Delhi High Court
99,566 judgments
Neeraj alias Nagar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted parole to a convict with good jail conduct for one month to file a Special Leave Petition challenging his conviction and sentence enhancement.
BEOWORLD PVT. LTD v. BANG & OLUFSEN EXPANSION
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff had no indefeasible right to renew the Master Dealer Agreement, the contract was determinable, and vacated the interim injunction due to the plaintiff's failure to furnish the required bank guarantee.
Raunak & Anr. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom based on an amicable settlement between the parties and their consent to discontinue prosecution.
HIGH COMMAND v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to reconsider the petitioner’s representation challenging unrealistic bid profit margins and to pass a reasoned order before proceeding with the tender draw of lots.
Court on its own motion v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of Covid-19 related PILs after finding that the GNCTD had taken adequate steps to ensure hospital facilities, testing, and data transparency, directing continued compliance and leaving individual grievances to be addressed through proper legal channels.
Sharvan Kumar Rai v. Union of India & Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the CRPF Review Medical Board's decision declaring the petitioner medically unfit due to lung condition, emphasizing finality of armed forces medical fitness decisions and rejecting reliance on private medical opinions.
Sh. K.L. Monga v. The Chief Engineer (NDZ-8)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the arbitration petition as withdrawn without deciding on merits, allowing the petitioner to re-approach the Court later.
Dr. Neera Vyas v. Ministry of Ayush & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Central Administrative Tribunal to expedite the hearing and adjudication of the petitioner’s pending Original Application within three months, emphasizing procedural flexibility during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Shalini Singh v. United India Insurance Company Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal directing the employer to provide APAR forms, consider the appraisal excluding authorities alleged to be mala fide, and conduct the promotion interview lawfully and fairly.
Manish Sharma & Anr. v. Smt Urmila Arora
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretionary orders condoning delay in filing an application to set aside an ex-parte decree and refusing to dismiss it for non-payment of costs, emphasizing substantial justice over procedural technicalities.
Rakesh Sharma & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not available against private companies and dismissed the petition challenging termination of employment by Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited.
Naresh Kumar v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.
The High Court held that a party cannot be denied the right to lead evidence solely because it has cross-examined the opposing party's witness and allowed the petitioner to lead evidence to rebut the respondent's demarcation report.
Akhil Bhartiya Lodhi Adhivakta Sangh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Advocates-on-Record system and dismissed the petition seeking to allow all advocates to file and plead before the Supreme Court, affirming the Supreme Court's exclusive power to regulate its practice.
Three C Universal Developers Private Limited & Ors. v. Horizon Crest India Real Estate & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award as barred by limitation, holding that a filing lacking fundamental documents is non-est and cannot stop the limitation period under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Mahabir Prasad Yadav v. Lakshmibai College
The Delhi High Court held that a suspended employee is entitled to enhanced subsistence allowance after three months if suspension prolongs for reasons not attributable to him, pay revision benefits under the 7th Pay Commission if effective prior to suspension, but is not entitled to annual increments during suspension.
Ministry of Law and Justice v. Bhavnesh Saini & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging interim directions for disclosure of marks by a Selection Committee, directing the CAT to expeditiously hear and decide the original application, noting no legal requirement to award such marks.
Virag Tiwari v. The Central Board of Direct Taxes & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to allow the petitioner credit for tax deducted at source of Rs. 2,40,000 in the relevant assessment year by making necessary rectifications, disposing of the writ petition as satisfied.
Devangana Kalita v. Delhi Police
The Delhi High Court held that authorized police communication naming an accused in a charge sheet does not violate fair trial rights, but restrained further disclosures pending trial to protect the presumption of innocence and dignity.
Pavan Sachdeva v. Office of the Insurance Ombudsman and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that non-disclosure of a remote, cured ailment does not amount to material non-disclosure justifying repudiation of a health insurance claim and allowed the writ petition challenging the Insurance Ombudsman's order.
Bhawna Bhati v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed police to conduct domiciliary visits to the petitioner's residence within reasonable hours and with a lady constable present, safeguarding her fundamental rights under Article 21 during investigation-related visits.