Delhi High Court

36,380 judgments

Year:

Pooja v. Union of India & Ors.

27 May 2021 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Amit Bansal · 2021:DHC:1727-DB

Vivek Sheel Aggarwal & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

25 May 2021 · D. N. Patel; Jyoti Singh · 2021:DHC:1701-DB

Girja Bhan v. The Estate Officer and Anr.

21 May 2021 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2021:DHC:1670

Ajay Saxena v. Union of India

19 May 2021 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2021:DHC:1647-DB

Apoorva Y K v. South Asian University

13 May 2021 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:360

The Delhi High Court held that South Asian University, despite its intergovernmental status, is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 for disciplinary actions violating natural justice and set aside the expulsion of the petitioner.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 writ jurisdiction public function natural justice

Quantum University v. International Quantum University for Integrative Medicine Inc

04 May 2021 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:9061

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award cancelling the domain name quantumuniversity.edu.in held by the petitioner, finding it confusingly similar and registered in bad faith against the respondent's prior trademark and domain name rights under the INDRP.

other appeal_dismissed Significant INDRP domain name dispute bad faith registration quantumuniversity.edu.in

Fahed Ahmed Khan v. National Board of Examination

09 Apr 2021 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:1495
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that the NBE must exercise discretion and consider merits before refusing rejoining of DNB training for unauthorized absence, allowing the petitioner to resume training after prolonged absence due to genuine medical emergency.

administrative petition_allowed Significant DNB training unauthorized absence leave rules discretionary power

SARDA SOLVENT EXTRACTION PVT. LTD. v. M/S BANGA KNITTING AND DYEING MILLS

08 Apr 2021 · C. Hari Shankar
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Execution petitions filed beyond the 12-year limitation period under the Limitation Act cannot be entertained, and delay caused by a company being struck off from the ROC cannot be excluded unless expressly provided by statute.

civil appeal_dismissed execution petition limitation period Article 136 Limitation Act condonation of delay

Vipin Singh v. State and Anr.

07 Apr 2021 · Amit Sharma · 2023:DHC:873

Delhi High Court granted bail to accused in POCSO case holding that age determination is for trial court and Section 29 presumption does not apply at bail stage before framing charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail POCSO Act age determination Section 29 POCSO

Surinder Kumar v. Ram Ditti

26 Mar 2021 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2554

The Delhi High Court held that recall of an order closing evidence requires proper reasons and sufficient cause, granting the respondent a final opportunity to lead evidence under strict conditions.

civil petition_dismissed Significant recall of order closure of evidence sufficient cause adjournment