Delhi High Court
35,876 judgments
Neelam v. Chandra Rekha Malik & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a partition suit on the basis of a voluntary settlement between the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, confirming the division of property shares and sale to a third party.
Kapil Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that an FIR under Section 376 IPC cannot be quashed on the basis of a compromise or settlement between the parties, emphasizing the serious societal impact of rape offences.
M/S HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
The Delhi High Court directed the Government to promptly fill vacancies and consider increasing manpower in the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA to ensure efficient and timely adjudication of cases.
M/S HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
The Delhi High Court directed the Government to promptly fill vacancies and augment manpower in the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA to ensure efficient adjudication of money laundering cases and protect petitioners' rights.
HELL ENERGY MAGYARORSZAG KFT. v. SHRI BRAHM SHAKTI PRINCE BEVERAGES PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit in terms of a settlement agreement and ordered refund of entire court fees to the plaintiff.
M/S HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
The Delhi High Court directed the Government to fill long-standing vacancies and consider increasing staff strength at the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA to ensure efficient adjudication of enforcement cases.
M/S HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
The Delhi High Court directed the Government to urgently fill vacancies and enhance manpower in the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA to ensure efficient adjudication and protect parties' rights.
Pragati Construction Consultants v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes despite respondent's no claim certificate contention, affirming the principle that arbitration should proceed unless claims are manifestly time-barred or dead.
M/S HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
Delhi High Court directs the Government to promptly fill vacancies and strengthen staffing in the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA to ensure efficient adjudication and addresses petitions challenging freezing of bank accounts.
Mamta v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a female accused in an NDPS case, holding that the mandatory requirement of search by an empowered female officer under Section 50(4) NDPS Act was prima facie not complied with, but the question is for trial.
M/S HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
The Delhi High Court directed the Government to promptly fill vacancies and consider increasing manpower at the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA to ensure its effective functioning and ordered procedural compliance in pending writ petitions.
SH PARMOD KUMAR v. SH LALIT MOHAN
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of commercial tenants on bona fide personal requirement grounds where the landlord's dependent mother sought premises to open a yoga centre, emphasizing the landlord's primacy in determining suitability and rejecting tenants' objections as insufficient to raise triable issues.
Dharmender Sharma v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking blanket relief for street vendors under the PM SVANidhi Scheme due to vague pleadings and lack of particulars, directing individual representations to be decided by the NDMC.
Shiv Kumar v. The Registrar Cooperative Societies & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an ex parte Arbitration Award, directing the cooperative tribunal to expedite the pending appeal and refusing to stay recovery proceedings.
SH PARMOD KUMAR v. SH LALIT MOHAN
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of commercial tenants on bona fide personal need grounds for the landlord’s dependent mother to open a Yoga Centre, emphasizing the landlord’s primacy in determining need and the tenant’s failure to raise triable issues.
EX HC GD RAM SWAROOP v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider and grant the second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme to petitioners in accordance with binding Supreme Court and High Court judgments within twelve weeks.
M/S HAMILTON HOUSEWARES PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
The Delhi High Court directed the Government to promptly fill vacancies and consider increasing staff strength at the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA to ensure its efficient functioning and timely adjudication of cases.
M/S BKFC AND CO. v. M/S TRANSPARENT ENERGY SYSTEM PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 does not apply retrospectively to arbitration proceedings commenced before 23rd October 2015 absent express agreement, and dismissed the petition seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under amended Section 29A.
GENESTORE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR. v. SPICE HEALTHCARE PVT LTD & ORS.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under agreements containing arbitration clauses, deleted non-signatory directors as parties, and referred interim relief applications to arbitration.
GENESTORE INDIA PVT LTD v. SPICE HEALTHCARE PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from multiple agreements, deleted non-signatory directors from the proceedings, and referred pre-arbitral relief applications to the arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.