack of forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act aggravated sexual assault child sexual abuse delayed FIR

Vedanta Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

06 Jan 2026 · Amit Sharma · 2026:DHC:56

The Delhi High Court quashed the Government's arbitrary rejection of Vedanta's PSC extension application, emphasizing legitimate expectation and natural justice, and directed reconsideration with a hearing.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Production Sharing Contract Extension Policy 2017 Legitimate Expectation Natural Justice

Anuradha @ Chiku v. State (NCT of Delhi)

06 Jan 2026 · Sanjeev Narula · 2026:DHC:76
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's bail plea under MCOCA, holding that the stringent statutory conditions for bail were not met and that invocation of MCOCA against her was lawful based on prima facie material linking her to an organised drug trafficking syndicate.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant MCOCA bail under MCOCA organised crime syndicate continuing unlawful activity

Sudha Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

06 Jan 2026 · Amit Mahajan · 2026:DHC:54

The Delhi High Court held that a private individual who is not the complainant or the State cannot maintain a criminal appeal against acquittal arising from a police report unless they qualify as a "victim" under CrPC, which requires proof of loss or injury caused by the accused for which charges were framed.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant victim definition Section 378 CrPC appeal against acquittal forgery

Renuka Jain v. State (NCT of Delhi)

06 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:61

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition filed by the complainant de facto seeking directions for expeditious trial in a State prosecution under Section 420 IPC, holding that she lacked locus standi to do so.

criminal petition_dismissed locus standi complainant de facto Section 420 IPC expeditious trial

Ghanshyam @Tippu Pandit v. State of NCT of Delhi

06 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:57

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused involved in a loot case, considering his limited role, partial recovery, and bail granted to co-accused.

criminal appeal_allowed bail regular bail recovery loot

Ajay Sharma; Purnima Sharma; Kunal Sharma v. State of Govt. of NCT of Delhi

06 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:53

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused in a property mortgage dispute, emphasizing their legal interest in the property, regular loan repayment, and incomplete investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail mortgage immovable property legal heirs

SJVN Ltd. v. Patel Gammon Joint Venture

06 Jan 2026 · Jasmeet Singh · 2026:DHC:72
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award on haulage payment, holding the award valid and that courts in Himachal Pradesh have exclusive jurisdiction as per the contract.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge seat of arbitration venue of arbitration

China Trust Commercial Bank v. State of NCT of Delhi & Arun Jain

06 Jan 2026 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2026:DHC:51

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal complaint under Section 409 IPC against a bank and its officials, holding that presentation of a security cheque under a loan agreement does not constitute criminal breach of trust absent dishonest misappropriation.

criminal petition_allowed Significant criminal breach of trust Section 409 IPC security cheque loan agreement

JLT ENERGY 9 SAS v. HINDUSTAN CLEAN ENERGY LIMITED & Ors.

06 Jan 2026 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2026:DHC:71
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the automatic termination clause in the SPA operated due to non-fulfillment of the NA Conversion Condition, rejecting the petitioner's claim for interim relief and specific performance.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Condition Precedent Condition Subsequent Automatic Termination Specific Performance

Sanya Bhasin v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

06 Jan 2026 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2026:DHC:52

The Delhi High Court held that lawful medical termination of pregnancy within statutory limits, including on grounds of mental trauma from marital discord, does not constitute an offence under Section 312 IPC, affirming a woman's reproductive autonomy under Article 21.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 Section 312 IPC Reproductive autonomy Article 21 Constitution

Ram Kuber v. State (NCT of Delhi)

06 Jan 2026 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2026:DHC:50

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and 12-year sentence of Ram Kuber for repeated rape of a minor, affirming the reliability of the child victim's testimony despite minor discrepancies and DNA mismatch.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sexual assault POCSO Act child witness rape