Delhi High Court
77,152 judgments
Anil Bansal & Ors. v. Rajender Kumar Returning Officer & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Returning Officer to decide the petitioners' representations regarding his appointment and election process expeditiously, without quashing the appointment or postponing the election.
HERO FINCORP. LIMITED v. HEMA AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes where parties failed to agree on arbitrator appointment.
Rajneesh Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension to petitioners similarly placed as in earlier cases, with interest on delayed arrears and provision for written reasons if denied.
Lakshmi Narayan Sahu v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to verify and grant pro rata pension arrears and future payments to the petitioner if similarly placed as in earlier judgments, preserving procedural safeguards and interest on delayed payments.
M/S Nikhil Infratech Ltd. & Ors. v. M/S Intec Capital Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed compounding of a cheque bounce offence under Section 138 N.I. Act after conviction, following settlement and compliance with Supreme Court guidelines, and acquitted the petitioners.
MS MANIKA BATRA v. TABLE TENNIS FEDERATION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court stayed mandatory National Camp attendance rules imposed by the Table Tennis Federation of India, directing an independent inquiry into allegations against the national coach, emphasizing merit-based selection and fairness under the National Sports Development Code, 2011.
HERO FINCORP. LIMITED v. HEMA AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes where parties failed to concur on arbitrator appointment.
Biru Ram & Anr. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to file a fresh regularization application with complete ownership documents and restrained the municipal corporation from coercive action until the application was decided on merits.
CLARKS FUTURE FOOTWEAR PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE & ORS.
The Delhi High Court quashed a draft assessment order passed prematurely under the Income Tax Act for violating mandatory procedural requirements and principles of natural justice, directing a fresh assessment after allowing the petitioner to file objections.
Sh. Surender Kumar v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing prompt disposal of the appellant's pending application under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and granted interim financial relief due to respondent's failure to file a reply.
HERO FINCORP. LIMITED v. HEMA AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes where parties failed to agree on arbitrator appointment.
Meenakshi Sharma v. Anju Sharma
The Delhi High Court accepted a joint settlement under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC regarding property sale disputes, disposed of the appeals accordingly, and directed the Trial Court to record the settlement and pass consequential orders including refund of court fees.
Ashwani Kumar Sharma v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking eviction of a lessee from land situated in Haryana, holding that the proper remedy is an eviction suit and that the court lacks territorial jurisdiction.
Sandeep Garg v. Renu Proptech Private Limited
The Delhi High Court directed the Resolution Professional in insolvency proceedings to appear and produce CIRP records in arbitration under Section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Meenakshi Sharma v. Anju Sharma
The Delhi High Court disposed of connected civil appeals by recording a lawful settlement under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC and directed the Trial Court to dispose of suits accordingly with consequential orders on court fees.
Barinder Jeet Singh v. Ajit Kaur
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the ground of bona fide requirement by the landlady, ruling that financial status or age does not negate bona fide need under rent control law.
Suresh Sivanandan v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed verification and grant of pro rata pension arrears with interest to a petitioner similarly placed as in earlier judgments, preserving procedural safeguards and appeal rights.
Techno Aircon Industries Pvt Ltd v. ABB Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside the executing court's direction to file affidavit under a single judge judgment that was overruled, directing fresh consideration in execution proceedings pending challenge to the arbitral award.
Shree Vijaya Fabrics Thr Vimlawanti Manchanda v. Shivani Khanna & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing service of relevant interrogatories under Order XI CPC, emphasizing a liberal approach and proper procedure for objections.
Satender Jain v. Satya Narain Sanjiv Gupta HUF
The Delhi High Court allowed the respondent's application to amend the judgment to correct the sequence of counsel appearances, emphasizing permissible procedural corrections.