Delhi High Court
99,566 judgments
HYOSUNG CORPORATION v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax authority to decide the petitioner’s pending rectification application within six weeks and release any refund due with interest, emphasizing compliance with statutory timelines under the Income Tax Act.
Pirthi Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court extended the petitioner's interim bail till 31.08.2020 in accordance with a Full Bench clarification on automatic extension of interim bail during the COVID-19 period.
Farhal v. State, NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court extended the petitioner's interim bail till 31.08.2020 in accordance with the Full Bench order providing automatic extension of interim bail granted before or after 16.03.2020.
Sajid Ali Abdul Qadir v. Union Public Service Commission
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing UPSC to restore the petitioner's candidature under the EWS category by permitting rectification of defective Income and Asset Certificates submitted before the cut-off date.
HYOSUNG CORPORATION v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax authority to dispose of the petitioner’s rectification application within six weeks and allow adjustment of the acknowledged tax demand against refunds in accordance with law.
Dinesh Bahadur Singh v. Bank of Maharashtra
The Delhi High Court quashed the wilful defaulter declaration against petitioners for non-compliance with procedural safeguards mandated by the RBI Master Circular and Supreme Court, directing fresh proceedings with due opportunity of representation.
Nishant Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Appeal Medical Board's decision on medical unfitness for Indian Air Force Airmen recruitment is final, dismissing the petitioner's plea for a fresh medical examination.
Kulwant Rai Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the transfer of a BSF officer, holding that adhoc attachments do not confer a right to complete a three-year tenure under BSF rules and absent mala fide, transfer orders will not be interfered with.
Vijesh Kumar M and Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed CISF to grant pay fixation and arrears to Head Constables (Driver/DCPO) petitioners in accordance with a prior judgment, or provide reasons for denial.
Pankaj Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the administrative transfer of a railway officer within Delhi and directed consideration of his request for lighter duties by a reasoned order.
Abhijit Mishra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking inclusion of advocates as professionals under the MSME Act, holding that advocates can approach courts individually and PIL is not maintainable for their benefit.
Ramesh Kakkar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court extended the petitioner's interim bail till 31.08.2020 in accordance with the Full Bench clarification on automatic extension of bail during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Anil Kumar Thakur v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a government servant convicted of theft, holding that concurrent appointing authorities can validly impose dismissal without violating Article 311(1) of the Constitution.
Sanjay Kaul v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-8, New Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against ITAT's order disallowing short-term capital loss claimed on penny stock transactions held to be bogus accommodation entries, affirming the revenue's additions under the Income Tax Act.
BEOWORLD PVT. LTD v. BANG & OLUFSEN EXPANSION
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff was not entitled to specific performance or interim relief as the dealership agreement was determinable and the plaintiff failed to furnish the court-ordered bank guarantee, thereby vacating the interim injunction in favor of the defendant.
Ajay Pal Sharma v. Udaiveer Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed a defamation suit based on a tweet for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the plaintiff must plead specific access and damage within the court's jurisdiction under Section 19 CPC.
Dinesh Kumar v. Special Commissioner of Police (Training) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging disciplinary proceedings against a Delhi Police officer, holding that the Central Administrative Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction over such service matters.
Radha Devi v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of a PIL concerning illegal hawker markets by directing authorities to expeditiously consider the petitioner’s representation in accordance with law.
Rajesh Lal v. State
The Delhi High Court declined anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of dowry death and cruelty, emphasizing the statutory presumption and gravity of allegations under Sections 304B and 498A IPC.
Shailendra Kumar Singh v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging government subsidies, holding that courts must not interfere with bona fide policy decisions absent illegality or mala fides.