Full Text
Through Ms.Petal Chandhok,Adv.
JUDGMENT
(24) W.P.(C 10104/2020& CM Nos.32155-56/2020 (25) W.P.(C 10106/2020 & CM Nos.32157-58/2020 (26) W.P.(C 10107/2020 & CM Nos.32159-60/2020 (28) W.P.(C 10110/2020 & CM Nos.32168-69/2020 (29) W.P.(C 10111/2020 & CM Nos.32170-71/2020 (30) W.P.(C 10112/2020 & CM Nos.32172-73/2020 (31) W.P.(C 10113/2020 & CM Nos.32174-75/2020 (32) W.P.(C 10114/2020 & CM Nos.32176-77/2020 (33) W.P.(C 10115/2020 & CM Nos.32178-79/2020 (34) W.P.(C 10116/2020 & CM Nos.32180-81/2020 (35) W.P.(C 10117/2020 i& CM Nos.32182-83/2020 (36) W.P.(C 10118/2020 & CM Nos.32184-85/2020 (40) W.P.(C 10137/2020 & CM Nos.32288-89/2020
VERSUS
NEW LIKITHA CABLE AND ANR. Respondents S.N.ARUN KUMAR CABLE TV NETWORK & ANR.Respondents HARIS VIDEO CENTRE& ANR. Respondents UDAYAGIRICABLE NETWORKS& ANR Respondents SRIKANNIKA DISH AND CABLE VISION& ANR...Respondents SRI GANESHA ENTERPRISES& ANR. Respondents SRISEETHA DEVICABLENETWORK& ANR Respondents VINAYAKA CABLE& ANR. Respondents SRI MANJUNATHA DISH VIEW & ANR. Respondents RAGHAVENDRAENTERPRISES& ANR. Respondents SUBASH CABLENETWORK& ANR. Respondents SRIMANIUNATHA CABLENETWORKS&ANR Respondents SRIRAGHAVENDRA CABLENETWORK&ANR....Respondents AKSHAYA CABLENETWORK&ANR. Respondents Through Ms.VidyaPrabhakaranKhurana& Mr.Mukul Sharma,Advs. 2020:DHC:3891 A CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA ORDER % 10.12.2020 1• Thishearing has been held by video conferencing.
2. The primaiy grievance of the petitioner(s) in the present batch of petitions IS thatthe petitions having been filed oii05.10.2020,the same have not been listed before the learned Telecom Disputes'Settlement and AppellateTribunal(TDSAT)in spiteofbeing mentionedforurgentlisting.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that these petitions seek urgentinterim reliefinasmuch as it is the case ofthe petitioner thatthe respondent no.l in each ofthese petitions,in spite ofhaving Interconnection Agreement(s) with the petitioner, is migrating its subscribers to the respondentno.2 withoutfollowing the Interconnection Regulations.
4. Keeping in view the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits ofthe underlying dispute between the petitioner and the respondents, the learned TDSAT is requested to list these petitions for hearing within a week of the communication of this order. The petitions shall be considered by the learned TDSAT on their own merit.
5. The petitions are disposed ofwith the above directions. There shall be no order as to cost.