Delhi High Court
76,032 judgments
M/S Nikhil Infratech Ltd. & Ors. v. M/S Intec Capital Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed compounding of a cheque bounce offence under Section 138 N.I. Act after conviction, following settlement and compliance with Supreme Court guidelines, and acquitted the petitioners.
MS MANIKA BATRA v. TABLE TENNIS FEDERATION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court stayed mandatory National Camp attendance rules imposed by the Table Tennis Federation of India, directing an independent inquiry into allegations against the national coach, emphasizing merit-based selection and fairness under the National Sports Development Code, 2011.
HERO FINCORP. LIMITED v. HEMA AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes where parties failed to concur on arbitrator appointment.
Biru Ram & Anr. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to file a fresh regularization application with complete ownership documents and restrained the municipal corporation from coercive action until the application was decided on merits.
CLARKS FUTURE FOOTWEAR PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE & ORS.
The Delhi High Court quashed a draft assessment order passed prematurely under the Income Tax Act for violating mandatory procedural requirements and principles of natural justice, directing a fresh assessment after allowing the petitioner to file objections.
Sh. Surender Kumar v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing prompt disposal of the appellant's pending application under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and granted interim financial relief due to respondent's failure to file a reply.
HERO FINCORP. LIMITED v. HEMA AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes where parties failed to agree on arbitrator appointment.
Meenakshi Sharma v. Anju Sharma
The Delhi High Court accepted a joint settlement under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC regarding property sale disputes, disposed of the appeals accordingly, and directed the Trial Court to record the settlement and pass consequential orders including refund of court fees.
Ashwani Kumar Sharma v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking eviction of a lessee from land situated in Haryana, holding that the proper remedy is an eviction suit and that the court lacks territorial jurisdiction.
Sandeep Garg v. Renu Proptech Private Limited
The Delhi High Court directed the Resolution Professional in insolvency proceedings to appear and produce CIRP records in arbitration under Section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Meenakshi Sharma v. Anju Sharma
The Delhi High Court disposed of connected civil appeals by recording a lawful settlement under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC and directed the Trial Court to dispose of suits accordingly with consequential orders on court fees.
Barinder Jeet Singh v. Ajit Kaur
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the ground of bona fide requirement by the landlady, ruling that financial status or age does not negate bona fide need under rent control law.
Suresh Sivanandan v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension arrears with interest to a petitioner similarly placed as in earlier judgments, preserving procedural safeguards and appeal rights.
Techno Aircon Industries Pvt Ltd v. ABB Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside the executing court's direction to file affidavit under a single judge judgment that was overruled, directing fresh consideration in execution proceedings pending challenge to the arbitral award.
Shree Vijaya Fabrics Thr Vimlawanti Manchanda v. Shivani Khanna & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing service of relevant interrogatories under Order XI CPC, emphasizing a liberal approach and proper procedure for objections.
Satender Jain v. Satya Narain Sanjiv Gupta HUF
The Delhi High Court allowed the respondent's application to amend the judgment to correct the sequence of counsel appearances, emphasizing permissible procedural corrections.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Surender
The Delhi High Court held that a workman is entitled to wages under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act from the date of the award if he files an affidavit of unemployment without undue delay.
HMS Unani Medical College and Hospital and Others v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the Union's decision not to further reduce the NEET percentile for AYUSH admissions, holding that discretion under the relevant regulations must be exercised based on sufficiency of qualified candidates and not vacancy position.
DR. V.P. APPAN v. SECRETARY, (DLSA SOUTH-EAST), DISTRICT COURT, SAKET
The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation of Rs. 2,00,000 awarded under the Delhi Victim Compensation Scheme, 2015, dismissing the appeal challenging the adequacy of compensation based on a later disability certificate.
MCL KSIPL (JV) v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve payment disputes arising from a construction contract due to the respondent's failure to appoint one.