MEP SANJOSE MAHUVA KAGAVADAR ROAD PVT. LTD. v. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

Delhi High Court · 25 May 2021 · 2021:DHC:1697-DB
Manmohan; Navin Chawla
FAO(OS)(COMM) 32/2021 & FAO(OS)(COMM) 33/2021
2021:DHC:1697-DB
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court held that findings on Section 9 applications are prima facie and not binding if arbitration is initiated, and directed fair consideration of conciliation requests.

Full Text
Translation output
FAO(OS)(COMM) 32/2021 & FAO(OS)(COMM) 33/2021
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 25th May, 2021
FAO(OS) (COMM) 32/2021 & CM No.7610/2021
MEP SANJOSE MAHUVA KAGAVADAR ROAD PVT.
LTD. ..... Appellant
Through Mr.Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Ms.Arti Dvivedi, Mr.Sushant
Kumar Sarkar, Mr.Rishabh Jain, Advs.
VERSUS
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Padma Priya, Ms.Shreya Sethi, Advs. (NHAI)
FAO(OS) (COMM) 33/2021 & CM No.7611/2021
MEP SANJOSE TALAJA MAHUVA ROAD PVT. LTD..... Appellant
Through Mr.Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Ms.Arti Dvivedi, Mr.Sushant
Kumar Sarkar, Mr.Rishabh Jain, Advs.
VERSUS
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Padma Priya, Ms.Shreya Sethi, Advs. (NHAI)
2021:DHC:1697-DB
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA MANMOHAN, J. (Oral)
JUDGMENT

1. The appeals have been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants states that vide letters dated 09th March, 2021 and 12th May, 2021, the appellants have initiated the conciliation process. He prays that the respondents be directed to deal with the conciliation applications with an open mind.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent-NHAI states that the appellants have deposited a draft of Rs.[5] lacs alongwith the conciliation letter dated 12th

5. With the aforesaid clarifications, the present appeals are May, 2021. She assures this Court that the conciliation request of the appellants shall be considered with open and independent mind.

4. At this stage, learned counsel for the appellants seeks a clarification that, in the event, the arbitration process is initiated by the appellants, then the finding of the learned Single Judge shall not be treated as conclusive and/or binding.

5. It is settled law that the findings of the learned Single Judge while deciding an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are a prima facie opinion arrived at for deciding the said application. The Arbitrators shall decide the matter in accordance with law and the evidence led before them by the parties. disposed of. However, the respondents are directed to consider the conciliation request made by the appellants in a fair manner in accordance with law, within a reasonable time.

6. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail. MANMOHAN, J NAVIN CHAWLA, J MAY 25, 2021