Delhi High Court
97,209 judgments
Pramod Narayan Sharma & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the CRPF to decide the petitioners' pending representation regarding MACP benefits within six weeks without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Girish Mittal v. Prateek Madhan and Ors.
The Delhi High Court recalled an ex-parte order in a summary suit due to improper service of summons and held that defendants showing sufficient cause for non-appearance must be allowed to defend.
Wholesale Trading Services (India) Private Ltd v. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the ICAI's dismissal of a complaint against a court-appointed auditor, holding that only the Karnataka High Court could examine the auditor's reports and that the petitioner lacked locus standi to maintain parallel proceedings.
Gupta and Co. v. DDA
The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitral award to the extent it failed to award pre-reference interest and did not provide reasons for rejecting such claim, emphasizing the mandatory requirement of reasoned awards under Section 31(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Upendra Rai v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that Special Courts constituted under the PMLA have jurisdiction to try scheduled offences under the PC Act, and transfer of such cases to the Special Court (PMLA) is valid despite the PC Act's exclusive jurisdiction clause.
Mohd. Bilal v. State of NCT of Delhi
Bail was denied to the petitioner accused of murder during Delhi riots due to prima facie evidence, ongoing investigation, and serious nature of offences.
B.K. Bhatnagar & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners' claim for pay parity arrears limited to three years prior to the original application, directing payment from 2012 instead of 2006.
Chhaya Rai & Anr. v. KLJ Developers Private Limited; Anjani Kumar Rai v. KLJ Developers Private Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside the appointment of an arbitrator appointed under a one-sided arbitration clause for non-compliance with Section 12(5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, and appointed a new arbitrator to continue the proceedings.
Chhaya Rai & Anr. v. KLJ Developers Private Limited; Anjani Kumar Rai v. KLJ Developers Private Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside the appointment of a sole arbitrator made under a one-sided arbitration clause as invalid under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act and appointed a new arbitrator to continue the proceedings.
Shantanu Prakash v. Union Bank of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Bank must comply with natural justice and the RBI Master Circular's procedural safeguards before declaring promoters as wilful defaulters, setting aside prior orders and remanding for fresh consideration.
Gaurav Vij & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT) Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 467, and 471 IPC on the ground of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Shantanu Prakash v. Union Bank of India
The Delhi High Court set aside the Bank's wilful defaulter classification orders for failure to comply with natural justice and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with proper disclosure and reasoned decisions.
Bimal Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to petitioners similarly placed to earlier cases, with arrears and interest, preserving rights to further remedies.
Ambika College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside NCTE's rejection of an integrated B.Ed. programme application based on a State Government ban, directing reconsideration in line with prior precedent protecting applications filed before such bans.
MST. X v. STATE & ORS.
Delhi High Court held that interim compensation of Rs. 50,000 to a minor sexual abuse victim was inadequate and directed reassessment in line with statutory guidelines and victim compensation schemes.
Apoorva Y K v. South Asian University
The Delhi High Court held that South Asian University, despite its intergovernmental status, is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 for disciplinary actions violating natural justice and set aside the expulsion of the petitioner.
Anju Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of External Affairs to facilitate repatriation of an Indian citizen's mortal remains from Saudi Arabia after an erroneous death certificate translation, ensuring last rites as per religion and payment of pending dues.
Danny Pal alias Dainy & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
Autometers Alliance Limited v. Rail Vikas Nigam Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with the termination of a government contract, emphasizing adherence to contractual dispute resolution and jurisdiction clauses, and directed parties to attempt amicable settlement.
Roshni Sana Jaiswal v. Commissioner of Central Taxes, GST Delhi (East)
The Delhi High Court quashed provisional attachment of a non-taxable person's bank accounts under Section 83 of the CGST Act, holding such attachment without jurisdiction as the petitioner was not a taxable person under the Act.