Delhi High Court
100,734 judgments
Ramesh Kakkar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court extended the petitioner's interim bail till 31.08.2020 in accordance with the Full Bench clarification on automatic extension of bail during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Anil Kumar Thakur v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a government servant convicted of theft, holding that concurrent appointing authorities can validly impose dismissal without violating Article 311(1) of the Constitution.
Sanjay Kaul v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-8, New Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against ITAT's order disallowing short-term capital loss claimed on penny stock transactions held to be bogus accommodation entries, affirming the revenue's additions under the Income Tax Act.
BEOWORLD PVT. LTD v. BANG & OLUFSEN EXPANSION
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff was not entitled to specific performance or interim relief as the dealership agreement was determinable and the plaintiff failed to furnish the court-ordered bank guarantee, thereby vacating the interim injunction in favor of the defendant.
Ajay Pal Sharma v. Udaiveer Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed a defamation suit based on a tweet for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the plaintiff must plead specific access and damage within the court's jurisdiction under Section 19 CPC.
Dinesh Kumar v. Special Commissioner of Police (Training) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging disciplinary proceedings against a Delhi Police officer, holding that the Central Administrative Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction over such service matters.
Radha Devi v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of a PIL concerning illegal hawker markets by directing authorities to expeditiously consider the petitioner’s representation in accordance with law.
Rajesh Lal v. State
The Delhi High Court declined anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of dowry death and cruelty, emphasizing the statutory presumption and gravity of allegations under Sections 304B and 498A IPC.
Shailendra Kumar Singh v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging government subsidies, holding that courts must not interfere with bona fide policy decisions absent illegality or mala fides.
Neeraj alias Nagar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted parole to a convict with good jail conduct for one month to file a Special Leave Petition challenging his conviction and sentence enhancement.
BEOWORLD PVT. LTD v. BANG & OLUFSEN EXPANSION
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff had no indefeasible right to renew the Master Dealer Agreement, the contract was determinable, and vacated the interim injunction due to the plaintiff's failure to furnish the required bank guarantee.
Raunak & Anr. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom based on an amicable settlement between the parties and their consent to discontinue prosecution.
HIGH COMMAND v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to reconsider the petitioner’s representation challenging unrealistic bid profit margins and to pass a reasoned order before proceeding with the tender draw of lots.
Court on its own motion v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of Covid-19 related PILs after finding that the GNCTD had taken adequate steps to ensure hospital facilities, testing, and data transparency, directing continued compliance and leaving individual grievances to be addressed through proper legal channels.
Sharvan Kumar Rai v. Union of India & Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the CRPF Review Medical Board's decision declaring the petitioner medically unfit due to lung condition, emphasizing finality of armed forces medical fitness decisions and rejecting reliance on private medical opinions.
Sh. K.L. Monga v. The Chief Engineer (NDZ-8)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the arbitration petition as withdrawn without deciding on merits, allowing the petitioner to re-approach the Court later.
Dr. Neera Vyas v. Ministry of Ayush & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Central Administrative Tribunal to expedite the hearing and adjudication of the petitioner’s pending Original Application within three months, emphasizing procedural flexibility during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Shalini Singh v. United India Insurance Company Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal directing the employer to provide APAR forms, consider the appraisal excluding authorities alleged to be mala fide, and conduct the promotion interview lawfully and fairly.
Manish Sharma & Anr. v. Smt Urmila Arora
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretionary orders condoning delay in filing an application to set aside an ex-parte decree and refusing to dismiss it for non-payment of costs, emphasizing substantial justice over procedural technicalities.
Rakesh Sharma & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not available against private companies and dismissed the petition challenging termination of employment by Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited.